I am so peed off with my DH over this issue that I dont know if I am being unreasonable about his solution.
I WFH but try to get into the office a day a week (its a 2.5 hr round trip). We are being asked to come in more frequently but it isn't being enforced at the moment so I am not under pressure from my employer to come in.
Sometimes I need to go in to get paper files and it is nice to see colleagues - I am suffering a bit from lack of motivation by being stuck working on my own in my room all day.
The kids are on school holidays (been off for 5 long weeks now) and it is very difficult to WFH with them here. They are teen and pre-teens so fairly self sufficient but its the constant noise, arguing, request for screens/food etc that are a constant distraction.
DH agreed with his boss last April that he could WHF two days a week which would allow me to go into the office. It still hasn't happened yet. I have explained that it is putting me under pressure, I am snapping at the kids, they hate me down in the room working all day as they feel I am here but not here IYSWIM. DH has never WFH so he really doesn't understand how difficult it is.
His boss needs to organise the connection to the system for him to WFH and it hasn't been done yet.
I have been on to him a few times lately but it just isn't a priority for him. I emailed him today about it and his solution was that he would take 2 days annual leave next week so I can go into the office.
He only has 6 days AL left this year and I wanted to spend them doing things as a family not with him being at home and me in work. I see it as a waste of his AL when all he has to do is organise to WFH or I also suggested we pay someone to mind them.
I know he sees this as a perfectly acceptable solution and if I say anything he will complain that he cant win.
So AIBU to think this is a cop out solution and AL should be saved for emergencies and family time. I feel like he is just kicking the can down the road and he thinks this will get me off his back for a short while.