Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be completely confused by the mini budget?

288 replies

towelhammer · 23/09/2022 09:57

Just baffled really, how is it going to boost the economy & improve public services?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
FatOaf · 23/09/2022 13:14

He more or less said "fuck redistribution. Only growth and benefiting the rich is important".

It is a strongly redistributive budget: redistributing from the poorest to the richest. It was very obvious that was the intention when Truss & Kwarteng started shouting about the evils of redistribution.

ilovesooty · 23/09/2022 13:17

edwinbear · 23/09/2022 11:05

Those of you so furious about this, will you be volunteering to continue paying 20% lower rate? E mail address is right here for you.
[email protected]

Please feel free to carry on paying 20% if you think it's the right thing to do.

I suspect you're a higher rate taxpayer.

Novum · 23/09/2022 13:17

I'm seriously worried about the cost of all this that we will inevitably have to pick up down the line. I guess Kwarteng and Truss reckon it won't be their problem as they won't be in power.

FatOaf · 23/09/2022 13:19

It's crazy how quickly levelling up as a philosophy was dumped.

There has never been a levelling up philosophy. "Levelling up" was a slogan, not a policy. They are still using the slogan as the name of a ministry whose remit is the exacty opposite.

To be completely confused by the mini budget?
FatOaf · 23/09/2022 13:20

I guess Kwarteng and Truss reckon it won't be their problem as they won't be in power.

When their political careers end (in 2024), they will be on the boards of companies that benefit from these measures.

Goldpaw · 23/09/2022 13:20

Never understood the logic behind cutting taxes to fix all our problems.

Public services are on their knees as it is, this isn't going to help.

SleeplessInEngland · 23/09/2022 13:21

There has never been a levelling up philosophy

Obviously it was never carried out, but they at least pretended to care about it. They're not even doing that anymore.

WhatdoImean · 23/09/2022 13:23

OK - Resolution Foundation figures show that over 50% of funds from this budget will be going to the top 5% in terms of wage earners.

OVER 50% to 1 in 20 people

How can we as a society accept this?

LadyFromage · 23/09/2022 13:26

WhatdoImean · 23/09/2022 13:23

OK - Resolution Foundation figures show that over 50% of funds from this budget will be going to the top 5% in terms of wage earners.

OVER 50% to 1 in 20 people

How can we as a society accept this?

For clarity (and just to help people imagine this): that's anyone earning about £80k or more.

sonsmum · 23/09/2022 13:26

Those on higher incomes pay an enormous amount of tax in the first instance (don't forget that!) Also those on higher incomes are not all 'rich'. People tend to spend what they earn!! This plan is to stimulate growth. Without growth, there may have to be cuts, which would hit more harder.

Dave20 · 23/09/2022 13:32

Levelling up is dead and gone. Covid and the cost of living ended that.Another

Boris promise that was never going to be fulfilled.

sicklycolleague · 23/09/2022 13:32

sonsmum · 23/09/2022 13:26

Those on higher incomes pay an enormous amount of tax in the first instance (don't forget that!) Also those on higher incomes are not all 'rich'. People tend to spend what they earn!! This plan is to stimulate growth. Without growth, there may have to be cuts, which would hit more harder.

Exactly this.

uncomfortablydumb53 · 23/09/2022 13:37

It's ridiculous Cutting the taxes of the rich so they continue to get richer
No help for the lower income? Or disabled)
Last year PIP claimants were entitled to claim the warm home discount( £140)
This year we are not entitled(£150! but they have bunged us a sweetener of £150, so they appear to be considering Disabled people needsHmm

venus7 · 23/09/2022 13:39

caringcarer · 23/09/2022 11:17

I think as top Rate income tax now down to 40 percent will attract new businesses to UK so new jobs. Paying 40 percent is still a lot of a wage to lose. It will encourage those who only work 4 days a week to avoid paying the 45 percent to go back to working 5 days a week. Scrapping bankers bonus caps will attract new banks and the best talent in banking into UK. All tax going down from 20 p in £ to 19 p in £ from April will help all those who pay tax. Also reversing NIC contributions by 1.25 percent will help all and also in employers. Cuts on corporation tax will attract new businesses to relocate in UK. Now we will just have to watch and wait if any new large businesses do in relocate to UK. If they do the amount of revenue they generate will offset some of these costs. This seems to favour higher earners and businesses but earlier in year money off council bands A-D helped those with cheaper properties. Those on UC, and with disabilities also got cash help. As a country the UK gets most of its tax from its higher earners and compared to other countries 40 percent is still high.

'The best talent in banking' caused the 2008 crash; banker's bonuses don't lead to better decisions, they lead to risk taking for personal financial benefit.

ArabellaScott · 23/09/2022 13:41

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 23/09/2022 12:12

The thing is, a lot of people will feel that it benefits them, because on paper, it will - they will pay less tax and NI, and therefore get to keep more of the money that they earn. What they may not fully appreciate is that there will be much less funding for public services, and the massive impact that that will have on our society as a whole.

I think the Tories bank on people not seeing those connections in order to keep the middle classes sweet while they're busy making their super rich friends and relations even richer. They don't bother too much about keeping the poor happy, because they are less likely to vote Tory anyway.

Yep. No extra spend on the NHS, which is desperately, dangerously in need of it.

More benefit cuts.

Manekinek0 · 23/09/2022 13:42

The logic is cutting taxes gives people more money to spend thus boosts the economy.

For many once you earn over a certain amount you stop spending all your money. We will have a little more left each month and that will just get invested with the rest.

ArabellaScott · 23/09/2022 13:42

A windfall tax on the energy companies, plus uncoupling energy prices from wholesale gas prces, would have been a quick, effective and popular way to raise money.

ArabellaScott · 23/09/2022 13:43

WhatdoImean · 23/09/2022 13:23

OK - Resolution Foundation figures show that over 50% of funds from this budget will be going to the top 5% in terms of wage earners.

OVER 50% to 1 in 20 people

How can we as a society accept this?

What's the alternative, though? We don't have a functioning opposition.

Meili04 · 23/09/2022 13:43

Our household are higher income tax payers we can't understand how this is going to stimulate growth. The health service, schools are on their knees. The economy is fucked , slightly cutting stamp duty will do nothing rates are predicted to rise even further. Someone has to tell the truth and admit it's going to be painful. They cant because it's short term policies , they are going to lose the next election so are pushing through things that benefits themselves.

ArabellaScott · 23/09/2022 13:46

'New legislation to cut planning rules, get rid of EU regulations and environmental assessments in an effort to speed up building'

Oh, fuck.

Whammyyammy · 23/09/2022 13:47

Manekinek0 · 23/09/2022 13:42

The logic is cutting taxes gives people more money to spend thus boosts the economy.

For many once you earn over a certain amount you stop spending all your money. We will have a little more left each month and that will just get invested with the rest.

And where does it get invested? As putting it in a bank doesn't earn much %.

Investments can be in the forn of small or large businesses, thus generating employment (with PAYE), into property, thus providing rental properties for people to live in.

rainingsnoring · 23/09/2022 13:53

towelhammer · 23/09/2022 09:57

Just baffled really, how is it going to boost the economy & improve public services?

It isn't. They just don't give a s**t. The main aim is to make their rich banker/ corporate lawyer friends even richer.
Except they will probably become poorer too as the markets clearly don't it (no surprise there). The pound is falling further.
The Tories are an absolute disgrace.

rainingsnoring · 23/09/2022 13:56

ilovesooty · 23/09/2022 13:17

I suspect you're a higher rate taxpayer.

That is entirely irrelevant @edwinbear. Absolutely nothing to do with lower rate payers paying more.

If you are involved in the financial sector you should be aware that this budget is ridiculously risky for the whole UK economy.

the80sweregreat · 23/09/2022 14:00

Buying Property is all very well if your the one benefitting from it. The ones living in these places will be paying sky high rents no doubt

WhatdoImean · 23/09/2022 14:00

If you actually wanted to help lower paid people effectively through taxes, the obvious way to do so would be to lift the tax threshold significantly. Yes, everyone would get the same benefit, but the proportional effect on the poor would be dramatic, whilst on the rich, comparatively much less

The other way (that would help the economy) would be to allow people to earn more before losing benefits - thus they would be incentivised to go to work (if possible; this is simply not an option for some)

Simply giving more money to those who already have a lot? This is called "Trickle down economics" and was tried in the 80s in the US with Regan - and has been shown NOT TO WORK. All that happens is that the rich get richer, and do not spend more.

Swipe left for the next trending thread