Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Well, I hated the coronation…

1000 replies

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 06:02

I can see I am in the minority on here but I found yesterday to be distasteful on a gigantic scale. To watch the most privileged people travel in gold coaches & be decorated with diamonds and gold that is priceless in the face of millions of people struggling to eat/heat their homes just feels so wrong.

Our primary school has just opened a food bank. There are kids & families in crisis- children coming into school hungry & smelly as families can’t afford to wash clothes (I am not joking) - living in Dickensian conditions. Some of the teaching staff use the foodbank.

Yesterday was a display of obscene wealth. The royals didn’t even pay for it- we did. How can we find money for that absolute nonsense yet we can’t find money for large swathes of the population to feed themselves.

While Charles was sitting there in his gold costume holding these priceless items, plenty of families weren’t eating. It made me really angry.

I am tired of all the arguments for a royal family- how somehow these displays are quaint. Yesterday was an obscene display of wealth, inherited privilege and everything that’s wrong with this country. Seems a conversation about the royals is long overdue.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
27
Mirabai · 07/05/2023 13:01

dephlogisticated · 07/05/2023 12:58

I'm with you OP

I'm astonished that some people genuinely think this is about personal jealously, rather than an understandable political anger about the huge disparity of wealth and power that exists in this country and is perpetuated by the concept of hereditary monarchy.

I don’t care about the RF being wealthy. I care about U.K. taxpayer funding their coronations.

AP5Diva · 07/05/2023 13:11

Mirabai · 07/05/2023 13:01

I don’t care about the RF being wealthy. I care about U.K. taxpayer funding their coronations.

The reality is though that we U.K. taxpayers profited from the Coronation. We made money off the backs of the RF. Now will the Tories spend those profits on the most needy? Hell no.

Coxspurplepippin · 07/05/2023 13:15

Mirabai · 07/05/2023 13:00

RTFT. Please can posters please differentiate between POTUS: head of government and state, and a U.K. president who would be head of state only.

The ludicrous US political system in which the 2020 election campaigns cost $14 billion followed by expensive inauguration has got nothing to do with the U.K.

Sometimes republicans on these threads put forward the idea of, to keep the costs down, not having a separate HOS and head of government. No-one knows what an elected HOS in the UK would look like so it's perfectly conceivable it could be similar to the US version.

viktoria · 07/05/2023 13:21

I'm with you OP.
What's the legitimacy of the RF? Divine will?
Even the Pope gets elected...
How is the RF compatible with a modern democracy?
If Charles had died before William was born, Andrew would be king. Isn't that scary enough?

It's interesting to read all these comments bashing poor people.
The Tories really have done a great job making people hate on poor people.

Stravaig · 07/05/2023 13:24

It's worth reading the cover story in The Continent. The rest of the paper too!
Here's the cover itself.

Well, I hated the coronation…
Well, I hated the coronation…
Roussette · 07/05/2023 13:25

Coxspurplepippin · 07/05/2023 13:15

Sometimes republicans on these threads put forward the idea of, to keep the costs down, not having a separate HOS and head of government. No-one knows what an elected HOS in the UK would look like so it's perfectly conceivable it could be similar to the US version.

Not necessarily, can't imagine why?

Surely we'd look to other European countries that manage quite nicely. Not the US.

Roussette · 07/05/2023 13:29

That article @Stravaig Shock

I am glad the 734ct diamond in Charles's crown was mentioned. The Star of Africa and Africa want it back. It was passed to the Monarchy whilst under our colonial rule.

Mirabai · 07/05/2023 13:30

Coxspurplepippin · 07/05/2023 13:15

Sometimes republicans on these threads put forward the idea of, to keep the costs down, not having a separate HOS and head of government. No-one knows what an elected HOS in the UK would look like so it's perfectly conceivable it could be similar to the US version.

<facefuckingpalm> it wouldn’t be similar to the US version because the US version is head of the government and the cost is part and parcel of the vastly expensive US political system!

The closest comparison would be the president of RoI. The 2018 evening state reception and inauguration buffet cost €100,000.

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 13:31

@Stravaig that’s really interesting incl the bit about plundered gold & diamonds. People like to sweep colonialism & slavery under the carpet- it’s happened in this this thread too- its easier to accuse people of jealousy of their wealth than to acknowledge that a lot of their wealth comes at the expense of other countries that the Brits plundered. The Uni I work at has started decolonising the curriculum - sometimes I think the U.K. could do with doing the same!

Again there will be people come along and scream at me that it’s all ok and there’s no problem!

OP posts:
Novella4 · 07/05/2023 13:33

@TheColourofspring
Yes there's a lot of attempting to shut down debate

  • Trump will be the president
  • you are just jealous
  • give your money away

It doesn't help the royalist cause that they can't muster an argument

blackpearwhitelilies · 07/05/2023 13:37

Novella4 · 07/05/2023 13:33

@TheColourofspring
Yes there's a lot of attempting to shut down debate

  • Trump will be the president
  • you are just jealous
  • give your money away

It doesn't help the royalist cause that they can't muster an argument

This, along with how exhausting it is to see negative observations on social media. Give me a break.

Mirabai · 07/05/2023 13:39

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 13:31

@Stravaig that’s really interesting incl the bit about plundered gold & diamonds. People like to sweep colonialism & slavery under the carpet- it’s happened in this this thread too- its easier to accuse people of jealousy of their wealth than to acknowledge that a lot of their wealth comes at the expense of other countries that the Brits plundered. The Uni I work at has started decolonising the curriculum - sometimes I think the U.K. could do with doing the same!

Again there will be people come along and scream at me that it’s all ok and there’s no problem!

If will be impossible to brush the RF’s involvement in the slave trade under the carpet forever. The Duke of York’s Royal African Company was set up in 1660 and traded slaves internationally until 1730.

SunscreenCentral · 07/05/2023 13:39

I can't imagine bowing or curtsying to anyone. It seems a bit mad to me.
Nobody is better than me to the point that I'd bow to them.
I've grown up in a Republic though.

Laiste · 07/05/2023 13:48

I'd vote to abolish the monarchy and I haven't read a single post on any threads over the last 2 days which would change my mind.

Despite the daft whataboutery (HS2 on this one Confused??) from the usual cap doffers that always post repeatedly while laughing hysterically for some reason.

I see the vote here is now 54% OP not unreasonable. I'd say this reflects the views of the folks i know irl.

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 13:48

@Mirabai yes it’s convenient teaching of history I think!

Uni’s can recolonise their curriculum as they have control over what and how they teach- school curriculum is so heavily influenced by government agendas etc that I can’t see the curriculum being decolonised!

OP posts:
TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 13:49

*that should read Decolonise not recolonise 😅

OP posts:
Rednorth · 07/05/2023 14:17

Given our rivers and seas have record levels of pollution and sewage, I do not recommend this as a solution 🙄

WorldOutThere · 07/05/2023 14:21

KimberleyClark · 07/05/2023 11:57

My 17y was not interested one bit. Neither were her friends. Hopefully the apathy will continue.

Was that because it was a boring old man being crowned? Would their attitude have been different had it been William and Kate being crowned?

I don’t think so. I just think they see the royals as irrelevant. Their day to day lives preoccupy them much more: peers, study, future plans etc. Maybe the selfish teen world view?

mosiacmaker · 07/05/2023 14:21

Even without a current royal family we would still have all the history. Abolishing the monarchy wouldn’t be “throwing away history” as history would still be there….

France doesn’t have a royal family but we can all enjoy the history by walking around Versailles and imagining Marie Antoinette.

There is no need for the living (and slightly disappointing) example of history to be trotting about today asking us to swear fealty to it. Especially when you face the reality of ppeople like Prince Andrew.

The UK would still attract all the tourists to the castles and palaces without there being a current royal family. If anything, if it was consigned to history it might actually be better and more fun as people could wistfully imagine the olden times without seeing the reality.

Besides, if we were truly keeping to history, there is basically no chance that this particular line of succession would have been continued this long - at some point a distance cousin or like, Spain, would have beheaded one of the line of Hanover and we would have had a totally different royal family by now!

Once all the oldies die off, I doubt anyone will care very much. I can’t see this being particularly relevant past Kate & Wills -
I predict that we have an elected head of state by the time Prince George is to be king.

WorldOutThere · 07/05/2023 14:22

DarrellRiversCriminalBehaviourOrder · 07/05/2023 11:37

I would have preferred a coronation-lite.

It was a coronation-lite!

Really? Should it have been six hours long with more gold and jewels?!

Roussette · 07/05/2023 14:23

WorldOutThere · 07/05/2023 14:21

I don’t think so. I just think they see the royals as irrelevant. Their day to day lives preoccupy them much more: peers, study, future plans etc. Maybe the selfish teen world view?

My DCs in their 30s and their partners are literally totally disinterested on the verge of being Republican. The RF means nothing to them and they don't get that from me, they are very forceful in their opinions whether they align with mine or not!

WorldOutThere · 07/05/2023 14:29

Roussette · 07/05/2023 14:23

My DCs in their 30s and their partners are literally totally disinterested on the verge of being Republican. The RF means nothing to them and they don't get that from me, they are very forceful in their opinions whether they align with mine or not!

Well we bring our kids up to think for themselves. And then they definitely do!

Roussette · 07/05/2023 14:30

WorldOutThere · 07/05/2023 14:29

Well we bring our kids up to think for themselves. And then they definitely do!

Oh yes! We have heated discussions at times!

I enjoy them on the whole. Although one of the DCs is very forthright on her opinion... too much so, bless !

Rednorth · 07/05/2023 14:33

mosiacmaker · 07/05/2023 14:21

Even without a current royal family we would still have all the history. Abolishing the monarchy wouldn’t be “throwing away history” as history would still be there….

France doesn’t have a royal family but we can all enjoy the history by walking around Versailles and imagining Marie Antoinette.

There is no need for the living (and slightly disappointing) example of history to be trotting about today asking us to swear fealty to it. Especially when you face the reality of ppeople like Prince Andrew.

The UK would still attract all the tourists to the castles and palaces without there being a current royal family. If anything, if it was consigned to history it might actually be better and more fun as people could wistfully imagine the olden times without seeing the reality.

Besides, if we were truly keeping to history, there is basically no chance that this particular line of succession would have been continued this long - at some point a distance cousin or like, Spain, would have beheaded one of the line of Hanover and we would have had a totally different royal family by now!

Once all the oldies die off, I doubt anyone will care very much. I can’t see this being particularly relevant past Kate & Wills -
I predict that we have an elected head of state by the time Prince George is to be king.

Imagine how much long term financial gain could be had if they turned Buckingham Palace into a luxury hotel!

People would pay thousands per night to sleep in the same room as royals once did.

TheColourofspring · 07/05/2023 14:47

@Novella4 and yea, I was told that I wasn’t critical thinking enough in my argument but I haven’t seen many arguments making a strong case for the monarch either to be honest!

OP posts:
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.