@Lonelycrab Voter ID itself is not strictly about electoral fraud and has never been singled out as a reason for it.
It was the Electoral Commission who stated:
"Evidence collected by the Commission in its review of electoral fraud revealed that fraud is not widespread in the UK but, despite this, a significant proportion of the public remain concerned that it is taking place.
This has the potential to undermine confidence in the electoral system if not addressed. The Commission considered views on a number of options to tighten the electoral system against fraud and is today publishing its final report."
So, it's about increasing voter confidence in our electoral system against a gradually increasing degree of polarisation amongst the population.
Jenny Watson, the then Chair of the Electoral Commission, went on to state:
"Looking ahead, the time has come for England, Scotland and Wales to move towards a requirement for voters to produce ID at polling stations. This would strengthen the system and bring Great Britain into line with Northern Ireland and many countries where this is already in place."
www.electoralcommission.org.uk/media-centre/id-needed-polling-stations-recommends-independent-watchdog
We can see in the case of Northern Ireland that voter ID has led to voter confidence in the electoral system. Even though electoral fraud was not widespread. Same goes for European states.
Perception matters. This is usually referred to as "optics" and widely used along the political spectrum.
Voter ID has already been before the UK Supreme Court as well. In short, it is legal, constitutional and democratic just as it is everywhere else. Free Voter Authority Certificates ensure there is no democratic infringement on the right to vote. This is based on Northern Ireland's free voter ID card and it must be said that the Electoral Commission have long held Northern Ireland up as an excellent example of voter ID being successful.
Ad Hominem attacks are never productive in public discourse and easily leads to further, deeper polarisation of society. Who here wants an increasingly partitioned society?
Not me, hence my statement applies to all irrespective of political views.
Abuse of elected representatives as wrong as abuse of the layperson. Such behaviour ensures the democratic system we enjoy remains under sustained pressure and attack.
One day, the system will break under that burden. And the result will not be pretty.
Speech is not entirely harmless....