I get that people have more in common.
Hoever, on paper thats us .
We are for example ethical /green as are are they. The new folk .. they dont seem to have those values as central eg fly long haul, hi plastic comsumption . Am not saying anyone wrong or right. I am talking about things in common.
The ' old' group very inclusive of others, the new v much couple oreintated .
We have similar art intrerests and taste and politics. For eg.
The' old 'group didnt watch much tv at all ... Reads, not into popular culture or celebs.
New folk. Have big tv on as background, watch tv a great deal. Daytime etc and celeb etc stuff
..
The comminality is both parties have a good income and no longer need to work ( age 50).
What I struggle with is , apart from the other dw seemingly being dropped.. no idea why.. is ,did we actually know them.?. on paper we have far more in common.
Books v confessional mags.
Not much tv cf to freq/constant tv
Selective tv ( for want of a better word) vs celeb tv .
Enviromental stuff being important v does not seem on radar..
Inclusive( or was) v couples
Art, spirituality alternative( a bit). V . not at all .
So whilst I understand what you are saying, on paper we are the ones with the things in common.
We used to have such a laugh.
Other dw , who we used to invite to do things with, and I will,continue
to i
nclude in things I arrange have said that the new cple dw seems to sort of ignore them. I did not raise this until a mutal friend said she was going to ask the new dw had she done something wrong and that she cool towards her .