It matters because it meant I looked at how attitudes and approaches to sexual material have changed. Rather graphic erotica aimed at women isn't new and has been around since the 80s. The House of O, for example, predates online porn but delves deeply into some of the more extreme acts of BDSM. But I am also well aware of what porn is available on the Internet
You calling sex workers "victims", BTW, shows that you are perpetuating harmful stereotypes. There are victims, yes, those who are trafficked and blackmailed. But many sex workers (sex workers can be male too, but hey don't let that get in the way of your crusade) do so because they enjoy sex, they enjoy showing off their bodies, they enjoy the fact they can make money from being comfortable enough to show off their bodies.
People absolutely need to be able to SAFELY explore their kinky sides and by encouraging SAFE explorations of kinks you inherently protect vulnerable people (again, young males are just as much victims but are much less empowered to speak out) because you make things like safe words, always check for consent, "Safe, Sane, Consenual" common knowledge and therefore make it harder for predators to use the excuse "Ah its just kinky, you can't say no because I'm the dominant" because people are clued in on the expectations and the rules around it.
The fact you only talk about women speaks volumes. Women are becoming more and more empowered to own their own sexuality and their own porn habits (Erotic novels are porn in their own right). I believe a decent proportion of those who consume gay porn, or things like Hentai are in fact female.
You want sex workers to be safe and protected? You don't make porn and sex work dirty and taboo. Because it drives it underground, away from regulations and discussions and common awareness over best practice.