Ex’s father died earlier this year and he shared an interest with ds1 and had a collection related to it. This collection has been given to ds by ex from his gf. It is worth some money – not a life-changing amount, but an amount that would come in very handy in a few years when the dc are reaching adulthood and would – probably a few thousand.
Nothing was given to ds2. He is a bit younger, only a couple of years, and doesn’t share this interest – in fact he hates it! I only know about this via the dc so have no way of knowing whether this was set out in a will or ex just thought ds would like the collection (ex also shares this interest, which makes me think it was his df’s wishes to give it to ds rather than his own, whether unofficially or in a will.) Ex was left enough money to buy a £200k house outright.
AIBU to think something should be set aside for ds as well? I know it’s none of my business, especially if ex fil made the decision, but I feel like even if my parents did something like this (they wouldn’t) I’d make it right via my share. My view is coloured by the fact that ex is absolutely shit with money, pays no CM and doesn’t work. Lives via a few cash in hand jobs, benefits and hand outs from his mum (divorced from his dad). Therefore, he is unlikely to ever leave anything to the dc himself and this inequality will never be made up in my view.
Today, when the dc mentioned this (they’re just back from a trip to their dad’s when the collection was given to ds) I blurted out that ds should share it with ds2 if it is ever sold – it was ds1 who mentioned it s worth and that was what prompted my comment. I know I have no right to enforce that, and couldn't anyway, but I’m pissed off at this. DS2 is constantly made to feel inferior by ex and his family, often, but not only, as a result of this shared interest, and this is the latest in a long line of incidents. Regardless, I just think it's so unfair.
AIBU to think it’s completely shit?