The funniest part of it is that Musk didn't actually want to buy Twitter in the first place - it all started in a similar vein to Trump saying he'd buy Greenland. He was just trying to stir up trouble, to try to force them to allow more behaviour along his own political lines...that's why he kept throwing up spurious excuses as to how bad the bot problem was (for example), so he could get information on it out of them and then publicise it. Of course, you can only do that if you're actually serious about buying, which he wasn't...
...and then the courts forced him to buy it, which has exposed the fact that he hasn't got the first clue what he's doing. He fired a bunch of the most experienced C-Suite folk in the industry, and a couple more left, and now he can't do the one thing that's saved all the businesses he's bought into in the past - hire people who know more than him to make it work in spite of his behaviour.
What we're seeing is somebody who has no experience in software management, social media platform provision, or large-scale platform management try to micromanage all of these things and trying to show the world he's amazing at everything, while the world's watching with nowhere to hide.
I think it's hilarious. I mean...he never even understood the one critical part of Twitter (that a lot of folk here seem to miss too) - it actually panders to neither side of the political divide, but rather focuses your feed on the things most likely to make you engage. That means polarisation - you'll be shown stuff that either makes you very happy or very angry, and nothing in between.
That's why the left always think the place is a cesspit of ultra-right-wing nutcases, and the right think its a censorship-heavy cesspit of ultra-left-wing lunatics.