All inner London is residential save for the city (with only 8000 inhabitants). Tourists primarily stay in inner London - population 3.4 million. That’s the number to calculate the true ratio of tourists/inhabitants. (I’ve already pointed out that that is only one way of analysing the impact of tourism, another factor is numbers per square mile.)
Visitors have increased by 44% in 10 years. In 2023 Tourists in London will spend 115 million nights here.
We can cope with it you claim. Can we? Our own population of 9.6 million, has increased by 3 million in 30 years. Not forgetting the unofficial undocumented population estimated to be around 400,000.
So London already has more inhabitants than its housing or infrastructure can cope with. Not just summer but all year round. 10% of people in London live in overcrowded conditions, rising to 16% in social housing.
In Cornwall the figure from the last available piece of data it was 2.5% in overcrowding and Cornwall’s rate is lower than the national average.
There are currently 15,000 households in Cornwall on the waiting list for housing. In London it’s 1.21 million - the average wait time is for council housing is 5-7 years.
I‘m well aware that areas of Cornwall are deprived and that the average salaries in Cornwall are lower than the national average. I’m also aware that Cornwall salaries are nonetheless substantially higher than the average salary in, for example, Greece, Spain or Poland - indeed £10,000 - £17,000 a year higher.
Cornwall, the Lakes and Skye are the only tourist destinations in the country - the Cotswolds, Devon, Somerset, Norfolk, Oxford, Cambridge, Bath and Edinburgh all attract their fair share. All these places have legitimate issues with tourist loads and its consequences. As of course do Italy, Spain, France and Turkey - the 4 top countries visited globally. However, much as it may be hard for these countries to deal with the volume of visitors, they are gracious and welcoming to tourists nonetheless.