thank you for your replies everybody. xxx
I found it interesting a review of the dr came up a few weeks back on a platform/ website that said 'rough with me when he examined me... left feeling mistreated and violated' it has since been taken down though (defamation). so i suspect it's not just me. (and this was after my complaint)
nhs gynae examined me by asking me to cough, strain, he even got me to stand up and still couldn't find any prolapse. he/gp explained 2+ is a large/significant prolapse. maybe said dr could have said this in good faith??
in the doctors statement he explains he got me to cough and strain. he didn't ask me to do either, I would have expected this, it was an alarm bell that he didn't ask me. it didn't 'feel' like an examination for a prolapse (not that I really know what this would entail.... just an educated guess) At the time I thought I was being examined for an episiotomy which I believe he knew I hadn't had because I had told him I had 'no stitches' which he had documented in his notes.
although he examined my RHS vagina (whilst lying down on LHS) as 'that's where episiotomies are normally done'. are episiotomies normally performed on the RHS?
I thought maybe he had got confused, my gp said you can sometimes feel episiotomy scars just inside the vagina but it didn't feel i was being examined 'just' inside. he also explained he did a visual examination... we wasn't low down- looking up my dress. he was stood up- behind me- felt solely like a digital exam. (my gp and nhs gynae- was very apparent they were looking at me/ parted my labia to see entrance of vagina to assess for prolapse).
I think that's why I'm so confused. I was expecting to be examined. Just not expecting fingers to be demonstrating a penis going into my leg etc etc think i was shocked and confused I just lay there. I also thought if he thought sex was painful, why poke me so hard!? I questioned if he was actually trying to hurt me.
it just unfolded in a way I wasn't expecting and I can't work out why it went so far off script when I went in wanting an opinion re prolapse. or maybe there is some gynaecological reasoning- maybe he thought a prolapse caused by a deficient perineum because of a torn muscle/ episiotomy?!?!
I think the fact he has denied what has happened and given a different narrative in his statement doesn't fill me with confidence.
maybe i'll never really understand why the examination unfolded in the way that it did. just so glad i didnt go under the knife. upsets me, had I not got a hubby at home and supportive gp/ nhs gynae telling me that everything is normal, I would have still been worrying that I needed cosmetic/ reconstructive surgery. I've learnt to go to gp with future worries!!! xx