Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Christmas train strikes

449 replies

Darthwazette · 05/12/2022 19:58

AIBU to wish the train strike situation could just be sorted out?

Theyve just announced strikes right over Christmas. My family were coming to stay with me and now they can’t. I’ve had to cancel so many visits and trips since these strikes began. I wish they’d just reach an agreement already.

OP posts:
youhavenoshameonyourface · 05/12/2022 23:04

mimillion · 05/12/2022 22:41

@youhavenoshameonyourface

Those who break a strike known by everyone else as a scab are often treated horrendously by those who have taken strike action, name calling, bullying, shunning, getting the worst shifts etc etc. I have worked for a similarly powerful union and remember being so relieved that I was on leave on the few occasions the members went on strike. At that point I just couldn't afford to lose a days pay or more.

Nasty cunts. Are we, as the public, supposed to respect unions despite this overt bullying, controlling and aggressive behaviou?

jamimmi · 05/12/2022 23:05

Not convenient, not helpful but fully support the rail workers. Struggled to get back up north via avanti last week who are now so unreliable you can't use them but the government won't act there. Mick lynch talks alot of sense.and the government as usual are failing to negotiate just bullying and spinning. I wonder how many strikes.it.will take to remove them? We have rail, courts, nurses, paramedics, mail all going out and most other health professions about to.go too. The.only comman denominator here is the government. That says it all.

Livinginanotherworld · 05/12/2022 23:17

hamstersarse · 05/12/2022 21:23

The union leaders still get paid on these strike days….just saying

Actually Mick Lynch is donating his pay on strike days to the strike fund. A man with integrity.

FaffingChampion · 05/12/2022 23:18

Rowthe · 05/12/2022 21:38

This is what I dont understand.

They want to improve the service for the passengers. Why are people so against it?

That’s not what they’re striking about - the unions are their to defend jobs, pay and conditions. Not to defend the service for passengers. Obviously it helps to the public on side by highlighting areas of the dispute that align with passengers interests, but to be honest I think given the choice many people would take cheaper fares and fewer staff.

That’s not to diminish the role of the unions - they have an important role but it’s not defending passengers rights.

I think unions can be unreasonable but that’s necessary when organisations behave unreasonably too. Basically capitalism sucks.

Stompythedinosaur · 05/12/2022 23:20

Middlered · 05/12/2022 22:08

The strikes are really affecting us. DH travels to London for hospital treatment. He can travel by himself by train if I get him on and off the train (station has been unmanned for years - ticket office open some mornings for 2 hours, but discourage you from using them so book online or buy ticket from a machine). But with the train strikes I have to drive him which takes 4 hours instead of 1.5 hours, and we both lose a days pay instead of one of us. Plus we have to pay someone to have DC before and after wrap around school club as our day away is so long. The total cost to access essential care is massive.

It seems to me that the people affected by the strikes have absolutely no control over what deal the unions can broker. Therefore I don’t think striking serves any point and all it does is spread misery and ensures that people with a choice increasingly avoid using the service.

I feel for people negatively effected by the strike, but it isn't true to say the strike will have no effect. Striking has brought about some significant steps forwards in workers rights in the past that we all benefit from (equal pay for women being one).

I support the railworkers. No one strikes without significant reason. I hope they get what they are asking for.

carefulcalculator · 05/12/2022 23:23

Figmentofmyimagination · 05/12/2022 22:46

There is a high level of public support for rail renationalisation, which I agree with the RMT is a very good idea.
fullfact.org/economy/do-public-want-railways-renationalised/

I think it will come because the privatisation project has so clearly failed. The taxpayer is losing out, the passenger is losing out, the worker is losing out - only the shareholders are benefitting. It is an easy area of renationalisation - as each TOC fails, do not renew.

jamimmi · 05/12/2022 23:27

carefulcalculator · Today 23:23

Figmentofmyimagination · Today 22:46

There is a high level of public support for rail renationalisation, which I agree with the RMT is a very good idea.
fullfact.org/economy/do-public-want-railways-renationalised/

I think it will come because the privatisation project has so clearly failed. The taxpayer is losing out, the passenger is losing out, the worker is losing out - only the shareholders are benefitting. It is an easy area of renationalisation - as each TOC fails, do not renew

They can start with the disaster that is Avanti!. The west coast form london to Glasgow would be thrilled!

username11122 · 06/12/2022 04:25

Livinginanotherworld · 05/12/2022 23:17

Actually Mick Lynch is donating his pay on strike days to the strike fund. A man with integrity.

What is this used for?

Daisy03 · 06/12/2022 05:00

Username11122 it goes to a hardship fund for those in extreme financial difficulties

SecretVictoria · 06/12/2022 05:15

mangomary · 05/12/2022 20:16

Strikers still get some money from the union fund don't they?

I think rmt are a bunch of twunts

Not always, you have to apply to a hardship fund and a committee decides if you get funds.

As an aside, I am an RMT ‘twunt’ (cheers for that) who is up at this time ready to go to my FT rail job. For which I earn less than half of what the media claim is the ‘median’ salary on the railway.

DdraigGoch · 06/12/2022 05:38

donttellmehesalive · 05/12/2022 21:31

Luckily it's not compulsory. I don't suppose you'll want to say where you work but I expect people would have an opinion if you did.

To be fair, given how bad services at my operator were over the summer (critically overcrowded with people left behind), I started saying that I was a P&O executive as it was less embarrassing.

Then Avanti fell apart and my employer didn't seem so bad after all.

DdraigGoch · 06/12/2022 05:54

SueVineer · 05/12/2022 21:35

Train drivers are already overpaid for what they do sue to militant unions. I don’t take the train anymore as it’s just too unreliable. They will eventually do themselves out of a job.

Wages have to be high and conditions good to retain staff (training replacements would be expensive). TPE are losing drivers hand over fist to freight hauliers.

Zanatdy · 06/12/2022 06:13

jamimmi · 05/12/2022 23:27

carefulcalculator · Today 23:23

Figmentofmyimagination · Today 22:46

There is a high level of public support for rail renationalisation, which I agree with the RMT is a very good idea.
fullfact.org/economy/do-public-want-railways-renationalised/

I think it will come because the privatisation project has so clearly failed. The taxpayer is losing out, the passenger is losing out, the worker is losing out - only the shareholders are benefitting. It is an easy area of renationalisation - as each TOC fails, do not renew

They can start with the disaster that is Avanti!. The west coast form london to Glasgow would be thrilled!

I travel a lot from Euston to Chester or to Liverpool and since it changed to Avanti it’s been diabolical. There are very few direct trains now from London to Chester - and vice versa, which is really inconvenient, especially when I’ve got my dog and have to change at Crewe. I’ve never heard a good word said about Avanti. It’s almost as bad as Southern rail. Almost. But not quiet

donttellmehesalive · 06/12/2022 06:45

"It seems to me that the people affected by the strikes have absolutely no control over what deal the unions can broker. Therefore I don’t think striking serves any point and all it does is spread misery and ensures that people with a choice increasingly avoid using the service."

I am sorry for the inconvenience to your dh but I think you are wrong that striking serves no purpose and many on here would do well to educate themselves on how striking has improved working conditions over the years.

DdraigGoch · 06/12/2022 06:56

Chesneyhawkes1 · 05/12/2022 22:29

@MarshaBradyo I think there are other ways the railways could save money.

As with most industries I feel there are ways money is wasted. I wouldn't get into detail on a forum.

There are always ways huge businesses can make savings. But they never start with the top do they. It's always taking away from the workers at the bottom first.

The demand is less, Monday and Friday are certainly quieter on the trains.

Some days the trains are packed though. Like they used to be. And weekends still very busy.

Ultimately I feel the TOC's are willing to negotiate with the unions but they aren't being allowed to do so. Certainly that was the impression given during our recent pay talks.

I would start by electrifying. Electric trains with brushless AC motors require far less maintenance and far less energy cost than diesel. They also cause no pollution at the point of use, which would improve air quality in our cities (anyone been to Birmingham New Street) and help towards net zero targets. By massively improving acceleration they cause a "sparks effect" which really drives up demand.

It requires capital investment of course but the long term gains are significant.

user1471434829 · 06/12/2022 07:10

Demand is down and the vast majority of passengers would prefer lower fares and less pointless ticket office staff. If the catering on board isn't profitable, then it needs to be shut down. Someone working in train catering should be able to get a job in normal retail/hospitality fairly easily at the moment. Its ridiculous they are expecting to get a pay rise/no redundancies when less people are using the service.

I completely support nurses, docs, teachers striking. But not the rail workers and plenty of people feel the same.

Theluggage15 · 06/12/2022 07:30

Every household subsidises the railways by £500 even though of course the vast majority don’t use them. Every job advertised is massively oversubscribed, there’s no problem with getting staff. They are extremely well paid for what they do. None of them lost money during the pandemic, on 100% of salary unlike many of the poor sods who pay for them.

They are a bunch of dinosaurs living in the seventies. They’ve lost loads of customers since the pandemic but expect to be paid vastly more. Just unbelievable that they think they should be indulged at the expense of others.

DdraigGoch · 06/12/2022 07:35

Chesneyhawkes1 · 05/12/2022 22:53

@mimillion when I started my job almost 19 years ago, there was someone there who worked during the 1981 strikes. They still weren't talking to him.

There is absolutely no way I would cross a picket line.

That's nothing compared with the Great Strike of Penrhyn. Generations later there were still families still not on speaking terms, and that was an all-out strike starting in November 1900 that lasted for three years.

Nid oes bradwr yn y tÅ· hwn

Metabigot · 06/12/2022 07:38

mimillion · 05/12/2022 22:29

@Hexcode

" But that's their choice! I fully understand the reasons but when things are this tight it's hard to feel sympathy "

You don't really have a choice when you are in a union like this one, the consequences of breaking the strike are far worse than missing a days pay.

D'uh! The members of a union vote whether to strike. Did you really not know this?

No one holds a pistol at their head forcing them to vote in favour of strike action.

Indoorvoicesbluey · 06/12/2022 07:41

My husband is a signaller for network rail so striking.

every time they strike he loses a days pay. It’s soon adding up each month. I feel for those working over Xmas and have lost out on 3x their pay.

Indoorvoicesbluey · 06/12/2022 07:42

Metabigot · 06/12/2022 07:38

D'uh! The members of a union vote whether to strike. Did you really not know this?

No one holds a pistol at their head forcing them to vote in favour of strike action.

Actually that’s bulltshit.

my husband said that if they don’t stoke and go against the grain the rest of his team would never speak to him again. His work life would be made horrific.

Brefugee · 06/12/2022 07:44

Have only read the first page.

First off: there were no agressive posts previous to the "why so agressive". You need to be more resiliant if you think those two answers are agressive.

The strikers have been offered an effective pay cut. They have rejected that offer. The railways are paying out to their shareholders and there's the problem. A privatised company has a duty first to the shareholders.

Which means: nationalise the railways, and that problem won't be as prominent.

Those complaining about not getting a pay rise: are you in a union? why not?

Don't fall for all the crap being spouted about how much train drivers earn. The RMT doesn't represent train drivers. And yy to the point about accessibility and safety. This is the best reason to support the strikes.

As they say: All i want for Christmas are the Means of Production.

Metabigot · 06/12/2022 07:45

Indoorvoicesbluey · 06/12/2022 07:41

My husband is a signaller for network rail so striking.

every time they strike he loses a days pay. It’s soon adding up each month. I feel for those working over Xmas and have lost out on 3x their pay.

Are you saying that if colleagues are striking then he loses pay even if he is not, as he isn't needed those days? I doubt it, as that would be breach of contract and I assume he has contracted hours.

Metabigot · 06/12/2022 07:48

Indoorvoicesbluey · 06/12/2022 07:42

Actually that’s bulltshit.

my husband said that if they don’t stoke and go against the grain the rest of his team would never speak to him again. His work life would be made horrific.

*Actually that’s bulltshit.

my husband said that if they don’t stoke and go against the grain the rest of his team would never speak to him again. His work life would be made horrific*

How would they know? The vote for strike action is done online, its anonymous, colleagues wouldn't know which way someone else voted.

The bullshit is all yours, dear

Coconut212 · 06/12/2022 07:49

Zanatdy · 05/12/2022 20:59

Well my company is also receiving crap pay but the majority of staff will not be striking as there are essential public services to be kept operational. I don’t see why people can’t be upset that they can’t reward their own staff this year, the rail company and royal mail are not the only people struggling with low pay. Sorry I forgot on mumsnet you can’t be disappointed with such things. Sure half of you would be moaning if you actually travelled on trains and had your life’s constantly disrupted. It’s ok to support strikes when they don’t impact you isn’t it?

No the issue is people sit in jobs and accept the poor pay, conditions and the risk to their jobs. Everyone has the right to good pay, conditions.

everyone clapping for the NHS but they’ve supposed to accept an awful pay rise, everyone cheers on the fire brigade I wouldn’t run into a burning building but again they’ve to accept an awful pay rise.

instead of cheering these people on for fighting for a better life or actually their pay rise being the same as inflation we moan our lives are being disrupted for lunch

Swipe left for the next trending thread