One final attempt to contextualise this discussion. Having taken part in (legal) protests with Extinction Rebellion, I posed a theoretical question about taking part in a future protest action with the risk of arrest.
I have no problem with people disagreeing about the idea of non-violent direct action – that’s the whole point of having a discussion on social media. For those of you who expressed your views in a reasonable way, I thank-you and have taken on board your comments.
However, there are a series of responses to thinking about a possible future action, that I think are unjustified. NVDA takes many forms and does not necessarily mean blocking roads. To recap:
@Prinnny You stopped a man trying to get to the hospital to see his dying mother. To be honest you’re lucky it happened down south as northerners would have dragged yous all out the way and hoyed you in the Tyne
@Alexandernevermind Pooring poo over a Captain Tom memorial didn't do you any favours, nor did trying to destroy a Van Gogh, and what was custard pieing King Charles's wax work all about, he's long been a environmental advocate?
@CourtneeLuv Most people think you are behaving like cunts.
@Theluggage15 The middle class handwringing over this issue is pathetic. If the U.K. disappeared tomorrow it would make absolutely no difference to the climate. But yeah stop people getting to work, delay ambulances while you fuck about and piss people off.
@Biker47 Blocking me getting to work or where I need to be isn't going to get me on your side, I'd just think you're a cunt. Same goes if you throw some soup over a painting, grade A cunt.
@fernfen XR and Just stop oil are pathetic always have been and always will, spoilt little brats desperately looking for attention and achieving nothing.
@CMZ2018 I hope you get an absolute leathering off the public then locked up.
@TheSomersetGimp Fucking twats the lot of them