Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

We need to start talking about population decline

792 replies

user4567890754 · 02/06/2023 22:15

The first signs of it are starting to show in the UK, with primary school closures. Secondary school closures will follow.

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/11158f12-0133-11ee-a364-04e704863f75?shareToken=5ef47b2b4776be376153089146c8bacf

Italy is a few years ahead of us.

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/may/01/plunging-birthrate-threatens-italian-schools

Japan shows where every country is headed - towards a crisis where they are on the brink of being unable to maintain social functions.

https://edition.cnn.com/2023/04/13/asia/japan-population-decline-record-drop-intl-hnk/index.html

And yet there are still people who think that we have a problem with overpopulation. It’s the opposite.

The school with one pupil: how falling birthrates are killing village primaries

Four generations of Ruby Booker’s family have been educated at Skelton Newby Hall, an idyllic village primary school in North Yorkshire.It was the autumn of 194

https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/11158f12-0133-11ee-a364-04e704863f75?shareToken=5ef47b2b4776be376153089146c8bacf

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
Froffycoffee · 03/06/2023 09:40

Reality25 · 03/06/2023 09:30

Care is just a sector that lacks economies of scale.

There are something like 5500 care operators in the UK and even the big players are spread over many many many different tiny sites.

What we need is a big player to enter the market properly, to build huge care blocks around big population centres (housing thousands each) and slash the price per week right down for state-funded care.

Issue is increasing numbers of people are requiring quite complex care. No longer for many settings are carers and some nurses with weekly GP visits or whatever sufficient; there needs to be teams of other AHPs along with more accessible facilities. Even with the high fees its not profitable enough for companies (they're businesses at the end of the day) and also not enough staff.

Florenz · 03/06/2023 09:43

Reality25 · 03/06/2023 09:30

Care is just a sector that lacks economies of scale.

There are something like 5500 care operators in the UK and even the big players are spread over many many many different tiny sites.

What we need is a big player to enter the market properly, to build huge care blocks around big population centres (housing thousands each) and slash the price per week right down for state-funded care.

Take some of the run down seaside towns and turn them into "silver cities" for elderly people with facilities and businesses catered to the elderly. Private housing as well as care homes to make the transition easier.

OutsideLookingOut · 03/06/2023 09:44

I don’t know. I agree population decline is going to be very very painful for us! But the benefits to generations after us could be great. What do you think OP? What would you prefer for your children?

Also I shiver at the thought of just creating children to care for others and be wage slaves who in turn need an exponential amount of future children to do the same. Is that what we want for the future? All while competing for ever depleting resource.

user4567890754 · 03/06/2023 09:45

In a sense it doesn’t really matter whether you think global population decline is a good thing or a bad thing. It is going to happen, whether we like it or not. No, it is not happening across the world YET, but it is in some countries and it is going to happen in the UK too. That’s why we need to start talking about it now! We can’t just put our heads in the sand and wait until it hits us. We need to start planning on a personal and a National and a global level. The birth rate in the UK has already collapsed, the demographic change has already started (more older people than young working people) and the population decline will inevitably follow.

The UK’s natural population will go into decline in 2025. Immigration can stop immediate depopulation, but there isn’t a baby factory in a far-off land that will continue to supply people indefinitely to prop up our society and economy. We need to come up with some other solutions, that don’t involve sacrificing reproductive rights or bumping off the elderly and disabled!

We are not breeding exponentially. Far from it! Birth rates are absolutely collapsing, worldwide. The most we can hope to do now with births is to perhaps slow the rate of decline so we can have a managed depopulation strategy and make the necessary social and economic changes, rather than suddenly dropping off a cliff.

I think the challenges of climate change, pollution, resource usage etc are well-known and discussed by many people, but a lot of people don’t appreciate that depopulation is also a massive issue that needs to be front of mind in future planning, probably because we’ve had decades of grim warnings about increasing populations.

https://www.ft.com/content/7a558711-c1b8-4a41-8e72-8470cbd117e5

Subscribe to read | Financial Times

News, analysis and comment from the Financial Times, the worldʼs leading global business publication

https://www.ft.com/content/7a558711-c1b8-4a41-8e72-8470cbd117e5

OP posts:
SunnyEgg · 03/06/2023 09:48

Successstory82 · 03/06/2023 09:26

Ghastly

Agree. That poster is welcome to remove their own voting rights not other people’s.

On op population decline won’t be nice but continuing the increase isn’t either

We’re also seeing medical breakthroughs, early days on cancer blood tests and Alzheimer’s disease. This could further increase age

OTH AI sounds like it will change the labour market

I think we decrease because what’s the alternative- continual increase

User135644 · 03/06/2023 09:48

Endlesssummer2022 · 03/06/2023 09:12

Most won’t agree but there is a potential solution. Nobody over the age of 80 is allowed to vote. That way they can’t vote as a block in ways which screw the young who they need to help them. Stops them voting against their own interests.

You can't do that (although I find it strange that 16-17 year olds are considered too naive/immature but the very elderly with often very slowed down cognitive functions and retired for decades are fine.

I think a lot of it is due to the number the likes of the Daily Mail have done on the older generations (those that still read newspapers). The fear they spread and pure propaganda has poisoned so many minds.

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 09:51

Most won’t agree but there is a potential solution. Nobody over the age of 80 is allowed to vote. That way they can’t vote as a block in ways which screw the young who they need to help them. Stops them voting against their own interests

That's quite extreme. I'd rather they gave the vote to younger people. I do take the point though the demographics impact voting outcomes.

SunnyEgg · 03/06/2023 09:51

There’s also issue of some countries becoming more inhabitable- I heard the median age of a country in Africa and was amazed at how low it was. Just googled and Japan at 48.6 years. Niger has the lowest average age at only 14.8 years.

It’s not going to be smooth, how difficult idk but climate disaster the other factor

Endlesssummer2022 · 03/06/2023 09:52

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 08:21

True but only in eighty years time.

I think economically we are feeling it now. Look at the nhs currently, it won't exist in 80 years if things continue!

Of course we’re feeling it now. I’m working FT and paying tax through my ears. Meanwhile the country is crumbling. One of the roads near my house looks like something you’d see in downtown Mogadishu, it looks like it’s been shelled, there are that many potholes. Where are the ever increasing taxes going? Then you get Labour announcing they will introduce even more taxes. Seriously thinking of emigrating to a younger country already, the workers can’t continue to be squeezed like this.

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 09:54

I think a lot of it is due to the number the likes of the Daily Mail have done on the older generations (those that still read newspapers). The fear they spread and pure propaganda has poisoned so many minds.

I think that's why so many think it's the fault of immigrants or the feckless having too many babies.

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 09:55

@Endlesssummer2022 if you can I would tbh. I'm encouraging my dc to do the same. We are lucky to be unaffected by Brexit.

User135644 · 03/06/2023 09:55

user4567890754 · 03/06/2023 09:45

In a sense it doesn’t really matter whether you think global population decline is a good thing or a bad thing. It is going to happen, whether we like it or not. No, it is not happening across the world YET, but it is in some countries and it is going to happen in the UK too. That’s why we need to start talking about it now! We can’t just put our heads in the sand and wait until it hits us. We need to start planning on a personal and a National and a global level. The birth rate in the UK has already collapsed, the demographic change has already started (more older people than young working people) and the population decline will inevitably follow.

The UK’s natural population will go into decline in 2025. Immigration can stop immediate depopulation, but there isn’t a baby factory in a far-off land that will continue to supply people indefinitely to prop up our society and economy. We need to come up with some other solutions, that don’t involve sacrificing reproductive rights or bumping off the elderly and disabled!

We are not breeding exponentially. Far from it! Birth rates are absolutely collapsing, worldwide. The most we can hope to do now with births is to perhaps slow the rate of decline so we can have a managed depopulation strategy and make the necessary social and economic changes, rather than suddenly dropping off a cliff.

I think the challenges of climate change, pollution, resource usage etc are well-known and discussed by many people, but a lot of people don’t appreciate that depopulation is also a massive issue that needs to be front of mind in future planning, probably because we’ve had decades of grim warnings about increasing populations.

https://www.ft.com/content/7a558711-c1b8-4a41-8e72-8470cbd117e5

Our population won't decline though (unless it's by choice). People will always want to come here, particularly given the effects of climate change.

There's plenty of the globe still breeding like rabbits.

Florenz · 03/06/2023 09:55

It doesn't matter how much tax we pay, as long as the public sector isn't reformed to make it much more efficient, things will keep getting worse.

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 09:56

There's plenty of the globe still breeding like rabbits.

🙄

SunnyEgg · 03/06/2023 09:58

Seriously thinking of emigrating to a younger country already

Where are you thinking?

user4567890754 · 03/06/2023 09:58

In terms of demographic change I think the short-term solution is for us to continue working in some fashion as long as we are physically able.

Increase rights to WFH and part-time to retain more older people for longer.
Investigate ideas like the 4 day week so that people aren’t burned out by 65.
Facilitate and encourage retraining and reskilling in middle age.
Get rid of the expectation of a long healthy retirement, start trying to achieve a work-life balance now.
If people have more leisure time they will have more time to serve their family and the community in other ways, caring for children and the elderly etc.
I think we’re going to need to be more community-minded and less individualistic in general.

OP posts:
Catchasingmewithspiders · 03/06/2023 09:59

There's plenty of the globe still breeding like rabbits.

Aka theres millions of women still without the access to reliable contraception and some of those women live in countries where marital rape is legal

Stravaig · 03/06/2023 10:00

OP, you're the person who is so fixated on the uncomfortable change bear charging towards you that you're completely oblivious to the meteor hurtling towards earth which will soon eradicate all life. It's human exceptionalism run amok.

Oliotya · 03/06/2023 10:02

Allthegoodnamesarechosen · 03/06/2023 09:26

The problem with immigration as a solution is that unless you are going to ‘incentivise’ ( kidnapp) young children, immigrants into established Western economies are not going to be of great economic use. Leaving aside the relatively few highly educated professionals , most people who want or need to leave their countries of origin will not speak the language of the country of destination. Many are illiterate in their own language, many who are literate are using a different script. This is without considering the very different cultural differences, often reinforced by religious conviction. So the society which results will be very different from the previous one. Not worse, or better, just different.

Before I am howled down as ‘racist’,I would like to explain why I believe this. I spent fifteen years living in France, we took early retirement ( no pensions) and bought a house and imported our money. It became clear that we had to speak French, or we could literally not manage to get the services connected! We both had o level French, and were educated to degree standard. I had fairly advanced ancient languages, so was used to different sentence construction and grammar.

It was very difficult. We achieved it by paying for private tuition, every week for three hours, and practising , speaking even at our stumbling level with as many people as we could. Most of the people we knew in a similar position (including Dutch, German and Belgian , not just insular Brits) found it equally difficult, but just gave up and retreated into little communities of their own ‘langue maternelle ‘.

I suppose earlier immigration into the UK faced less of this problem, because the Commonwealth ( Empire) had offered a common language and culture.

This isn't true though. There's more than enough English speaking, educated, qualified and intelligent people waiting to come here if we want them. We are already enormously underutilising the migrants that are here.
Of course it would be immensely immoral, and currently incredibly unpopular amongst voters, but we certainly could (for now) import enough of the "right" people.

PosseGalore · 03/06/2023 10:05

Jk987 · 02/06/2023 22:25

My first thoughts are that there are less people choosing to live in rural Britain. Many schools in towns and cities are over subscribed. Net migration is high and that can counteract a low birth rate. I don't think there's an issue but maybe the government should encourage more people to move to the countryside?

No. Schools in London are also closing because they are UNDERsubscribed, and we have been told that is because the kids are moving out of London. If you think they are moving to London and I'm being told that they are moving to rural areas where are they going? I didn't know that schools in London were closing until a close teacher friend told me about a few well known schools that have now closed. I was really shocked. I mean, schools closing in London?

SunnyEgg · 03/06/2023 10:06

Oliotya · 03/06/2023 10:02

This isn't true though. There's more than enough English speaking, educated, qualified and intelligent people waiting to come here if we want them. We are already enormously underutilising the migrants that are here.
Of course it would be immensely immoral, and currently incredibly unpopular amongst voters, but we certainly could (for now) import enough of the "right" people.

I agree with this although not sure about immoral as it depends a bit on how habitable the countries are over time

Also agree on voters not wanting it but wouldn’t we just face the same issue?

People arriving would age and we’d need to increase ages arriving lower down

Unless there is a time limit which some countries I suppose do with limited time visas

WakeMeUpWhenGoodOmensIsBack · 03/06/2023 10:06

Endlesssummer2022 · 03/06/2023 09:52

Of course we’re feeling it now. I’m working FT and paying tax through my ears. Meanwhile the country is crumbling. One of the roads near my house looks like something you’d see in downtown Mogadishu, it looks like it’s been shelled, there are that many potholes. Where are the ever increasing taxes going? Then you get Labour announcing they will introduce even more taxes. Seriously thinking of emigrating to a younger country already, the workers can’t continue to be squeezed like this.

What younger places are you talking about? The overlap between places with a significantly younger demographic than the UK and countries with a general attractiveness as good as or better than the UK (eg no wars or major terrorist insurgent threat) is pretty small unless you fancy life on a really tiny island nation.

Singapore if you can get a visa. Uruguay and Chile maybe, not sure what they're like at the moment. The fall in fertility rates is a worldwide phenomenon, and the countries where it isn't happening (eg Nigeria, Afghanistan) tend to have serious issues, because the reason they don't have declining birth rates is largely because they're unwilling or unable to educate their girls.

PosseGalore · 03/06/2023 10:06

hyggeb · 03/06/2023 09:51

Most won’t agree but there is a potential solution. Nobody over the age of 80 is allowed to vote. That way they can’t vote as a block in ways which screw the young who they need to help them. Stops them voting against their own interests

That's quite extreme. I'd rather they gave the vote to younger people. I do take the point though the demographics impact voting outcomes.

Yes, allow 16 year olds to vote.

Florenz · 03/06/2023 10:09

The voting age is the age of majority. Do you want to lower the age of majority to 16? There's more of an argument to raise it back to 21, than to lower it.

Catchasingmewithspiders · 03/06/2023 10:11

Florenz · 03/06/2023 10:09

The voting age is the age of majority. Do you want to lower the age of majority to 16? There's more of an argument to raise it back to 21, than to lower it.

But why does it have to be the age of the majority? Maybe it should be weighted more towards those with more to lose