The criteria provided are deliberately very vague, and if you wanted to pathologize them you’d find they can fit with a number of neurodiversities, mental illnesses, and personality disorders. Unsurprisingly, at least in the case of personality disorders, because all are behaviours present in ‘normal’ people, but taken to an extreme.
Taken as they are, however, they’re all normal human emotions that will be present to greater or lesser effect throughout an individual’s life, dependent on a number of factors.
The one about art appreciation - okay, so how has this been observed and measured? Because whilst I’m sure it’s a great appeal to the ego, it seems quite without foundation.
The one about reading people - yes, psychopaths also are skilled at that, and honestly it’s not something that’s difficult for anyone halfway observant. It’s not some exceptional trait of a ‘HSP’
Not liking having to do too many things at once - that is literally everyone.
People roll their eyes because it’s taking normal experience, or even mental illness/disorder, and dressing it up in a superiority complex. It just makes someone look like they consider themselves normal and boring, and are desperate to be ‘special’ in some way at: Before ‘HSP’ it was ‘empath’; and before that it was ‘indigo children’. It’s the same shit with a different label.