I'll preface this by saying that DH and I had spoken, and acknowledged, that he wouldn't get any holidays with us this year. During this conversation he made no suggestions and just approached it with more of a "ah bad luck that" attitude.
So, as the title suggests, I booked a holiday for DC and I over the Easter break (a UK getaway for 4 nights) but didn't include DH.
Both DH and I have set holidays, we cannot take them at other times. I am term time, meaning I have all the school holidays. DH works on a rota that has his days off plus annual leave accounted for, and bar a day here or there, it is nearly impossible to swap shifts with someone.
This year none of DHs holidays fall over the term time - something he enjoys as it means he gets 2 weeks off when I'm at work at the kids are at school. 10 whole days, 9 to 3, of peace and quiet.
When we spoke about this I said I wouldn't not be going away because he wouldn't be there and he agreed. We had this issue a few years ago, with a larger family holiday, and DH had to drop out as he couldn't swap his shifts with anyone.
Fast forward to my booking of a holiday, just a 4 night UK break in Easter, and DH is now in a massive huff because "I should have waited for him to see if he could swap," or I "should have just booked him in case". I've only paid the deposit as there were Black Friday discounts and it was a very good deal. As I said, none of our previous conversations took this turn and he was more than happy to have time alone, in theory, when discussing it. I'm also not clairvoyant and had no idea that his "yeah it's rubbish we won't be off together" also meant "I'll try to swap shifts despite this not working before".
Now DH is in a bit of a huff.
However I don't believe I was in the wrong, we had conversations.
So AIBU to not have included him?
Yanbu - not unreasonable, why would you include him after all of the above?
Yabu - are unreasonable, why would you not include him?