Partner and I are unmarried. We have a three yo called hisname-myname, which his family shorten to just hisname. I wanted to call her myname-hisname but gave in because it felt easier at the time, and my name comes after his in alphabetical order.
I do about 99% of the parenting, while working full time and earning about the same as him, and have done so throughout our child's life, including through 4 early pregnancies and 3 miscarriages. Not a single lie-in for my in 3 years and that's through pregnancy tiredness, blood loss tiredness, major work deadlines causing me to work late etc. I missed bedtime twice, once for work and once because I was at A&E for a miscarriage - so no social life at all for me on top of no sleep in the mornings. I've no reason to think this will be any different for this second child, it'll be me doing pretty much all the work.
Currently expecting our second child, which we are hoping will make it as it's outlived all the miscarriages by now.
I want to call it myname-hisname.
We're unmarried so I believe that's 100% my call. He can refuse to be on the birth certificate, that's 100% his call. But legally he has no say on the name.
Obviously he had a huge hissy fit, accused me of wanting to break up. I don't, it wouldn't be good for the children, although tbh personally I don't think it would change my own life that much.
But every other person I ask is going hmmm, bad idea, can't I compromise and let him have his way on this one, it'll traumatise the kids to have different last names etc.
I don't get it. The kids will know they're siblings, they'll have the same names just in a different order. In divorce/remarried families children have different last names all the time. I can see why a child would be unhappy because they have a long commute to see their other bio parent, or if they don't get on with the step-parent they live with, but different surnames from their siblings, really, is that an issue?
AIBU to not give him this?