Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Woman jailed over (very late on in pregnancy) abortion, released on appeal...

143 replies

FadeAwayAndRadiate · 18/07/2023 19:09

Carla Foster: Mother jailed over lockdown abortion to be released - BBC News

So should she have been released? Or made to serve her sentence?

YABU, no she should NOT have been released.

YANBU, yes she SHOULD have been released.

Interested to hear people views.

Royal Courts of Justice

Carla Foster: Mother jailed over lockdown abortion to be released

The Court of Appeal reduces Carla Foster's sentence for illegally taking abortion tablets.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-65581850

OP posts:
Q2C4 · 18/07/2023 22:32

FlipFlopPlop · 18/07/2023 20:01

This is quite a delicate debate. This wasn't an abortion at a stage where it wouldn't be described as a viable baby, this took place when the baby was viable.

This does remind me of the recent case in the US, the (I believe) 19 year old, gave birth in hospital toilets and discarded the poor baby.

The reactions (I'm just going off what I've observed on social media) , seem different, and I'm wondering why?

Or this one: www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/jun/26/teenager-murdered-newborn-son-herefordshire-jailed-paris-mayo

Q2C4 · 18/07/2023 22:34

AIBot · 18/07/2023 20:03

I support abortion to term - her body, her choice, but I’m not convinced this was much of an informed choice. The psychology of this is as others have alluded to, complex.

I aLeo think it’s unfair on her existing children being deprived of their mother.

You'd support abortion at any stage pre birth? 39 weeks? 40 weeks? When the baby is clearly sentient and viable? How is that different to having the baby then killing it?

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 22:51

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 22:31

What are you basing this on? The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists have come out in support of decriminalizing abortion, there will of course be doctors willing to carry them out.

Will there? The RCOG can make recommendations, they wouldn’t be the individuals carrying it out. Would you be able to inject the heart of a fully formed viable baby, watch its heart stop beating on a screen then deliver its lifeless body? See its face and hands, knowing you ended its life? If not, why not?

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 22:59

Q2C4 · 18/07/2023 22:34

You'd support abortion at any stage pre birth? 39 weeks? 40 weeks? When the baby is clearly sentient and viable? How is that different to having the baby then killing it?

In my experience people who make this argument are making it from the luxury position of behind a screen, knowing they’ll never have to personally be involved with such a messy business, that ‘other people’ will have it on their conscience instead.

If they were handed the lethal injection and instructed to end the life of a 35 week foetus, I guarantee they would suddenly appreciate the moral dilemma behind late terminations, and understand why it is unethical to expect doctors to carry them out as part of a professional ‘duty’.

Equally they can rarely say when exactly this right ends and the rights of the baby begin. When it’s head is born? When the feet are out? When the cord is cut? When the mother has stopped breastfeeding as technically the baby is still dependent on her body for life until then?

‘As early as possible as late as necessary’ is simply a catchy mantra for those who will never personally be involved in the late termination of a healthy baby. And they know that.

Nat6999 · 18/07/2023 23:00

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 19:12

So all forms of prostitution should be legal? And we should be able to pay homeless people to fight for entertainment?

If a woman chooses to be a prostitute without being forced by a pimp, then yes it should be legal. It's no different than a woman being a stripper or dancing & doing private dances in a club. Abortion should be legal whatever the state of pregnancy, better that than a child born into this world & mistreated, abused or not wanted. This poor woman should not have been dragged through the courts & jailed for making a decision about her own body.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:01

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 22:51

Will there? The RCOG can make recommendations, they wouldn’t be the individuals carrying it out. Would you be able to inject the heart of a fully formed viable baby, watch its heart stop beating on a screen then deliver its lifeless body? See its face and hands, knowing you ended its life? If not, why not?

I think it would be unlikely for them to support decriminalization knowing that they would not be able to meet the needs of women.

I’m not a doctor, so lack the necessary qualifications. Were I a doctor then yes, I would be willing to perform abortions.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:03

“If they were handed the lethal injection and instructed to end the life of a 35 week foetus, I guarantee they would suddenly appreciate the moral dilemma behind late terminations, and understand why it is unethical to expect doctors to carry them out as part of a professional ‘duty’. “

You know full well you cannot guarantee that. Hoping you could and knowing you could are two very different things.

For me there is no moral dilemma, a woman will always takes priority.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:03

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:03

“If they were handed the lethal injection and instructed to end the life of a 35 week foetus, I guarantee they would suddenly appreciate the moral dilemma behind late terminations, and understand why it is unethical to expect doctors to carry them out as part of a professional ‘duty’. “

You know full well you cannot guarantee that. Hoping you could and knowing you could are two very different things.

For me there is no moral dilemma, a woman will always takes priority.

You would happily do that would you?

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:05

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:03

You would happily do that would you?

Yes, I would.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:05

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:05

Yes, I would.

Sure

Q2C4 · 18/07/2023 23:09

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:03

“If they were handed the lethal injection and instructed to end the life of a 35 week foetus, I guarantee they would suddenly appreciate the moral dilemma behind late terminations, and understand why it is unethical to expect doctors to carry them out as part of a professional ‘duty’. “

You know full well you cannot guarantee that. Hoping you could and knowing you could are two very different things.

For me there is no moral dilemma, a woman will always takes priority.

On that basis, a woman who's given birth but decided she doesn't want to look after the baby would be within her rights to kill it...

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:09

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:05

Sure

I don’t require you to believe me 🤷🏻‍♀️

That you don’t accept that doctors will be willing to perform late term abortions, although they already do indeed exist, doesn’t mean that they won’t be.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:11

Q2C4 · 18/07/2023 23:09

On that basis, a woman who's given birth but decided she doesn't want to look after the baby would be within her rights to kill it...

At that point there are two separate individuals. Location isn’t a minor detail.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:13

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:09

I don’t require you to believe me 🤷🏻‍♀️

That you don’t accept that doctors will be willing to perform late term abortions, although they already do indeed exist, doesn’t mean that they won’t be.

There will never be enough willing doctors to make it a valid service, accessible to all. There might be a small handful but that won’t be enough. Most people don’t go into the medical profession to end the life of viable 35 week healthy babies. Most people see this as barbaric regardless of the woman’s circumstances.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:14

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:11

At that point there are two separate individuals. Location isn’t a minor detail.

Why?

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:14

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:13

There will never be enough willing doctors to make it a valid service, accessible to all. There might be a small handful but that won’t be enough. Most people don’t go into the medical profession to end the life of viable 35 week healthy babies. Most people see this as barbaric regardless of the woman’s circumstances.

Again, what are you basing this on, aside from wishful thinking?

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:16

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:14

Why?

Because I believe that while a fetus/baby/Steve is in someone else’s body then that person’s wishes should be paramount.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:16

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:14

Again, what are you basing this on, aside from wishful thinking?

I mean do you have a survey that the public disapprove of arson? No, but it’s safe to assume they do. There’s nothing wishful about it, there is very little appetite to extend the time limit on terminations. It isn’t even remotely on the radar.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:19

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:16

Because I believe that while a fetus/baby/Steve is in someone else’s body then that person’s wishes should be paramount.

What wishes? They’ll have to give birth regardless. The only issue is whether the baby is alive or not. Which, given she can walk out of the hospital and relinquish all responsibility for it, makes no material difference to her whatsoever.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:20

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:16

I mean do you have a survey that the public disapprove of arson? No, but it’s safe to assume they do. There’s nothing wishful about it, there is very little appetite to extend the time limit on terminations. It isn’t even remotely on the radar.

No, you want to assume they do. You’re making a statement solely on your own belief, nothing more.

The RCOG is not going to support decriminalizing abortion knowing they won’t be able to provide the services needed. There are doctors that would be willing to provide late term abortions, and again, there already are (it’s an assumption that those doctors have a moral opposition to aborting a healthy fetus).

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:21

Just had a look. Only 5% of the public want the time limit extended (and that’s extended, not abolished). No doubt you will find something wrong with the survey but it’s the best indicator we have so…

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2012/01/24/limits-abortion-time

Limits on abortion time? | YouGov

37% Brits think legal time limit should be reduced; 34% would keep current time limit of 24 weeks

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2012/01/24/limits-abortion-time

AIBot · 18/07/2023 23:21

The point is that it should be primarily a healthcare matter, not a legal one. If this woman had felt able to tell her healthcare provider that she had an unwanted 30+ week pregnancy without fear of legal consequences, the outcome may have been different.

Everyone loses in the scenario that has just happened.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:22

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:19

What wishes? They’ll have to give birth regardless. The only issue is whether the baby is alive or not. Which, given she can walk out of the hospital and relinquish all responsibility for it, makes no material difference to her whatsoever.

No, there are late term abortion methods that don’t involve a woman having to go through childbirth. Either way, I do believe it should be up to the individual in question.

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:24

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:21

Just had a look. Only 5% of the public want the time limit extended (and that’s extended, not abolished). No doubt you will find something wrong with the survey but it’s the best indicator we have so…

https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/articles-reports/2012/01/24/limits-abortion-time

What has that got to do with anything? Those are members of the public, not doctors.

again, the relevant medical bodies have come out in support of decriminalization.

Sweetashunni · 18/07/2023 23:25

whumpthereitis · 18/07/2023 23:20

No, you want to assume they do. You’re making a statement solely on your own belief, nothing more.

The RCOG is not going to support decriminalizing abortion knowing they won’t be able to provide the services needed. There are doctors that would be willing to provide late term abortions, and again, there already are (it’s an assumption that those doctors have a moral opposition to aborting a healthy fetus).

Decriminalising isn’t the same as providing the service, it just means women won’t face prosecution for doing it, like in this case. Given the public take a dim view of abortion generally, and an even dimmer view of late ones, it’s unlikely doctors will be clamouring to abort healthy term babies even if RCOG say that’s what should happen. Again, abstract versus reality