I’m not up for that. Firstly I don’t think it’s right to damage things and injure people which is what, after all, one would be protesting against. Two wrongs don’t make a right. Secondly, I am a lone parent. If I take a stray half-brick the head, DD would be an orphan.
BUT I would definitely be up for the hitting some of these bastards where it really hurts. In the wallet. It’s effectively economic cancel culture, and it would require coordinated, targeted mass action. If everyone stopped buying at whichever petrol station has the highest profits until they bought them down, they’d bring them down, or go out of business (or be run at a thumping loss, I suppose)
The whole principle propping this up is the principe of competition and choice. That rests with the consumer. We have (at least in in theory) a choice in where to spend our money and which of ‘them’ we give the profits to. It would be mildly inconvenient for many people, and needs to come from the middle classes, because to put up with the inconvenience or to pay slightly more for something, you need to have a little spare in your budget, and not be working your arse off in two jobs already.
Amazon is a case in point. It’s raping the country by paying shit wages and minimal taxes, while finding its founder to drive giant penises on space joy-rides, and yet how many of ‘the people’ who hate this system and are suffering with poorer public services and austerity are merrily propping up it up by continuing to shop there? The whole brand culture hides the people making the profits and insulates them them from the consequences of their public actions. I bet I am unwittingly lining Jacob Reese Mogg or Boris Johnson’s pockets, somehow. Which is a horrible thought. I imagine it’s impossible to completely boycott an individual, but if it were possible to boycott anything he has an interest in, I would. And if enough people did, he’d be persona non grata pretty quick, and then either be forced to consider the poor as real people, or, eventually, become poor. If they didn’t own the bloody press as well, it would be easier. But it would take a specialist to track down an accurate list, a dedicated team to maintain it and a LOT of people to make a little consistent effort to actually do it. And they won’t.
I have no idea if this information is available, or how easy it is to get. I imagine very difficult, as the are so many shell companies and wotnot (by design, of course). I also imagine that anyone publishing it would be shot down pretty quickly. I mean, Brexit was purely about tax dodging buy the very rich, as the EU was planning to bring in laws that stopped tax dodging to some degree. And look what happened there.
I try to spend my money in places that have transparency about who owns them and where it goes. It’s not really totally possible though. Firstly, if I need a mortgage, I need the best rate I can get. I’m not rich enough to get one on the principe of who owns it’s parent company. And secondly, sooner or later you need something that can not now be provided by a local independent. You need energy, internet, petrol, the postal service etc. I had years of never setting foot in a supermarket, because I bought all my food from local farmers or indie shops. I can’t afford to do that now, and I don’t have the time and energy to make everything from scratch now I have a child. Also, as things become profitable (like anything eco) big businesses start to want a slice and gradually the fat cats start to get the their finger into all the pies. It’s hard work being ethical and families just don’t have the time, the energy and the money. It sounds like a tin-hat conspiracy theory, but the monied classes really do have a vested interest in keeping working people busy so that they don’t start wondering to hard how come all the money flows upwards. Most people know this really, but somehow nothing ever changes.