My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To be absolutely furious about this and drop DSS off at her house anyway?

934 replies

CottonCandy11 · 15/08/2022 07:04

It's me, DH, our son and my DSS who is 9. He's a lovely kid this is nothing to do with him personally but his mother.

He was due to go back to his mum's last night after being with us the previous 3 nights. She rang in the day and asked if he could stay another night as she had been invited out to something.

My husband asked me as he had to start work very early this morning (travelling down south so had to set off at 4am).

I said yes on the very strict proviso she comes to get him at 8am as I have a day out planned.

My son is 4 and I've planned a mother / son day out. Booked tickets for something and am really looking forward to just spending some fun downtime with him on our own. He's been poorly recently too and just got better last week so it's a nice treat for him (and me!).

Anyway, DH has just rang me saying she's messaged him saying sorry she won't be here for 8 as she ended up staying out so won't be home yet until about 11.

I'm so angry. I know her partner is at home (they have a baby so he's been in with their DC) and I know DSS has a key if he's still asleep. I'm seriously minded to go and drop him off with her partner. She'll be furious but I literally couldn't give a shit about what she thinks now, she cares about no one else whatsoever. It's always been the same, hers are the only plans that matter.

But I'm not missing my day with my son, I've been looking forward to it and I'm not having him and me miss out because she wanted to go on a piss up last night and didn't get home.

OP posts:
Report

Am I being unreasonable?

2878 votes. Final results.

POLL
You are being unreasonable
7%
You are NOT being unreasonable
93%
KnockedInn · 18/08/2022 14:03

DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 07:49

I’m sure if the DH had said an outright no then he’d have been accused of not grabbing the chance to spend more time with his son, shame on the OP for being so open about her resentment of DSS/his mother that DH didn’t dare ask her for the favour, blah blah.

On here there is literally zero way to handle any scenario involving DSCs that won’t end up with at least a proportion of people posting nonconstructive guff like “my heat breaks for those poor kids”.

Personal prejudice doesn’t let individual family dynamics or actual facts get in the way of a chance to project their own unrelated issues onto an OP.

I’m sure if the DH had said an outright no then the OP would have had no reason to post a problem.

Report
MachineBee · 18/08/2022 14:07

Endlesslypatient82 · 17/08/2022 16:38

a 9 year old coming home to an empty house? I have a 9 year old. Even if I thought she was the most sensible person on the planet, I wouldn’t want her to come home to an empty house! Do you have children?

Yes I do. And they had keys at the same age - just in case. Rarely needed, but far better they let themselves in than be stuck outside in all weathers.

Report
DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 16:07

KnockedInn · 18/08/2022 14:03

I’m sure if the DH had said an outright no then the OP would have had no reason to post a problem.

No, but if OP had gone on to use that scenario on another thread as an example of an NRP asserting their boundaries she’d have been subjected to all the usual criticisms I outlined above. My point was that according to some on here anything a step mum does can be twisted into a negative.

Report
Endlesslypatient82 · 18/08/2022 17:32

DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 16:07

No, but if OP had gone on to use that scenario on another thread as an example of an NRP asserting their boundaries she’d have been subjected to all the usual criticisms I outlined above. My point was that according to some on here anything a step mum does can be twisted into a negative.

But she would not needed to have “asserted her boundaries”

in this scenario her DH saw it off before it even reached her

Report
DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 19:15

Endlesslypatient82 · 18/08/2022 17:32

But she would not needed to have “asserted her boundaries”

in this scenario her DH saw it off before it even reached her

I specifically said an NRP asserting their boundaries, not a SP.

Report
KnockedInn · 18/08/2022 21:08

DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 16:07

No, but if OP had gone on to use that scenario on another thread as an example of an NRP asserting their boundaries she’d have been subjected to all the usual criticisms I outlined above. My point was that according to some on here anything a step mum does can be twisted into a negative.

I'm aware. But in the case of his ex's character, he knows full well her word is crap. He would have been handling it had he told her NO and never bothered his wife with the request in the first place. By taking that chance of something going wrong, and then leaving, he left the potential mess, his ex would make, to be cleaned up by his wife.

OP would not have gone on to use that scenario on another thread BECAUSE her DH never bothered her with it, so she didn't even know.

Even when you make up what ifs, you're still wrong. It's a head scratcher why you keep going on and on about it.

When DH says NO to ex + He doesn't bother wife with request = Happy household & no threads on mumsnet

Report
KnockedInn · 18/08/2022 21:10

Endlesslypatient82 · 18/08/2022 17:32

But she would not needed to have “asserted her boundaries”

in this scenario her DH saw it off before it even reached her

You are absolutely correct 💯

Report
DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 22:09

KnockedInn · 18/08/2022 21:08

I'm aware. But in the case of his ex's character, he knows full well her word is crap. He would have been handling it had he told her NO and never bothered his wife with the request in the first place. By taking that chance of something going wrong, and then leaving, he left the potential mess, his ex would make, to be cleaned up by his wife.

OP would not have gone on to use that scenario on another thread BECAUSE her DH never bothered her with it, so she didn't even know.

Even when you make up what ifs, you're still wrong. It's a head scratcher why you keep going on and on about it.

When DH says NO to ex + He doesn't bother wife with request = Happy household & no threads on mumsnet

How am I going on about anything? I'm just responding to comments on a thread aka a conversation. I'm a step mum with years of lived experience and find it amusing that I'm being pulled up on making up a "what if" when the constant theme used to criticise step mums across this board by people with zero experience of being a step parent themselves is "what if" this was your own child?"

As for "When DH says NO to ex + He doesn't bother wife with request = Happy household & no threads on mumsnet" the OP was clearly happy to volunteer to have her "lovely" stepson for some extra time as long as it didn't impact her pre-booked plans the next day. If I was in her position I'd have been mightily pissed off if my DH had presumed to speak on my behalf unless I'd expressly told him I didn't want to know. Now OP's made her wishes clear, he's at liberty to shut the ex's requests down without any further communication with OP.

Report
KnockedInn · 19/08/2022 03:07

DebussytoaDiscoBeat · 18/08/2022 22:09

How am I going on about anything? I'm just responding to comments on a thread aka a conversation. I'm a step mum with years of lived experience and find it amusing that I'm being pulled up on making up a "what if" when the constant theme used to criticise step mums across this board by people with zero experience of being a step parent themselves is "what if" this was your own child?"

As for "When DH says NO to ex + He doesn't bother wife with request = Happy household & no threads on mumsnet" the OP was clearly happy to volunteer to have her "lovely" stepson for some extra time as long as it didn't impact her pre-booked plans the next day. If I was in her position I'd have been mightily pissed off if my DH had presumed to speak on my behalf unless I'd expressly told him I didn't want to know. Now OP's made her wishes clear, he's at liberty to shut the ex's requests down without any further communication with OP.

OMG you seriously have comprehension problems. You can't be mightily pissed off over something you know nothing about!

Report
AgentJohnson · 19/08/2022 04:55

Your issue isn’t with this poor boy, it’s with his parents. Now you know, you won’t make the mistake again.

Report
Endlesslypatient82 · 19/08/2022 06:31

You can't be mightily pissed off over something you know nothing about!

What on earth are you on about?

those people pissed off about “those foreigners taking our jobs”. You think they are pissed off about this because they have a full understanding about the issue?

A lot of people are pissed off about something they know very very little about it!

Report
Yousee · 19/08/2022 06:38

I think PP means if the exchange was between the child's parents without OP ever being told a request was made or denied, then OP would know nothing about it and would have no reason to be pissed off.
Not sure what is so confusing about this point.

Report
Endlesslypatient82 · 19/08/2022 06:41

Yes it was me that made that point!

i was just picking up the statement that someone can’t be pissed off about something they know nothing about

Report
Yousee · 19/08/2022 07:04

No, your equating two different things - literally not knowing anything about something is different than twisting facts to suit your rage.
If you didn't know foreigners existed, you would not be upset about them taking your jobs.
If you didn't know a conversation took place, you would not be upset about what was said.

Report
Endlesslypatient82 · 19/08/2022 07:33

Confused.com! I’ll bow out

Report
Flowerpower2022 · 19/08/2022 07:57

Sorry I think all four adults involved with this 9 year old need to sit down and figure out how you can prioritise him. None of you is doing that. All of you have more important things to do than looking after and thinking about him.

Report
RoseAndRose · 19/08/2022 08:04

Flowerpower2022 · 19/08/2022 07:57

Sorry I think all four adults involved with this 9 year old need to sit down and figure out how you can prioritise him. None of you is doing that. All of you have more important things to do than looking after and thinking about him.

Have you actually RTFT?

OP and DH happily had DSS at the drop of a hat for an extra night, and were fine with him being there until the last moment before a prior engagement. They also regularly have him over on their non-contact days (so what should be 50/50 is more like 60/40)

If anyone needs to work out how to prioritise him, it's his DMum. She was the one unable to pick him up after her night out (during her time with him, as he should have been back the previous day)

Report
aSofaNearYou · 19/08/2022 08:41

Flowerpower2022 · 19/08/2022 07:57

Sorry I think all four adults involved with this 9 year old need to sit down and figure out how you can prioritise him. None of you is doing that. All of you have more important things to do than looking after and thinking about him.

WITH the 9 year old? Sounds very weird? In any case, the only people that need do this are mum and dad.

Report
Yousee · 19/08/2022 09:04

I'd not be sitting down to discuss how I could prioritise a step child. Who would be prioritising my child if everyone was so focused on his brother?
No, his own mother can learn to prioritise her son, and the DH can continue as he is balancing both his childrens needs.

Report
Liz1tummypain · 19/08/2022 12:19

Yousee · 19/08/2022 09:04

I'd not be sitting down to discuss how I could prioritise a step child. Who would be prioritising my child if everyone was so focused on his brother?
No, his own mother can learn to prioritise her son, and the DH can continue as he is balancing both his childrens needs.

this is why we get these threads .

Report
fufflecake · 19/08/2022 12:21

Flowerpower2022 · 19/08/2022 07:57

Sorry I think all four adults involved with this 9 year old need to sit down and figure out how you can prioritise him. None of you is doing that. All of you have more important things to do than looking after and thinking about him.

Why?! Why do 4 adults need to get involved here? There's only 2 that need to do this

Report
fufflecake · 19/08/2022 12:22

Liz1tummypain · 19/08/2022 12:19

this is why we get these threads .

You mean because the actual patents expect the whole world to revolve around their children apart from their own world obviously

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Yousee · 19/08/2022 12:31

I'd rather see thread after thread about some woman or other freaking out that another woman wasn't prioritising her child than for SMs children to be placed at the bottom of the pile, even by their own mothers. 🤷‍♀️

Report
whumpthereitis · 19/08/2022 12:34

Liz1tummypain · 19/08/2022 12:19

this is why we get these threads .

Because parents have unrealistic expectations when it comes to stepparents?

Yes.

Report
fufflecake · 19/08/2022 12:37

Yousee · 19/08/2022 12:31

I'd rather see thread after thread about some woman or other freaking out that another woman wasn't prioritising her child than for SMs children to be placed at the bottom of the pile, even by their own mothers. 🤷‍♀️

I hear you!

At least other stepparents will know they aren't alone in questioning the madness some parents try to force on them

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.