Or perhaps scrap anyone who does their job exceptionally well and only give it those who contribute to society through voluntary work.
It would certainly stop awards for those who happened to be blessed with talent/ athleticism.
Definitely agree that the award for Emma Radacanu is OTT.
I'd agree with all this.
A crossing lady near us got an award a few years back. For turning up to work for an hour, twice a day - which she was paid for, and it was hardly groundbreaking work.
I mean, most of us turn up for work. I do get annoyed at the number of civil servants who get them - again, for going to work. It is just bizarre.
I'd also like to see some sort of criteria for volunteering too. There have been numerous awards for people who stepped forward since COVID hit - which is admirable - but I know dozens of people who have been volunteering for decades (literally). Why does someone volunteering for 12 or 18 months get recognised, when thousands of people put in hours every week for 20, 30, 40, 50, 60 years never get acknowledged.
Someone always comes on these threads to say "You could nominate them" - but as mentioned above, it isn't always that easy. Maybe with more of a structure or framework to the system, more longstanding volunteers would be recognised and those who are turning up at work might not get so many awards.