@tectonicplates
I also often deliberately dress to subvert the tyranny of fashion
I have to laugh at all the people who think they're being subversive
by being "anti-fashion". Toast and Cos are still fashion companies. They still go through a multi-stage design process, choosing colours, sampling, manufacturing, testing, modelling, identifying and targeting their target audience, and clearly very careful marketing to create their chosen vibe. It's still part of the fashion industry. You're about as subversive as teenage Goths who think they're all individuals until they start going to gigs and realising everyone's wearing the same band t-shirt. Toast and Cos sell thousands of clothes every year, all to people who want the same look as you. There's no such thing as anti-fashion. Everything is influenced by something.
Again, I’m not sure how many times I can repeat things.
Obviously I’m not an individual in terms of fashion sense. I have never claimed to be. Nor am I being anti-fashion by shopping from a particular brand. I have never claimed to be.
Obviously I understand exactly how marketing works - it’s very basic and straightforward and anyone who isn’t a complete numpty knows all that.
I said I’ve been anti-fashion in my time, and I have.
I’m talking here specifically about the tyranny of fashion in terms of ideal of the female form, female dress, female behaviour and female attractiveness. I subvert the idea, every time I choose to wear this type of clothing, that a woman should dress to flatter her figure, to attract or keep a man, or that she must always try to ‘look her best’ or choose ‘pretty/sexy’ items to wear. I like to actively say, no, I don’t want to play that particular game.That’s all.
However I don’t do that all the time. I’m not a cardboard cut-out.
I’m not claiming to be above human psychology. Because that would be stupid. However I can still make what choices I do or don’t make with certain principles in mind, in a way that is as intellectually honest and authentic as possible.