Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To wonder how a £36k a year education can meet DS’s needs if a £250k one can’t?

305 replies

GoneBatty · 23/10/2022 00:40

Private residential SEND college (out of area) costs £250k a year. They are saying DS’s needs are too high for them to manage.

Council are saying a £36k a year local outreach provision can meet his needs.

It’s all very fishy as SEND college at first said they felt they could meet DS’s needs so we visited, all was OK. As as soon as the council (who will have to fund it) got involved, college backtracked and said they couldn’t meet his needs.

They have given nonsensical reasons which I have mitigated numerous times. Both the college and council have told blatant lies and I’ve caught them out in two big ones!

Now we have reached Tribunal the college is suddenly full which was not an issue a few months ago so know they’re lying again as they would know numbers of students months in advance due to Tribunals and the time it take to get funding. Also most Tribunals due to take place over the summer were postponed for this age group.

AIBU to suspect the council has given the college a backhander to say they can’t meet his needs? It would cost council £750k for a 3 year program. They could have given a £100k ‘investment’ per se? Still saves a lot of money!

There is literally no other provision like this in the country. I have approached 21 other colleges, local and out of area. DS has had no proper provision for over a year and he is running out of time as age 20 - EHCP is to 25.

Do I sound nuts (I feel it)? Can this actually be possible?

OP posts:
hiredandsqueak · 23/10/2022 11:11

Lizthelettuce · 23/10/2022 10:53

Okay well I’ve told you why it is that they have to do that.
So what’s your theory?

Why do you think they are choosing to act unlawfully and choosing to spend vast amounts of money fighting tribunals they know they are going to lose?

It's irrational but it happens. The firm of barristers our LA used to use against unrepresented parents will no longer represent them because they were losing over 98% of Tribunals and their reputation was being slashed. Of course they have now enlisted a new Barrister's chambers instead.
For us in the East Midlands, in one of the top three worst LAs in the country according to SOSSEN, they are staffed by self serving incompetents who have no consideration for the CYP at the heart of the fight they are just high on the perceived power they hold.
Phone lines are still closed "because of Covid" all emails are almost always on out of office, legal timescales are routinely ignored, the only way to get a response is to make a formal complaint that they drag out for as long as possible or enlist the aid of a solicitor.
An example from only last week, a friend has been waiting for an Ed Psych assessment as part of the EHCNA. Made a formal complaint, answered by lead SEND arguing the 20 week timescale was in fact 140 working days and so not overdue. Escalated to stage two and at the same time got a solicitor to threaten JR. Ed psych offers appointment for this Monday and then Tuesday when Monday wasn't possible. So there is availability to the parents who can afford the costs incurred by using a solicitor.

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:12

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

deliverooyoutoo · 23/10/2022 11:13

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Fuck me.

dontdoubtyourself · 23/10/2022 11:14

Excuse me if I've missed this,

But why can't the local outreach centre meet your ds needs?

Councils always always always go with the closest to your home address, no matter how fancy one further away is.

It really is postcode lottery.

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 23/10/2022 11:15

Are you actually bloody serious. Not a serious disability. Jesus fucking christ this thread is an absolute cesspit of ignorant disablism

LaGioconda · 23/10/2022 11:15

Worthyornot · 23/10/2022 10:56

How is that even comparable. One is saving a life. Are you serious? I would rather it goes to funding cancer treatment.

So where do you draw the line? What if the cancer treatment simply prolongs life but won't save it? Should it be withdrawn? What if the cancer treatment leaves that person alive but severely disabled requiring very expensive care? Should we treat them but then refuse to provide care?

Thatsnotmycar · 23/10/2022 11:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

You cannot be serious!

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:16

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 23/10/2022 11:15

Are you actually bloody serious. Not a serious disability. Jesus fucking christ this thread is an absolute cesspit of ignorant disablism

But tell me where the op details anything that would indicate a serious disability? Instead she details the opposite!

Morph22010 · 23/10/2022 11:17

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I think she mentioned he was self harming which we don’t know the extend of but it could be quite serious and life threatening. If he has no additional needs then he wouldn’t have got an ehcp in first place.

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:18

Morph22010 · 23/10/2022 11:17

I think she mentioned he was self harming which we don’t know the extend of but it could be quite serious and life threatening. If he has no additional needs then he wouldn’t have got an ehcp in first place.

Ah I see. Missed the self harm

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:19

I just sae

@TwitchyJerk No violent behaviour ever. Not even with brothers. No police or SS involvement until I fought for an adult disability SW. Has ASD but no 'meltdowns' either. Was bullied all through secondary called 'retard' etc but never involved in fighting. No incidents with other students or staff ever. In fact he always said as having great manners and politeness all though secondary school.

and from mumsnet - there would seem to be many much younger than a 20 year old in much more dire straits that are reviving no help. Hence my question

Thatsnotmycar · 23/10/2022 11:20

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:16

But tell me where the op details anything that would indicate a serious disability? Instead she details the opposite!

OP’s DS has an EHCP, meets the threshold for supported living, a social worker and psychiatrist. And even the LA acknowledge a mainstream setting can’t meet his needs. All of that indicates the severity of his needs.

LaGioconda · 23/10/2022 11:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

And yet he has an EHCP and 20 specialist schools have said they can't meet his needs. That rather suggests he does have serious SEN and disability.

MrsMAgain · 23/10/2022 11:21

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

And your experience and professional qualifications are what, exactly?

TeaPleaseNoLemon · 23/10/2022 11:21

This reply has been deleted

Previously banned poster - This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Punxsutawney · 23/10/2022 11:22

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I can't believe you actually typed this and then pressed post...

RedHelenB · 23/10/2022 11:23

EmmaGrundyForPM · 23/10/2022 10:00

I can't understand why the cost is so high. The OP says her son isn't violent, is polite and well behaved, was in mainstream school and didn't have an ECHP until he was 15. And yet 20 colleges have turned him down saying his needs are too high.

It doesn't make sense to me

This.

Blablablaaaaa · 23/10/2022 11:24

Lizthelettuce · 23/10/2022 10:22

Well yes, they have to don’t they.

Say there is a budget of £100 and 10 pupils with SEND. There is local provision for £10 a head because that’s what the budget allows.

But then a private company pops up with superior provision for £30 a head.

Parents are going to fight for that aren't they. And yes, they can demonstrate 95% of the time that the provision is, indeed, superior. So they win the tribunal, the local authority have to pay the extra to the private company, and now the local provision is funded to the tune of £7 per head.

Then the next parent comes along, see that child A got the private provision, sees that it is superior to the local offer, and understandably fight the battle for their child and win as well.

Local provision now funded £4 a head.

The next child’s parents can’t afford a lawyer to take the LA to tribunal, so they get the £4 provision - tough shit. The LA HAVE to fight the next tribunal for THIS child. Tribunals only focus on the needs of the child under discussion. LAs have to meet the needs of ALL the children in their schools, and they know that a budget of £1 a head cannot possibly meet the needs of the rest of the children they cater for.

I don’t blame the parents. Everyone wants the best for their children. But if you want / need PUBLIC SERVICES to pay for your child’s education then you need to vote / campaign / protest for a government at local AND national levels who will PRIORITISE public services.

The real problem is that the Tory’s have been underfunding social care for the last 12 years. The U.K. social care budget has got ridiculously tight while CQC regulations have increased ten fold, staff pay rock bottom, staff retention rock bottom also .. all while the LAs try to do over the most vulnerable in our society by not meeting legal EHCP plans. It’s the government who need to rethink social care funding and social care structure.

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:26

RedHelenB · 23/10/2022 11:23

This.

Me neither

but we will be accused of all sorts

Unseelie · 23/10/2022 11:26

Justrealised · 23/10/2022 02:31

For those questioning the cost. Children and young people with an ehcp can stay I education until 25 years old (26 depending on the course dates). They have to have their needs met this is a legal requirement. If ultimately it costs 250k that is what the LA have to fund.

Many children/ YP with send
have specialist placements without residential that cost upwards of £100k from primary age.

That’s really shocking. Age 25?!! It doesn’t make any sense.

BringBackCoffeeCreams · 23/10/2022 11:28

Endlesslysurprised84 · 23/10/2022 11:16

But tell me where the op details anything that would indicate a serious disability? Instead she details the opposite!

You tell me when a disability isn't serious.

LaGioconda · 23/10/2022 11:29

Unseelie · 23/10/2022 11:26

That’s really shocking. Age 25?!! It doesn’t make any sense.

Why doesn't it make sense? Why should people with disabilities and SEN not receive the support they need?

Augend23 · 23/10/2022 11:30

Morph22010 · 23/10/2022 10:38

Everyone is not entitled to a personal budget for social care, they are entitled to assessment. My son has an ehcp and is in socialist school but we don’t qualify for any social care

Apologies, that was badly worded. I meant,.if a person is entitled to social care (which given the person in question is receiving support in supported housing, they presumably are) that I believe they are permitted to have that social care provided under a personal budget.

DrEmilleShofhousen · 23/10/2022 11:30

£250k per year…wtaf

Badbadbunny · 23/10/2022 11:30

PimmsOfCourse · 23/10/2022 01:31

I have no idea how they came to that figure of £250k. That would be the full time salaries of quite a few people. I would love a breakdown.
YANBU.

Salaries aren't the only cost though, are they? What about the building, utilities, rent, security, building maintenance, catering, cleaning, etc etc.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is closed and is no longer accepting replies. Click here to start a new thread.

Swipe left for the next trending thread