Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be completely confused by the mini budget?

288 replies

towelhammer · 23/09/2022 09:57

Just baffled really, how is it going to boost the economy & improve public services?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Blossomtoes · 23/09/2022 10:58

smooththecat · 23/09/2022 10:09

Well, seeing as we are a low wage economy and with inflation and interest rates as they are, the money just isn’t there to spend.

So they cut taxes on the wealthiest so there’s even less money? Where’s the logic in that?

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 23/09/2022 10:58

RewildingAmbridge · 23/09/2022 10:49

Some of it I get, reduction of 1% on income tax payers a bit more money in everyone's pockets to pay for the increased costs of utilities, food, public transport, petrol etc, I don't get the banker bonus cap removal, stamp duty threshold raise which will increase house prices (look what happened before), or completely getting rid of higher rate tax, push the threshold up a bit maybe as it hasn't moved for years and is starting to capture people who are not particularly high earners.

But it isn't in ^everyone's" pockets, is it?

The poorest people won't benefit from an income tax cut. Are benefits being increased to help them pay for the increased cost of living? I thought not.

JP3264 · 23/09/2022 11:00

Another thing that makes no sense is scrapping the 45% tax rate but keeping the loss of personal allowance between 100k and 125k.

Someone earning between 100k and 125k effectively pays 60% tax on that £25k. A much higher rate of tax than for those earning many times more.

towelhammer · 23/09/2022 11:01

I also think it’s designed to put Labour on the back foot for the next election, because they’ll have to commit to some kind of tax increases and the Tories will play on that in their campaign.

good point

OP posts:
RewildingAmbridge · 23/09/2022 11:01

@MrsBennetsPoorNerves those on benefits should get an increase yes, for working people this will put a little more back in your pocket, also most people on benefits actually are in some form of employment so will also benefit from income tax cut

Topgub · 23/09/2022 11:01

@RafaistheKingofClay

The people who voted tory definitely voted tory

DesdemonaThreethree · 23/09/2022 11:02

drunkinthebackofthecar · 23/09/2022 10:56

DH and I say this all the time - imagine if we had kids drawing pictures and people clapping for the Passport Office, HMRC or the DVLA. The way we treat the NHS in this country is like a quasi-religion. It’s strange and is making us sicker.

I'm now laughing at the idea of clapping for HMRC. I'll be first in the queue. 😬👏

Skyellaskerry · 23/09/2022 11:03

@RewildingAmbridge the 1% tax cut does not apply to everyone as many people are paid too little to pay tax at all. This cut will not help this group at all.

edwinbear · 23/09/2022 11:05

Those of you so furious about this, will you be volunteering to continue paying 20% lower rate? E mail address is right here for you.
[email protected]

Please feel free to carry on paying 20% if you think it's the right thing to do.

MintJulia · 23/09/2022 11:05

I think the theory is that getting rid of the top rate of tax will encourage high net worth individuals to return to live in the UK, and spend and pay tax here.

Also that those who do have money will spend it in the economy, trickling down through businesses. I'm not convinced.

And it still means single parents earning between 50 & 60k have a marginal tax rate of 60% even after today's measures. Patently unfair and high time the govt did something to even it up.

walkingonsunshinekat · 23/09/2022 11:06

Everanewbie · 23/09/2022 10:58

Some of the measures are a difficult sell politically. At a time where a lot of us are struggling, reducing the top rate of tax for people that earn above £150,000 doesn't sound great. But the reality is that higher tax at the top end doesn't generate any more income as it pushes talent abroad and encourages creative accounting. The 45% tax rate was always more about appearing to hammer the wealthy than actually generating revenue. And what business is it of government to tell a private organisation what it can or cannot pay its employee? Removing the cap is righting a wrong stemming from politics of envy.

What I am disappointed about is that there has been no effort to increase the higher rate threshold. It was never intended to catch people earning £50k. Also, I'm disappointed that no effort has been made to reduce the burden of the annual allowance and lifetime allowance charges on pensions which are forcing skilled professionals, especially doctors, to retire early to avoid huge upfront taxation, at a time when they are most needed.

If you earn so much you can afford tax accountants to reduce your tax liability from 45% you'll do exactly the same for a 40% rate, many people on very large incomes are not PAYE.

Agree, the TH for the 40% rate is too low, should be around 65k.

Yes should have done more on pensions etc.

BUT your missing the point of this budget, its about making the rich richer and nothing to do with fairness or righting wrongs, they know they are on the way out and are acting accordingly.

kegofcoffee · 23/09/2022 11:07

RewildingAmbridge · 23/09/2022 10:51

Properly funding preschool childcare would surely be a boost for the economy, look how many on here say they can't afford to work because of nursery costs, also nurseries would also need to employ more staff

It's very well proven that widely available, cheap childcare works wonders for the economy.

In Canada they get 4-9 times the return on the investment.

Yet the government just seems to acknowledge this.

LemonTT · 23/09/2022 11:08

Stimulating productivity is a good objective. But the approach and timing are just messed up and incoherent. With known bad consequences for disadvantaged parts of the country and poorer communities.

The worst aspect of all this is that she has pivoted away from levelling up communities that fell behind as a direct consequence of these Thatcherite policies in the 1980’s. She is stimulating the finance and banking sectors which favour London and the south east. The part of the country with the broadest shoulders and highest incomes.

kegofcoffee · 23/09/2022 11:08

FetlocksBlowingInTheWind · 23/09/2022 10:53

I'm weirdly jealous of higher earners now...aren't they effectively 21% better off after this tax cut?

No; it's a cut from 45% to 40% for earnings over £150k. Rather than a cut from 40% to 20%, that jump remains the same.

sst1234 · 23/09/2022 11:09

This mini budget is a response to spot the rot caused by 25 years of mismanagement of the economy. Here are the lowlights of that mismanagement -

Tax credits introduced by labour government to subsidize low pay and keep wages at the bottom suppressed. Which keeps wages all the way up the pay scale suppressed. It also causes low productivity. Why would employers invest in raising productivity when they can get cheap labour subsidized by the taxpayer.

Refusal by labour and successive Tory governments to invest in any major infrastructure projects. For instance the third runway at Heathrow.

Refusal by successive government to invest in home grown energy, nuclear and gas.

Printing more money to pay for Covid lockdowns than had been printed between 2008 and 2020.

The low wages and low productivity in this are grinding down the economy. And the disastrous lockdowns just brought things to breaking point. All the measures announced today will be a sticking plaster.

The real work would require even more unpopular choices. Green lighting double digits nuclear power plants, Raising minimum wage to at least £15, raising personal allowance to £15k, reducing, corporation tax to 12%, restructuring the NHS, further tax breaks for privately funded infrastructure projects above a certain amount, approve 3rd runway at Heathrow. This would be painful in the short term, but money doesn’t grow on trees, even it is the proverbial magic one. You either print it (we all know how that went), borrow it, or make and sell stuff at better margins than your competitors.

kegofcoffee · 23/09/2022 11:09

towelhammer · 23/09/2022 10:58

Our kids will pay for it, and probably their kids too.

There's not enough kids though, we already have an huge demographic shift. Immigration isn't so popular either 😆

This is so true. And another reason why investing in childcare would have been a more sensible idea.

walkingonsunshinekat · 23/09/2022 11:09

MintJulia · 23/09/2022 11:05

I think the theory is that getting rid of the top rate of tax will encourage high net worth individuals to return to live in the UK, and spend and pay tax here.

Also that those who do have money will spend it in the economy, trickling down through businesses. I'm not convinced.

And it still means single parents earning between 50 & 60k have a marginal tax rate of 60% even after today's measures. Patently unfair and high time the govt did something to even it up.

Why would people who have decided to leave the UK want to return to a country facing economic collapse?
They have a life overseas and tax accountants to ensure a far lower rate than even 40%.

The capital markets, at the moment, have lost faith in the UK being able to pay its debts, 10 yr govt bond yields are through the roof.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 23/09/2022 11:10

RewildingAmbridge · 23/09/2022 11:01

@MrsBennetsPoorNerves those on benefits should get an increase yes, for working people this will put a little more back in your pocket, also most people on benefits actually are in some form of employment so will also benefit from income tax cut

Not if they earn under the threshold for income tax, which many do - especially those employed in the gig economy, on zero hour contracts etc.

When you say that people on benefits "should get an increase", what does that mean exactly? Are you saying that you agree that this should have been in the budget but wasn't? Or are you saying that they will get an increase that I have somehow overlooked?

Zippedydoo123 · 23/09/2022 11:11

It won't help many people as any extra pounds will need to be spent on groceries petrol utilities and many things have now really shot up in price. Clothing shoes everything is costing so much more.

DowningStreetParty · 23/09/2022 11:11

It’s absolutely terrifyingly self-serving of the Tory party and will break what little faith most of us have left in politicians to treat people fairly.

Most adults I know are worried sick about bills and eating and keeping warm enough to get through the winter. While our government just supports its rich mates. It’s disgusting.

Eastangular2000 · 23/09/2022 11:11

Willyoujustbequiet · 23/09/2022 10:27

It's disgusting. Makes me physically sick that they are giving wealthy people more money whilst we literally have children going cold and hungry.

Its morally repugnant . Tories are evil.

Interesting POV that they are giving wealthy people money. Do you come from the standpoint that all money is the property of the state to dish out? Because unless you do I haven’t seen anything today that involves the state giving people money, all it is doing is reducing the amount of money that it takes from some people.

Deutschman · 23/09/2022 11:12

@DesdemonaThreethree and @drunkinthebackofthecar I agree the attitude to the nhs is odd, but there are important benefits:

  1. A shared culture of valuing health and public service. Contributes to social cohesion and a willingness to do things like pay tax
  2. People working in the nhs see it as a valuable public duty and therefore give huge amounts of their time free. They also give a part of themselves to patients in compassion etc - workers in the dvla don’t need to do this.
In many ways being valued socially makes up for a lot of issues with poor pay and conditions, although now both have been eroded so much that staff goodwill is vanishing.
Wanttobeanastronaut · 23/09/2022 11:13

smooththecat · 23/09/2022 10:24

Fundamentally, the Tories don’t believe in improving public services. They’d rather businesses bled them dry for profit and, for example, flood the country with raw sewage.

Absolutely. And it should be remembered that a 'streamlined' public sector is what the British public has been voting for since 2010. People have got what they asked for. Only now has the penny dropped on what austerity really meant.

walkingonsunshinekat · 23/09/2022 11:15

@sst1234 If your correct about the mini budget, the markets would want to put money into the UK, they aren't they are doing the opposite.

WTC introduced by Labour was just a name change for various types on income support, first introduced in 1972 under Heath.

KK has done nothing to increase investment in UK plc, instead its just one of the largest tax cutting budgets ever seen, no requirement to invest and totally un costed.

We are heading for hi inflation and interest rates.

lemonyanus · 23/09/2022 11:16

Perhaps the aspirational prunes who normally vote Tory will now realise they aren't a member of their 'club' if they aren't earning £150,000+ you're just another pleb to be trod on.

Swipe left for the next trending thread