Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Women are now womb carriers

79 replies

Callingoccupants · 24/06/2022 09:47

Women are being attacked, again. A long standing publishing company, Verso Books, has decided women should be referred to as womb carriers. Can it get any worse? Will try and provide a link.

OP posts:
FlumpyLump · 24/06/2022 10:56

I'm pretty sure that men want to keep the title of "men" or "man" or "male" which explains why they not being referred to as simply testicle carriers. It wouldn't fly.
But women are expected to put up with this crap? It's beyond a joke.

334bu · 24/06/2022 11:00

Seeing as women bang on about the sanctity of their uteruses and their wonderful life-giving fecundity and how their purpose in life is to bring forth a child, earth mother bs etc. etc. It's hardly surprising they're being reduced to their wombs.Can't have it both ways, transphobes. Either your cervix is defining or not.

So it is ok to refer to a marginalised group such as Native American and First Nation women as body parts? Wow, you really don't like women do you?

WifeMotherWorkRepeat · 24/06/2022 11:01

So women are now referred to an anatomical part so as not to offended the perpetually offended minority?!?! Well I’m a woman and I’m offended. This is disgusting.

Topgub · 24/06/2022 11:02

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

onlywhenidream · 24/06/2022 11:03

Women can be defined as people with a biological cervix

But women are more than just that part of their biology - it's the PEOPLE part that's relevant most of the time

We spend generations trying to persuade society to recognise the people part and here we have others suggesting that if women want to be recognised a women they have to forgo the people part and just be a thing with a cervix

purpleboy · 24/06/2022 11:04

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Well said 👏🏼👏🏼

Brefugee · 24/06/2022 11:06

The whole point of feminism was to stop us being reduced to being body parts which makes language like this so depressing.

I'm all for inclusion, i really have no issue with it. But i do have a problem with the word woman being excised. I would have a problem with the word man being excised too, but i just don't see that happen (it is possible i am not looking in the right places, that's not my fight)

purpleboy · 24/06/2022 11:06

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

What every woman does this?
Even those that can't or don't want children?

Be careful the mask slipped and your misogyny is on full display here.

MsES · 24/06/2022 11:06

This infuriates me. Disgusting misogyny.

driedgrassinavase · 24/06/2022 11:07

Brefugee · 24/06/2022 10:55

Can't have it both ways, transphobes. Either your cervix is defining or it isn't.

there it is. There can be no sensible discussion as long as stupid statements like this are still a thing. I am neither a transphobe nor a terf, and i would welcome inclusive language. But there are women without wombs, as transwomen and people with hysterectomies know. So either they are women or not. But the womb doesn't define them.

The blog piece being quoted is about abortions so although you might not like it, it is accurate.

MsES · 24/06/2022 11:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Found the misogynist.

Polkadotties · 24/06/2022 11:08

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

My cervix doesn’t define. I am a woman. It’s in my DNA, my chromosomes. You can chop off my breasts, remove my womb, and I will still be a woman.

TheKeatingFive · 24/06/2022 11:09

Seeing as women bang on about the sanctity of their uteruses and their wonderful life-giving fecundity and how their purpose in life is to bring forth a child, earth mother bs etc.

C'mon now, you can do better than this piece of reductive nonsense.

TheKeatingFive · 24/06/2022 11:10

I can get on board with it actually, so long as the term male becomes obsolete in favour of 'dick possessors'.

Topgub · 24/06/2022 11:11

@TheKeatingFive

Prostate owners

Brefugee · 24/06/2022 11:14

The blog piece being quoted is about abortions so although you might not like it, it is accurate.

eh? The entirety of my point is that the word woman exists. And that if we are going to be inclusive we can say "women and other people with wombs" (or ... and other people who have abortions or.... and other people who have periods)

it is downright stupid, dangerous and idiotic to ignore the word woman. It puts people's health at risk. (people with learning difficulties, or who don't speak English well or whatever) The idea is to be MORE INCLUSIVE.

Around 50% of the population are women. A percentage (that i have no idea about) is trans. It is not 50% though. So why not include the word that describes the majority, and then include the minority too? That is what inclusion is about.

Brefugee · 24/06/2022 11:16

i re-read the whole thread again @driedgrassinavase what blogpost are you talking about?

You do know what this thread is about, right?

CandyLeBonBon · 24/06/2022 11:19

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Tell me you're a misogynist without telling me you're a misogynist!

UWhatNow · 24/06/2022 11:20

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Naunet · 24/06/2022 11:25

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

The fuck are you talking about? Misogynistic rubbish.

Naunet · 24/06/2022 11:28

TheKeatingFive · 24/06/2022 11:10

I can get on board with it actually, so long as the term male becomes obsolete in favour of 'dick possessors'.

Sperm sacks?

TheKeatingFive · 24/06/2022 11:29

Sperm sacks?

I like that one 😆

Immaterialatthispoint · 24/06/2022 11:44

@Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g thanks

@Callingoccupants Bit much to call me ridiculous. I didn’t deny it had happened, I asked to see more info before commenting: you provided a daily Mail link and I simply said I wasn’t clicking that!

TheWayoftheLeaf · 24/06/2022 11:46

But I'm not carrying a womb... it's part of me like all my other organs. Will they call all humans skin walkers? Hair growers? Tit Havers? 😂😂

JustHereWithMyPopcorn · 24/06/2022 12:00

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Well said.

Swipe left for the next trending thread