Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To feel angry at celebrating the NHS

587 replies

TaylorSwifting · 05/07/2023 08:42

The NHS is falling apart and today people are all full of glee at the NHS yippee 75 years today, it’s making me so angry!!!!!!!!!
My family member has been diagnosed with cancer, 2 months down the line and has had no treatment and terrible delays for tests…..still yet to see an oncologist. 2 months!!!!!!!!! Family member only has pain management because us family have begged and fought to get it. It is an utter disgrace and I had no idea how bad things were until this awful diagnosis in our own family.
We are not alone / it hasn’t been a mistake or being lost in the system by accident! Record high cancer patient delays - this is what so many people are facing. I am in utter disbelief!
I won’t be celebrating today.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
PrincessTigger · 06/07/2023 07:30

You are kind of proving my point that all criticism is immediately dismissed as ignorant or right wing

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 07:46

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 06:06

OP (and everyone that agrees with the sentiment):
What do you think would happen if your organisation tried to do the same job with 25% less staff than was needed?

I don’t know that the ‘hero worship’ was particularly helpful but for god sake please don’t blindly join in the subsequent NHS bashing that has been so obviously whipped up by the right wing media at the behest of the Tory party who want to see the NHS dismantled and bring in private healthcare organisations in which they and their rich mates are shareholders.

Another conspiracy theorist.

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 07:52

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 06:52

@Lacucuracha
because the poster is suggesting this is the case:

The …… belief in its infallibility, refusal to take responsibility and always cast the blame elsewhere, cover-ups, ganging up against patients, refusing to listen, seeing sick people as a burden - all of these things are intrinsic to the NHS

She also suggests nothing changes when serious incidents happen. I cannot begin to tell you how ignorant and sweeping that statement is - NHS spend thousands of hours each week spent on governance, safety systems, data analysis, investigations, follow-ups…there is a duty of candour to patients and relatives…fault is accepted in many circumstances…medical professionals are disciplined etc.

things were not always this way (look at mid-staffs) but there have been enormous systemic changes in attitudes and cultures since then.

(but oh here’s an article……)

So I think it just defies reality to say that there aren’t problems with governance, accountability and how whistleblowers are dealt with in the NHS. The litany of scandals show problems in these areas again and again. But it is untrue to say these problems are not found in the private sector. They are and if anything they can be worse. The case of Ian Paterson who pursued his destructive career in both sectors is instructive.
some of these problems are problems within the culture of the medical and nursing professions and abolishing the NHS won’t cure them.

Teabutnotasweknowit · 06/07/2023 07:59

Blossomtoes · 05/07/2023 18:27

No they won’t. They’ll have a Band 6 nurse. Matrons are Band 8s and there are very few of them. About six in the Trust I worked for.

The trust I worked in until recently had a band 7 'ward manager' and several band 6 sisters. That was the norm for every ward.

cwanne · 06/07/2023 08:01

This is why it was so encouraging when Wes Streeting was talking about reform earlier in his time as shadow health secretary. It's probably only with a Labour government that we can have a proper conversation about structural change. However, he seems to have been brought back to heel by Starmer so I'm not hopeful.

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 08:01

The stories do not have and never have had any plans to “sell” the NHS to anyone, and nothing you have posted establishes they do. they have had 13 years in power to do it if they wanted!
as for the US trade deal, having combed through all the UK government publications on this at the time, I can confirm that selling it to trump was definitely not on the menu.

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 08:02

That should be the Tories of course.

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:08

Obviously Trump was talking out of turn.

'Speaking at a joint press conference, US President Donald Trump said the National Health Service would form part of negotiations over a possible future trade deal between the UK and US.
"When you're dealing in trade, everything is on the table," he said.
The president's comments come after the US ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, told the BBC's Marr programme that the United States would seek business access to the NHS as part of trade negotiations after Brexit.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-48516196

It pharma prices that they'd really want to get their hands on.

Donald Trump

Trump: 'NHS on the table in US-UK trade deal'

The president said everything would be up for negotiation in a trade deal between the UK and US after Brexit.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-48516196

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 08:08

@AgathaSpencerGregson Not sure why you are using the word ‘sell’. What is on the cards is insidious privatisation, contract by contract…

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:10

Personally I dont want politicians anywhere near decisions over the NHS.
Its their short termist policies that have driven it in to the ground in the first place.
Id be interested for health economists to trawl countries for options and provide that sort of information. No donors. No backroom deals. No 5 year plans.

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 08:25

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:08

Obviously Trump was talking out of turn.

'Speaking at a joint press conference, US President Donald Trump said the National Health Service would form part of negotiations over a possible future trade deal between the UK and US.
"When you're dealing in trade, everything is on the table," he said.
The president's comments come after the US ambassador to the UK, Woody Johnson, told the BBC's Marr programme that the United States would seek business access to the NHS as part of trade negotiations after Brexit.'
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/uk-48516196

It pharma prices that they'd really want to get their hands on.

If we’re taking the pronouncements of trump as proof of what Tory policy is or was, then I am afraid we have lost our minds.

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 08:33

@AgathaSpencerGregson
youll be saying the government isn’t systemically defunding and dismantling the bbc with support from the right wing media next. Tut these conspiracy theorists.

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:35

I remember when the Conservatives were pretty keen for a US trade deal - they needed the boost post Brexit. And it would be a huge mistake or just plain dumb to overlook the influence US Pharma companies have within US politics.

"If the United States can get a provision that allows it to influence UK drug prices into a trade deal with the United Kingdom, then, in theory,* *drug prices around the world could rise.
“The UK system is a benchmark in all sorts of ways. That might be specific decisions on pricing or whether it allows a drug to be used in the NHS,” says Mark Dayan, a policy analyst at Nuffield Trust, another health think tank. “Decisions made in the UK will be noticed internationally and could affect how decisions are made in other countries.”
Getting a sweet deal with the United Kingdom would provide another boost for both the drug lobby and US trade negotiators: it would set a precedent for any future US trade deals with other countries."

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/06/business/nhs-trump-trade-drugs-analysis-intl-ge19/index.html

US pharma companies really do want Britain to pay more for drugs | CNN Business

When President Donald Trump arrived in the United Kingdom this week, he landed bang in the middle of a huge political fight about the country’s National Health Service.

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/06/business/nhs-trump-trade-drugs-analysis-intl-ge19/index.html

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 08:40

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:35

I remember when the Conservatives were pretty keen for a US trade deal - they needed the boost post Brexit. And it would be a huge mistake or just plain dumb to overlook the influence US Pharma companies have within US politics.

"If the United States can get a provision that allows it to influence UK drug prices into a trade deal with the United Kingdom, then, in theory,* *drug prices around the world could rise.
“The UK system is a benchmark in all sorts of ways. That might be specific decisions on pricing or whether it allows a drug to be used in the NHS,” says Mark Dayan, a policy analyst at Nuffield Trust, another health think tank. “Decisions made in the UK will be noticed internationally and could affect how decisions are made in other countries.”
Getting a sweet deal with the United Kingdom would provide another boost for both the drug lobby and US trade negotiators: it would set a precedent for any future US trade deals with other countries."

https://edition.cnn.com/2019/12/06/business/nhs-trump-trade-drugs-analysis-intl-ge19/index.html

When you’ve found some actual evidence that it’s Tory policy to privatise the NHS and sell it to “the US” (who within the US?), you let me know.
til then I’ll keep working on those tinfoil hats.

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 08:46

@AgathaSpencerGregson how
about you stop straw manning (continuing to use the word ‘sell’).

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:46

I was simply pointing out what was in the US interests in any UK US trade deal.

It's not about selling the NHS. Just running it down and then giving access.

Far more complex and insidious than simply selling it.

cwanne · 06/07/2023 08:54

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:10

Personally I dont want politicians anywhere near decisions over the NHS.
Its their short termist policies that have driven it in to the ground in the first place.
Id be interested for health economists to trawl countries for options and provide that sort of information. No donors. No backroom deals. No 5 year plans.

This makes sense. We need to have a serious discussion about different systems and the trade offs.

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 09:01

@PrincessTigger
oh I missed your glorious last post. I have a list of about 50 things I can criticise about the NHS. Does that make me ignorant and right wing?

AgathaSpencerGregson · 06/07/2023 09:03

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 08:46

I was simply pointing out what was in the US interests in any UK US trade deal.

It's not about selling the NHS. Just running it down and then giving access.

Far more complex and insidious than simply selling it.

so you think that the fact that US pharmacy companies have an interest in the UK market is evidence that the Tories want to run the NHS down “insidiously”??
okaaaayyyy

PrincessTigger · 06/07/2023 09:18

TheHoover · 06/07/2023 09:01

@PrincessTigger
oh I missed your glorious last post. I have a list of about 50 things I can criticise about the NHS. Does that make me ignorant and right wing?

Apparently so.

Notonthestairs · 06/07/2023 09:41

"the Tories want to run the NHS down “insidiously”??
okaaaayyyy"

A decade of underfunding infrastructure, estates, IT and salaries and failing to provide a funded workforce plan (despite persistent pleas from the Health Select Committee), ignoring retention issues and failing to provide comprehensive Social Care plan - one of the key means to lift pressures on the NHS - doesn't exactly fill me with confidence, no.

Blossomtoes · 06/07/2023 10:01

Teabutnotasweknowit · 06/07/2023 07:59

The trust I worked in until recently had a band 7 'ward manager' and several band 6 sisters. That was the norm for every ward.

I don’t believe you. The NHS has 40,000 nursing vacancies, even when it didn’t that level of over staffing was unheard of.

Sweetpeasaremadeforbees · 06/07/2023 10:06

Personally I dont want politicians anywhere near decisions over the NHS.
Its their short termist policies that have driven it in to the ground in the first place.
Id be interested for health economists to trawl countries for options and provide that sort of information. No donors. No backroom deals. No 5 year plans.

I agree with that. But I don't believe that there is a plan by the Tories to privatise by stealth or otherwise. I assumed the handing out of contracts for certain services to private companies was done by local health authorities not by MPs. And the public service industry is notoriously shit at negotiating a good deal for taxpayers (see PFI deals for hospitals where companies can charge £100 for going in to change a lightbulb).