Sarkar comes across as kind of the natural heir of US '90s "shock jocks" like Howard Stern, Don Imus, Andrew Dice Clay, and Rush Limbaugh, getting attention (and ideally $) from a kind of weird, exaggerated performative misogyny.
For some reason, some provocateurs really love the idea of a woman being misogynist despite the fact that (1) misogyny is very easily internalised given how pervasive it is in our society and (2) supporting the status quo is lucrative; marketing that support as subversive and edgy perhaps even more so. "Not like the other girls", though, is getting a bit threadbare and I'm not sure it's necessarily going to be a winner in the current economy.
I personally raised an eyebrow or two last October when she became so determined to blanket discredit a BBC report on coercive rape of lesbians that she (accidentally?) equated lesbians' preference for women partners with racism. I'm not sure homophobia logically follows on from sexism with her base, even if lesbians logically SEEM like a tempting target.
For anyone worried that Sarkar might be cancelled, though, please take comfort!!!! She herself has helpfully explained why this is a positive thing, as a form or redistributive justice that only negatively impacts the most privileged in society, who of course have such resources that it doesn't negatively impact them.