I'm not getting involved, just curious what other people think about this. Also details removed as potentially identifiable.
So I have a friend (we'll call her B) who is part of an activity group. They go away for weekends, do the activity, stay normally in a hostel/bunkhouse. Car-sharing is quite normal and this particular weekend B got a lift with another lady (we'll call her F). B doesn't drive. F has three young children and it was a logistical nightmare to organise getting away but she particularly wanted to do the activity on this weekend.
So on the first morning B manages to lock F's car keys in the car. B was warned not to do this and managed to do it anyway. F then had to wait for hours (in the middle of nowhere) for the RAC.
I asked B afterwards what they did for the day instead and it turns out B simply got a lift with somebody else and went on the activity anyway. Left F alone for the day. I was horrified but B can't see anything wrong with this. Just shrugged and said she couldn't do anything as it was F who needed to be there for the RAC. Said F was a bit cold with her on the drive home but B is mystified as to why.
Am I being unreasonable to think B should have waited with F, especially when B was responsible for locking the keys in the car? Just to add there is no financial penalty for either of them missing the activity, it's more the accommodation they all pay for.