Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To wonder if Labour actually will be any better?

1000 replies

Baabaagreysheep · 30/06/2023 13:35

I think like most people I am keen to see the back of the current bunch, but I am not confident that anything will massively change for the better. Maybe that’s a bit pessimistic, but I feel that while some things will improve some will get worse - and some sort of at the same time, so I’m expecting my salary to go up but also my workload to go up!

Thinking back to when Labour were last in power it was another world, really. Interested in views.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
20
beguilingeyes · 05/07/2023 10:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Current Labour have never been in power, so how can they have a poor track record?

Badbadbunny · 05/07/2023 10:49

AdamRyan · 05/07/2023 10:39

No one ever said you lose 100% on ALL your wages - it's on the "extra" when you're wages/income is just above one of the stupid thresholds/cliff edges.
Someone did actually say some people were paying an effective tax rate of 100% which is what confused everyone....

Well that's just a misunderstanding on their part really. I think it's pretty obvious that someone talking about earning £101k doesn't mean they're paying £102k tax on it - pretty clear they're meaning they lose more than the £1k extra they earn in tax and loss of childcare.

Badbadbunny · 05/07/2023 10:52

beguilingeyes · 05/07/2023 10:40

Current Labour have never been in power, so how can they have a poor track record?

"Current" Labour havn't, no, but the Labour Party have a poor track record in their previous governments when in power.

Maybe they'll be better next time? Who knows? There's certainly no coherent tax policies/strategy coming out of them at the moment. Just more of the same "tax the rich" rhetoric, and from past form, they actually mean pretty normal people earning above average, but not millionaire levels of income, i.e. the squeezed middle!

If they're serious, they need to come out with a coherent tax strategy that's actually fair, workable, and will bring in the funds needed. Over to Rachel!!

Alyso · 05/07/2023 10:52

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Blossomtoes · 05/07/2023 11:01

Current" Labour havn't, no, but the Labour Party have a poor track record in their previous governments when in power.

Do they? The last one looked pretty good from where I’m standing. And that’s before you compare it to the absolute shambles of the current government.

Blossomtoes · 05/07/2023 11:03

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

And yet the Welsh keep voting for them. Bizarre, isn’t it?

Alyso · 05/07/2023 11:08

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Saywhatevernow · 05/07/2023 11:08

AdamRyan · 05/07/2023 10:39

No one ever said you lose 100% on ALL your wages - it's on the "extra" when you're wages/income is just above one of the stupid thresholds/cliff edges.
Someone did actually say some people were paying an effective tax rate of 100% which is what confused everyone....

They didn’t. You just didn’t read it properly and then we’re proven wrong.

whumpthereitis · 05/07/2023 11:09

AdamRyan · 05/07/2023 07:49

Oh dear me

I agree the middle and top on PAYE are squeezed, I don't agree the answer is to cut public services or lower the personal allowance so the lowest earners pay more tax.

The super rich don't pay PAYE and a lot of them spend a lot of money looking for ways to minimise their tax bill. Its been shown that "trickle down" economics doesn't work. So I don't see why this fear mongering about "millionaires leaving" exists as a reason not to tax them. Decent people pay their taxes. We should expect them to contribute fairly to the country they live in.

Tax the non doms. Close the loopholes, yes including private school VAT exemption. Tax dividends at income tax rates.

Don't sit there wringing your hands about the poor people earning over 100k having to pay higher tax on their bonus....it's ridiculous and out of touch (and I say that as a top rate tax payer)

It isn’t fear mongering though, it’s actually happening.

https://www.arabianbusiness.com/money/wealth/more-millionaires-leaving-uk-than-russia-report

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-20/millionaires-continued-to-flee-post-brexit-britain-in-2022

There’s a net outflow, and it’s not just tax revenue they’re taking with them. This is a problem, whether people want to recognize it or not, because it means the burden is increasingly pushed onto those lower down the ladder.

Like I said, capital is mobile. There will of course be wells that remain, but those will drain quickly. Britain needs to attract wealth, not chase it off.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 11:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Blossomtoes · 05/07/2023 11:18

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

That really isn’t true. More so now than at any point in my lifetime. I’d vote for Major’s government compared with the current iteration of Tories, they’re chalk and cheese. “They’re all as bad as each other” is such a lazy argument, designed to create inertia in the electorate.

Notonthestairs · 05/07/2023 11:18

Before the Brexit vote, the UK recorded net inflows, according to Henley. No data was published during Covid because the number of people migrating was so small. The dataset is compiled using countries’ investment-migration program statistics, interviews with advisers, media reports and real-estate transactions.

In part, the shift reflects the movement of well-paid traders and bankers from the City of London to financial centers in the EU like Paris and Milan. While there have been fewer departures in some industries such as banking than some had anticipated, there is a shortage of workers.
From the Bloomberg article.
So Brexit has an awful lot to answer for.
Wonder who proposed that.

AdamRyan · 05/07/2023 12:26

Saywhatevernow · 04/07/2023 22:01

Yes it is. Effective tax rate is over 100% for some. People who tip into 100k who have children, lose their personal allowance and childcare in one hit. Economists have been explaining to the Tories for a long time how this is hitting productivity and therefore tax take. Guess what? Earning less for working more makes people change their behaviour. Which is why Labour are now backtracking on the 80k threshold. It’s quite astounding how people don’t understand the nuances of our economy. If they did, it wouldn’t be such a mess.

Your post saywhat
Effective tax rate is over 100% for some. People
Don't blame me for your unclear communication and doubling down when asked questions about it.

It's almost like you wanted it to be misunderstood

Alyso · 05/07/2023 12:57

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

jgw1 · 05/07/2023 13:02

beguilingeyes · 05/07/2023 10:40

Current Labour have never been in power, so how can they have a poor track record?

But Jeremy Corbyn.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 13:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

jgw1 · 05/07/2023 13:10

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

It is the most rational reason for not voting for Labour in this thread so far.

GasPanic · 05/07/2023 13:12

jgw1 · 05/07/2023 13:02

But Jeremy Corbyn.

Corbyn got thrashed because he was economically illiterate.

His ideas were interesting, but the funding plan was madness. We would have been damaged much more than under Truss.

The latest Labour lot are effectively Tories, with a couple of sops thrown in to appease the left.

TBH, they don't have much choice in the matter. If they say they are going to squeeze the middle anymore they will not be elected. They can't borrow any more cash because the markets won't let them. So the only way for both sides if they want to raise spending is through growth. Which is why they both keep ranting on about it.

I think the danger with Labour is that once they are elected they will get a lot of pressure to revert to type and hose down the public sector with money.

SunnyEgg · 05/07/2023 13:15

whumpthereitis · 05/07/2023 11:09

It isn’t fear mongering though, it’s actually happening.

https://www.arabianbusiness.com/money/wealth/more-millionaires-leaving-uk-than-russia-report

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-01-20/millionaires-continued-to-flee-post-brexit-britain-in-2022

There’s a net outflow, and it’s not just tax revenue they’re taking with them. This is a problem, whether people want to recognize it or not, because it means the burden is increasingly pushed onto those lower down the ladder.

Like I said, capital is mobile. There will of course be wells that remain, but those will drain quickly. Britain needs to attract wealth, not chase it off.

I wonder at what point people will realise this isn’t good for them or anyone

Some will be glad to the end that they’ve left I suppose due to a kind of chippiness

On Wales continuously voting Labour I’m not overly surprised. If you get poorer, sicker, less education you might do that. It’s not something to try and emulate though

Alyso · 05/07/2023 13:22

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 13:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

whumpthereitis · 05/07/2023 13:25

SunnyEgg · 05/07/2023 13:15

I wonder at what point people will realise this isn’t good for them or anyone

Some will be glad to the end that they’ve left I suppose due to a kind of chippiness

On Wales continuously voting Labour I’m not overly surprised. If you get poorer, sicker, less education you might do that. It’s not something to try and emulate though

Some will, the pragmatists at least who are generally more willing to accept something they may not like if it’s worth the outcome. Fervent ideologues (of all stripes) however are at best loathe to acknowledge anything contrary to their worldview, and at worst more than willing to let everything crash and burn in the name of ‘the principle’.

Badbadbunny · 05/07/2023 13:42

Blossomtoes · 05/07/2023 11:01

Current" Labour havn't, no, but the Labour Party have a poor track record in their previous governments when in power.

Do they? The last one looked pretty good from where I’m standing. And that’s before you compare it to the absolute shambles of the current government.

Brown was a shambolic disaster with his tax/benefit faffing around, not being able to make his mind up, changing things as soon as he introduced them, not understanding the glaringly obvious foreseeable consequences of some of his changes.

TooBigForMyBoots · 05/07/2023 13:43

My sister's dogs would do a better job than the Tories.

Alyso · 05/07/2023 13:44

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread