My DS goes to an independent primary school (all boys). He’s in Y 4. Rugby is a big thing at the school. My DS’s year is small 26 kids in 2 classes. They are split into three teams A, B and C based on ability. There are 8 kids in Team C. Ds is one of them. I’ve no issue with that.
Today on WhatsApp/Instagram are pictures of a rugby tournament run by the school (7 a side). They’ve invited other schools. Only Teams A and B were invited. So 8 children out of the year were not.
I just don’t think this is on. Given it was a weekend I imagine some children would not have been able to come, surely they could have rejigged the teams with a few subs on each team and everyone could have been invited? I just think they are 8/9 and to leave less then a 1/3 of the year out is mean. Fair enough if the year was bigger, but surely when you get to the point less then 1/2 kids won’t be invited you look to try and include everyone?
There’s plenty of time for the less sporty kids not to be selected why do it so early? My son is not as good as the most able kids, but it’s not the stage where it’s obvious. .
My DH however thinks it’s fine (he was good at rugby). You can’t be expected to be selected for everything. His view is if the kids aren’t good enough then they will be demoralised playing against more able kids.
So:
YABU - school should not have left out the C Team/should have rejigged to include everyone.
YANBU - it was fine. You can’t expect kids to be selected for everything/would be unfair to make C team players be subs for B team.