That's very strange as 'classic autism' is/was a proper diagnosis. There are/were 3 possible autism diagnosis, classic autism, Asperger's, and PDD-NOS. Very odd that they took exception to it
@Fladdermus - I did make that point whilst they were tearing me a new one! 😂Apparently, medical professionals are amongst the worst offenders when it comes to using ableist language, and any "qualifier" (including classic, severe, mild, etc) is ableist because you can only be autistic or neurotypical.
I know that Aspergers is not in the most recent DSM, but I think it's still used in some places. I kind of understand that being removed, because Asp was a Nazi eugenicist and his research into autistic people that led to the term being coined was not entirely ethical (to put it mildly!)
I personally don't like the high/low functioning because I don't think they are accurate at conveying information about how an autistic person experiences life, e.g.
Can't tie shoes - low functioning
Brilliant at Chess - high functioning
Socially inept - low functioning
Memorised entire London Underground at age 4 - high functioning
Couldn't write basic letters until age 6 - low functioning
All of them are DS! High IQ but EHCP since nursery and FT 1:1 teaching assistant since preschool. Floundering in mainstream, but local specialist places don't tend to cater for mainstream ability.