Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

No first aiders at train station

129 replies

Mushroomlady · 16/10/2022 18:58

An older woman tripped and fell in front of me on the station platform while running for a train today. She was very badly injured. I've been first aid trained for work so was able to help - removed her broken glasses, laid her down on her side, stemmed the bleeding (quite heavy), bandaged her up, shaded her from the sun, talked to her, etc. I asked if any of the station staff were first aiders and the answer was no! There was about 4 of them. I had to shout at them to call an ambulance, but it was another passenger that called as the staff were dithering and seemed quite clueless.

Aibu to be absolutely shocked about this? They are dealing with hundreds of passengers per day. How is it not essential that they have a certified first aider on site at all times?
Should I complain? Assume they would need to log it in accident book?

OP posts:
Richelieu · 16/10/2022 21:38

I think you’re getting a ridiculously hard time on here @Mushroomlady. You did a good thing and I’d share your dismay at the very poor response of the station staff.

Divebar2021 · 16/10/2022 21:41

I’m not disagreeing with you OP but I find the general population tends to think first aid is not something that they should have any involvement yet look to other people to provide when they need it. Individuals can invest in the safety of their own families by getting trained but mostly don’t. I know some people invest in paediatric first aid training which is obviously great but it doesn’t have to be limited to that. People either think that nothing bad will happen or that someone like yourself will step up and deal with it.

XenoBitch · 16/10/2022 21:44

Divebar2021 · 16/10/2022 21:41

I’m not disagreeing with you OP but I find the general population tends to think first aid is not something that they should have any involvement yet look to other people to provide when they need it. Individuals can invest in the safety of their own families by getting trained but mostly don’t. I know some people invest in paediatric first aid training which is obviously great but it doesn’t have to be limited to that. People either think that nothing bad will happen or that someone like yourself will step up and deal with it.

It is not just first aid knowledge though. It is being able to handle a crisis situation, and keep a level head.
Like I said in a PP, I have the knowledge, but not the confidence.

Clevs · 16/10/2022 21:47

Poshjock · 16/10/2022 21:10

I'll just pop this here for folk who want to look at the underpinning legislation. www.hse.gov.uk/firstaid/legislation.htm

Ultimately the Risk Assessment is the legal requirement and this should provide due diligence - which is basically a defence against allegations of negligence by failure to provide FA cover - and bear in mind the absolute limitations of such a provision. Large scale public events will have an H&S plan and associated RA which will indentify needs and level of cover required. And there there are other legislations such as the Sports Ground Safety Regs which put a further burden on locations and providers to comply with the law. It is a complex area at times and often H&S advisers are required to keep providers right.

Mad as it is, I worked in a Ambulance HQ and there was a requirement to have a First Aider on premises during working hours (M-F 9-5) because of the civilian staff who worked in the admin office, managers, vehicle mechanics and cleaners etc. Even though there was a fully functioning Station on site with multiple Paramedics - the reality was the qualified staff were not permanently on site therefore FA provision needed to be there when the staff numbers were above 25. A point proven when a vehicle fell off ramp onto a mechanic when there were no ambulances on site!

I work on an ambulance station and we too have a first aid box and accident book even though the garage is full of fully stocked ambulances.

Like you say, there's no guarantee that any clinical staff will be available if a member of admin needs medical attention so they have to have a first aid kit and nominated first aider.

sweeneytoddsrazor · 16/10/2022 21:56

I don't think anyone is suggesting its great not having first aiders, but just pointing out its not a legal requirement to provide them for the general public.

Most first aiders I know would always help and indeed most companies expect their first aiders to help.

thelobsterquadrille · 16/10/2022 22:02

Richelieu · 16/10/2022 21:38

I think you’re getting a ridiculously hard time on here @Mushroomlady. You did a good thing and I’d share your dismay at the very poor response of the station staff.

Nobody's saying she didn't do a good thing but I think people have unrealistic expectations when it comes to things like this.

Most small businesses won't have anyone on site who is first aid trained as it's not legally required and sending someone off on a course costs money 🤷🏻‍♀️ they also would need to train multiple people to ensure all days and holidays are covered. You'd then have to pay them all to do the training plus any associated travel costs which is yet another expense.

Ultimately most businesses are going to invest money in something that isn't legally required. You could argue we have a moral obligation to help people (which I agree we do have) but ultimately unless the law changes, businesses won't change.

I know basic first aid but like others here, I wouldn't be confident enough to help as I'd be far too worried about making things worse.

Whycantibetangy · 16/10/2022 22:18

Mushroomlady · 16/10/2022 19:43

To be clear, it is a mainline train station with hundreds of trains passing through every day. Trains arriving every 5-10 mins. At any one time it seems like there are at least 5 staff visibly on duty.

The staff you saw may have safety critical roles to fulfil to ensure the safe arrival/departure of said trains and not able to stand down to help a passenger.

The strike action currently underway is because they are trying to reduce staff numbers even further.

Whilst its sad that we don’t have spare staff milling around to step in, as a publicly funded rail network who would pay for these?

GarlicCrackers · 17/10/2022 09:13

I've asked what train station it was.

I working operations for one of the largest railway companies in the UK

I have access to every single piece of information the companies holds.

  1. I could tell you what our obligations are around first aiders

  2. I could tell you the percentage of staff trained as first aiders

But if you don't tell me which station, I can't give you the information you're all hypothesising on

GarlicCrackers · 17/10/2022 09:13

Ooh you can tell I'm tired "I working"

balalake · 17/10/2022 09:15

The majority of rail stations are unstaffed and have been for many years.

BIGmommalizzie · 17/10/2022 09:16

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

ThrowingSomeCrumbs · 17/10/2022 09:23

If you are someone speaking out against the train strikes, then YABVVVU. Station & train safety is one of the reasons they are striking.

Seeline · 17/10/2022 09:31

I suspect that for most places the first aider us there for company employees, and is insured as such.
They will not be covered for incidents with the public. If the individual for example put someone in the recovery position when they have a spinal injury, and caused long-term damage, they are leaving themselves open to being sued.
Unfortunately, this is the way this country is heading.

ChocFrog · 17/10/2022 10:38

My local station is only manned at peak times. In the middle of weekdays, or on Sundays, there’s no staff there at all. Just an open gate and you hop on train and buy ticket from conductor.

I think you’re misunderstanding how the railways run. Yes someone could fall and need help but that is also the case on any pavement. The railways don’t accept any responsibility for visitors (aren’t there usually lots of signs there saying exactly that?)

EBearhug · 17/10/2022 12:10

I'd have thought that one of the main roles of station staff is to keep trains arriving and leaving on time, in as safe a manner as possible. I would have assumed this should cover what to do if a passenger has a trip or fall (I have to do trips, slips and falls training, and I spend most of my life at home, and in the office about once a week these days.)

I can understand that there's no requirement for a trained first aider, but I am surprised they seem not to know how to deal with passengers who create a hazard (as a body on the ground is,) and potentially impede the efficient loading and unloading of passengers from trains. There are a lot of things which could potentially cause problems at a train station.

I am a first aider at work - I've been doing first aid courses every few years since I was a teenager. If someone collapsed in front of me, I'd hate to have no idea of what to do at all. Much of the training is make sure they're breathing and not bleeding and call an ambulance, though in reality, it's mostly been paper cuts. (For which I am grateful.)

SBAM · 17/10/2022 12:24

I used to work for a department store, writing the duty first aid roster. It was so difficult, because being first aid trained is something you volunteer for, and after a few pretty intense incidents people weren’t keen to do it. The company paid the training fee (around £100 for the one day course) and the staff member got about £5 a week extra pay.
If the duty first aider didn’t come in then the duty manager was responsible for any incidents, but that’s basically just calling an ambulance in an emergency.

HeckyPeck · 17/10/2022 12:44

YANBU to expect the staff to have responded and tried to help the person. I would complain about that.

I'm not first aid trained but if someone using the service I work for had an accident I wouldn't just stand around and do nothing!

ArcaneWireless · 17/10/2022 13:17

I wouldn’t crowd round someone who was already being attended to either. That can cause more distress to the injured party.

As garlic said, it would be interesting to know which station it was and if they really did nothing.

That could be checked fairly easily.

Or even highlighted on social media so that the station manager could answer as to actions taken and duties of those on the concourse.

And who arranged the announcement on the train? Someone arranged that. That isn’t doing nothing.

Unusual for a call to be made on a train that is due to depart. Not impossible but unusual.

There is only one observation here. It would be interesting to hear both sides.

mycatisannoying · 17/10/2022 13:52

TescoCustomerService · 16/10/2022 19:18

Firstly the elderly woman should have been more careful, secondly the staff have absolutely no requirement to provide first aid to passengers.

You are all heart.

TakeYourFinalPosition · 17/10/2022 14:02

it isn’t ruinously expensive to put your staff through basic first aid training is it? I’m not saying anything fancy but basics would help.

No, it's not, but you have to have staff willing to do it - and usually train outside of work hours. And then when you do the training, they advise you that if you use it on members of the public and cause harm, you could be sued. Or at least, I'm heavily discouraged from using my pediatric first aid qualification every time I update it.

I believe the convention at train stations is to use the tannoy to call for medical support; although there will obviously be times that there isn't any. And I suppose if the NHS was fit for purpose, and the fall was bad enough, they'd be able to attend swiftly. If you were hit by a train or electrocuted, you'd need an ambulance at the bare minimum anyway (presuming survival). A first aid course wouldn't be in the least useful.

Thanks for stopping to help. I hope you're not too shaken.

HellloooooWorld · 17/10/2022 14:02

Peashoots · 16/10/2022 19:02

YABU. No offence but while you were very kind and I’m sure comforted her, the things you did are just common sense and don’t require any “training”. I’m sure had you not been there, the railway staff would have similarly helped her.

What a nonsense!

HellloooooWorld · 17/10/2022 14:04

Creasedlinen · 16/10/2022 19:14

PP is right. First aiders only require for staff. If they don't have many staff at each location, they're not required.

The fall could just have easily been in the street and she''d have been just as reliant on a passerby. These things happen.

Streets are public places, translations are privately owned (I presume?).

YANBU op, it's rubbish. And 4 staff? Funny that M&S and Sainsbury's have dozens and dozens of staff in their stores yet 'public' transport (well it is private transport I guess, are just taking the piss.

HellloooooWorld · 17/10/2022 14:05

translations = train stations

HellloooooWorld · 17/10/2022 14:06

Augend23 · 16/10/2022 19:40

This.

Also I don't care how someone injures themselves, I'm not just going to leave them on the floor in who knows what state.

I agree with @Tickledtrout and am completely surprised that so many have voted that YABU. I suppose that's Neo liberalism for you 😂

SirenSays · 17/10/2022 14:16

The stand around and stare is really common. I helped a woman who tripped and cut her head and spilt her hot coffee all over herself and the majority of people just looked at us.
When I helped a heavily pregnant homeless woman I couldn't even persuade a passerby to call an ambulance for her.