Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Well, I hated the coronation…

1000 replies

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 06:02

I can see I am in the minority on here but I found yesterday to be distasteful on a gigantic scale. To watch the most privileged people travel in gold coaches & be decorated with diamonds and gold that is priceless in the face of millions of people struggling to eat/heat their homes just feels so wrong.

Our primary school has just opened a food bank. There are kids & families in crisis- children coming into school hungry & smelly as families can’t afford to wash clothes (I am not joking) - living in Dickensian conditions. Some of the teaching staff use the foodbank.

Yesterday was a display of obscene wealth. The royals didn’t even pay for it- we did. How can we find money for that absolute nonsense yet we can’t find money for large swathes of the population to feed themselves.

While Charles was sitting there in his gold costume holding these priceless items, plenty of families weren’t eating. It made me really angry.

I am tired of all the arguments for a royal family- how somehow these displays are quaint. Yesterday was an obscene display of wealth, inherited privilege and everything that’s wrong with this country. Seems a conversation about the royals is long overdue.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:26

Or like the nearly 2 billion of personal wealth Charles has ?
That he doesn't pay tax on ?

The nearly 2 billion that he won't touch to pay for it even contribute to his PR party ?
That 2 billion?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/apr/20/revealed-king-charless-private-fortune-estimated-at-almost-2bn

treneton · 08/05/2023 11:30

PrettyMaybug · 08/05/2023 10:21

@AbreathofFrenchair

There won't be a "conversation" because for some reason, its super fashionable to hate the royal family and to blame them for all the wrongs in the UK from lack of food and heating to the disaster that is the NHS.

What people like the OP want is an echo chamber where you can project your thoughts as they are facts. Anyone that offers an explanation is shot down and told how they are supporting something outdated. You aren't prepared to listen or accept other opinions - so stop insisting "conversations" need to happen.

As for 'lots of people are not interested,' there's an awful lots of posts discussing it and desperate people commenting on how much they hate it etc. It's boring! Stop trying to be edgy and ignore it (like any normal person would who doesn't care about it.) It doesn't make you interesting.

And don't even get me started on people who insist they aren't interested and then go on to pretend they didn't know the Coronation was Saturday, as I've seen on posts on here. The whole world knows when it was, stop pretending it never made the news in Twickenham. 🤣

100% this. Brilliant post!

I have noticed something else over the past few weeks too... on all the Coronation bulletins on TV, and at the big Coronation Party I went to yesterday AND in the crowds around Buckingham Palace... There were 1000s and 1000s of people who were Hindu, Sikh, Muslim, and other faiths (other than Christian,) along with many black people, Hispanic, and Asian/South East Asian etc, who LOVE the Royal Family, and were tremendously excited about seeing them, and about the celebrations, and the whole kit and caboodle.

99% of the people who hate on them and come out with all the usual boring #notmyking shite do NOT fit any of those descriptions, and are all exactly the same type of people. The same ones who come out with 'people who voted for Brexit are racist gammon' and 'all boomers are scum who ruined the lives of the young,' and 'all people who vote Tory are thick bigoted c*nts.'

They're on every thread like this, dripping their poison and bile and vitriol, nag nag nagging and goading, and trying to get a rise out of people. What they don't realise is that we're laughing at them, and don't give a SHIT about their opinions. We also know the Royal Family is not going anywhere. They're here to stay. The haters, and their nasty vitriolic views are in a minority in this country.

I absolutely LOVED how the police dealt with the Anti-Royal Family protesters, when they were trying to protest at the Coronation. Kept them well out of sight and arrested them. Hilarious. Grin They didn't get the screen time and the TV gold moment they wanted. They only went down in history as people nobody knew or cared about. No-one even knows the names of ANY of them, and no-one cares! LOL. 😆(I saw them many hours after the Coronation by the way, on the news, being arrested by police earlier that day, they did NOT get any screen time during the Coronation, and as I said, no-one knows their names!)

THIS is what the goady, over privileged, left-wing, Royal family haters, look like. Definitely a running theme there Wink

Happy you enjoyed yourself though please could you clean up after yourselves.

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/05/07/litter-streets-london-coronation-anger/

Outrage over litter and abandoned tents on London streets after Coronation

The Mall resembled an abandoned campsite after a wet weekend at Glastonbury

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/royal-family/2023/05/07/litter-streets-london-coronation-anger

tuvamoodyson · 08/05/2023 11:32

Did you?

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:34

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:26

Or like the nearly 2 billion of personal wealth Charles has ?
That he doesn't pay tax on ?

The nearly 2 billion that he won't touch to pay for it even contribute to his PR party ?
That 2 billion?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/apr/20/revealed-king-charless-private-fortune-estimated-at-almost-2bn

No one in this country is taxed on their wealth.

We are all taxed on income from employment, property and assets we own.

The King and Prince of Wales pay income tax.

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:35

@PrettyMaybug

"They didn't get the screen time and the TV gold moment they wanted."

Tell me you have a clue without telling me you haven't a clue

The police action will be contested - on going publicity for republic
Informed fair minded people objected strongly to the police action and donations and membership of republic increased

The international media are reporting on the protests and will co tinier to follow the story

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:37

It’s taxpayer spending.

The argument that lost money is small fry in the context of other lost money is weak.

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:44

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:21

Do you genuinely think that had the money not been spent on the coronation the government would have spent it on pay rise for nurses etc?

The government is choosing public sector pay rates. They aren’t choosing between the coronation and school or NHS funding.

Government spending is not the same as household spending.

It taxpayers money we can choose to spend it on what we like. If sufficient taxpayers made it clear they didn’t want to fund any more coronations, that would be the end of them.

250 million could cover 100,000 or so operations.

1dayatatime · 08/05/2023 11:46

Everyone is entitled to their own opinions regarding the monarchy.

However one person's right to protest does not trump another person's right to celebrate or to try and disrupt that celebration.

Quite frankly the protesters are akin to a disgruntled ex who decides to try and disrupt the second marriage of their ex by protesting outside the church.

By all means campaign, protest or lobby for the abolition of the monarchy but to try and disrupt the one day event that the majority of the population wish to celebrate just looks sad and bitter.

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:47

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:44

It taxpayers money we can choose to spend it on what we like. If sufficient taxpayers made it clear they didn’t want to fund any more coronations, that would be the end of them.

250 million could cover 100,000 or so operations.

We as taxpayers don’t have any say on day to day tax spending.

We elect MPs to sit in the House of Commons on the basis of a broad spending policy only. We don’t elect the members of the government or the cabinet or the prime minister

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:48

@LittleBearPad

No.
Wealth is taxed by inheritance tax . The 'royals ' refuse to pay that

The income tax they do pay is voluntary and they decide themselves what to offer

Their finances are completely obfuscated. MPS have asked for clarity re the finances of the Dutchys - as because they are not submits to the same rules as the rest of us . They should be paying corporation tax but decide for themselves

It's corruption

amp.theguardian.com/uk-news/2023/apr/05/how-the-british-royal-family-hides-its-wealth-from-public-scrutiny

SunnyEgg · 08/05/2023 11:49

Listening to people speak on this I had sympathy for the police as they said a huge event went off incredibly well and security was good

I know they probably don’t need the public to say it but it must be a huge amount of work to ensure these events go as smoothly as they do

1dayatatime · 08/05/2023 11:51

@Mirabai

"It taxpayers money we can choose to spend it on what we like".

+++

No we can't - we don't get a choice in paying the £120 billion a year in interest payments on Government debt do we?

www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-11440971/amp/UK-national-debt-payments-set-total-120-4bn-year.html

Besides the link between representative democracy and voters getting an actual say in how the government spends taxpayers money is very weak.

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:52

@1dayatatime

The majority of the population was not interested !

Where have you been ? 15 % were 'very interested '

And protest is a right - not a concession

This has all backfired very badly

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:54

@SunnyEgg

Republic had been in talks and agreement with the police for months leading up to this

They had a dedicated area

You don't understand what this means for democracy and probably wont until it affects something you care about

Outofthepark · 08/05/2023 11:54

Novella4 · 08/05/2023 11:26

Or like the nearly 2 billion of personal wealth Charles has ?
That he doesn't pay tax on ?

The nearly 2 billion that he won't touch to pay for it even contribute to his PR party ?
That 2 billion?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/ng-interactive/2023/apr/20/revealed-king-charless-private-fortune-estimated-at-almost-2bn

That's what happens with a cult though isn't it, a bloke who lives forever and sits in a golden carriage isn't going to be asked to pay tax is he, he's too godlike etc 😄But because of the vast RF PR spend and new anti protest laws, they keep their army of cult followers who will go mental, like on this thread, savaging anyone who dares criticise dear leader! There's no point arguing when they're that far gone.

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:56

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:47

We as taxpayers don’t have any say on day to day tax spending.

We elect MPs to sit in the House of Commons on the basis of a broad spending policy only. We don’t elect the members of the government or the cabinet or the prime minister

We absolutely have a say in what we choose to fund via our elected representatives in parliament. If the majority of voters over a long period don’t want to fund the royal family, coronations and all, that will be the end of the royal family as a publicly funded institution.

Coxspurplepippin · 08/05/2023 11:57

'The majority of the population was not interested !'

At least 20M (obviously more because I'm pretty sure it wasn't just one person watching in each household, there were 3 in ours) tuned in to all or part of the coronation - or was everyone just tuning in to snark?

It's funny how opinion polls are a true accurate reflection when they confirm your particular view, but not worth the paper they're written on and 'no-one I know has ever been contacted by a polling company' when they don't.

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:57

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:56

We absolutely have a say in what we choose to fund via our elected representatives in parliament. If the majority of voters over a long period don’t want to fund the royal family, coronations and all, that will be the end of the royal family as a publicly funded institution.

Only in generalities. Not in detail.

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:58

1dayatatime · 08/05/2023 11:51

@Mirabai

"It taxpayers money we can choose to spend it on what we like".

+++

No we can't - we don't get a choice in paying the £120 billion a year in interest payments on Government debt do we?

www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/markets/article-11440971/amp/UK-national-debt-payments-set-total-120-4bn-year.html

Besides the link between representative democracy and voters getting an actual say in how the government spends taxpayers money is very weak.

As a democracy we choose what we prioritise and vote in the party that reflects that. The country voted to waste billions on Brexit and fuck up the economy - so that is what we did.

If voters prioritise NHS spending over the royal family politicians will follow.

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 12:00

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 11:57

Only in generalities. Not in detail.

Generalities and detail. Your local council represents you on a local level.

But you only need a generality of no more RF funding and that’s that.

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 12:01

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 11:58

As a democracy we choose what we prioritise and vote in the party that reflects that. The country voted to waste billions on Brexit and fuck up the economy - so that is what we did.

If voters prioritise NHS spending over the royal family politicians will follow.

The NHS is prioritised over the Royal Family. What a funny thing to say.

In 2021/22 the Department for Health and Social Care spent £190 billion.

Blossomtoes · 08/05/2023 12:01

We absolutely have a say in what we choose to fund via our elected representatives in parliament.

We don’t. We had absolutely no say in the government pissing money away on stamp duty holidays, eating out to help out subsidies or fraudulent bounce back loans which collectively make the cost of the coronation look like small change.

MrsSkylerWhite · 08/05/2023 12:02

Hotfootgoose · Yesterday 06:19
I know lots of families are struggling, but how much does it cost to wash clothes? People used to do this in a river years ago, so I doubt s blob of soap is the problem here.”

Good God, heard it all now. What a very stupid comment.

vera99 · 08/05/2023 12:02

Coxspurplepippin · 08/05/2023 11:57

'The majority of the population was not interested !'

At least 20M (obviously more because I'm pretty sure it wasn't just one person watching in each household, there were 3 in ours) tuned in to all or part of the coronation - or was everyone just tuning in to snark?

It's funny how opinion polls are a true accurate reflection when they confirm your particular view, but not worth the paper they're written on and 'no-one I know has ever been contacted by a polling company' when they don't.

I was snarking so you can take mine off... my takeaway is I need new oven gloves.

LittleBearPad · 08/05/2023 12:02

Mirabai · 08/05/2023 12:00

Generalities and detail. Your local council represents you on a local level.

But you only need a generality of no more RF funding and that’s that.

Splendid. The Royal Family can likewise decide no more Crown Estate funding to the government…

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread