A relatively new mum friend (mumchum) had asked if we could share childcare over the upcoming strikes & nursery closures. I agreed but explained I would be working so it would be my DH (he is striking but not on picket line) who would have to take the kids (3&4). I did ask him first. He told her himself, he was happy to have them as two is often easier than one.
Mumchum then started saying she’d try to find someone else as it wasn’t fair to my husband. This has angered him as he thinks she doesn’t trust him with her child. Our mutual friend messaged me to say mumchum had also refused her husband to care for her kids a day during the strikes (he is also on strike) but it was ok if she would be doing it.
Is mumchum being unreasonable? Why is it ok for me to look after her child but not my dh?
YABU - Mumchum has a valid point. Striking fathers shouldn’t be doing childcare.
YANBU - If the dads are available but the mums are working then she ought to be happy someone is offering to have her kids.