Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

2nd thread: AIBU to OBJECT to being asked to reframe my trauma by Edinburgh Rape Crisis CEO?

88 replies

herewegogc · 13/08/2021 12:55

Hi all 2nd thread as the last one was filling up fast.

OP posts:
OP posts:
herewegogc · 13/08/2021 12:59

Sorry, 1st thread https://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/amiibeingunreasonable/4319777-AIBU-to-be-asked-to-reframe-my-trauma-by-the-trans-CEO-of-Scottish-Rape-Crisis

Haven't done this before!

OP posts:
mnmumak · 13/08/2021 13:01

Your voting is a bit off I think.

Am I being unreasonable to be asked to reframe my trauma? ‘You’re being unreasonable to be asked’ I.e. the CEO is unreasonable. But people will vote YANBU meaning you’re not being unreasonable and think that YABU is calling YOU unreasonable. So the vote won’t mean anything here as you’re asking really whether someone else is unreasonable to ask you.

Mulletsaremisunderstood · 13/08/2021 13:03

Glad this is still going, I hope the media keeps talking about it. There's another story in the Times this morning.

Hopefully it keeps the pressure on, however I have a feeling this person is so self absorbed that they will not be going anywhere soon. They will reframe it as being attacked.

beastlyslumber · 13/08/2021 13:03

Can you take down the thread and try again with a clearer question? Or edit so the AIBU is clear?

Rainbowshit · 13/08/2021 13:03

Agree that you should have made the voting clearer.

StarDrawers · 13/08/2021 13:03

Yeah I'd ignore the voting for this one.

But no, if someone has been raped they don't need to reframe it for anyone's sake unless it helps them.

ColourMagic · 13/08/2021 13:10

The voting question is very confusing.

It should be "AIBU to object to being asked to reframe my trauma by the trans CEO of Scottish Rape Crisis?"

Or similar, but clearer.

ColourMagic · 13/08/2021 13:11

Can you ask MN to change the thread title to something much clearer (wording specified by you)

ThumbWitchesAbroad · 13/08/2021 13:13

I've said YANBU because I understand where you're coming from and was on the last thread - but I totally agree you need to ask MNHQ to change the title to AIBU to OBJECT to being asked to reframe my trauma etc.

They can change the title - just report your opening post and ask them.

Lockheart · 13/08/2021 13:13

@beastlyslumber

Can you take down the thread and try again with a clearer question? Or edit so the AIBU is clear?
Thank you, it's been bugging me all week.

What you mean is are Rape Crisis Scotland unreasonable.

Not "am I being unreasonable to be asked" which is a complete dogs dinner.

YouSetTheTone · 13/08/2021 13:17

Glad this is still being discussed too. I was on the thread in AIBU earlier this year when MW was appointed CEO and it seems clear that everything that people feared was inappropriate about the appointment is coming to pass.

It makes me desperately angry that this person is being allowed to influence policies from this position of power. A person who does not believe that women are entitled to request a female medical examiner in the aftermath of a rape should never have been made CEO of a rape centre crisis, and here we are now…

Surely these opinions of MW demonstrates extreme misogyny apart from anything else? How is an extreme misogynist allowed to be the CEO of a rape crisis centre?

endofthelinefinally · 13/08/2021 13:21

I mentioned the need for clear wording on the last thread, but I was just a little bit too late.
I can't work out whether my response should be YABU or YANBU, to the title of the thread.

Beowulfa · 13/08/2021 13:23

Clearer voting question could be:

AIBU to ask if this rape charity CEO is a fit and proper person for the role?

Or if that is deemed too antagonistic to a named individual:

AIBU to give a shit about rape victims?

DrSbaitso · 13/08/2021 13:25

I've had conversations with TRAs/their supporters (civil ones) in which they keep asking the question: is it fair to restrict someone based on their body/anatomy?

Obviously it is a disingenuous and unintelligent question in the same vein as "are you still beating your wife", but the fact that they frame it this way is interesting. They've all been male as far as I can tell.

Women do not ask this because women accept that there are some things that being female prevents you from doing. We know that we can't have children past a certain point. We know that having children will change our bodies permanently. We know that we can never hold the world record for overall fastest and strongest. We may of course say that being female doesn't prevent us from driving lorries or becoming mechanical engineers, because it doesn't. But we do accept there are some things a female body simply cannot do, and many things it is unlikely to be able to do (eg fight off a male attacker).

It's a very male idea that the only thing a male body should prevent you from doing is pregnancy/childbirth/lactation. The idea that it might hold you back from something you want that isn't related to reproduction is not at all alien to women, but it's very alien to men. So when someone feels that having a natally (and in this case legally) male body shouldn't stop them from doing anything they want to do, even and especially among the most vulnerable of women, it's hard not to see the whole thing as appropriation rather than co-identification.

It's a very, very masculine outlook.

vivariumvivariumsvivaria · 13/08/2021 13:33

Also reluctant to vote on that question.

Having a MN vote which shows the depth of feeling on the ONLY place where women's voices are heard on these matters could be really powerful.

I don't want to get it wrong. MN will edit it for you if you ask them, they've allowed these threads to remain in AIBU.

Thanks, by the way, @MNHQ. I'm sure you are getting lots of flack back stage for it. I really appreciate this being allowed to stand.

Helleofabore · 13/08/2021 13:45

Just plopping some background on this thread so that new readers have a fuller background on this person's previous interviews and statements. For context, as per their statement last night that their statement on this recent podcast was taken out of 'context.'

This is the transcript from the Buzz feed Provoke podcast that is dissected in that link from Eresh. It is MW's own words discussing their first call centre job.

In it they are not discussing how they were able to make women's (or men's) lives better, they were discussing power and how they attained it through the persona of "Louise".

At 5.12 in the You're Kiddin', Right video, MW says this.

"It was the first time I experienced power. It was a call centre job where we were the customer service for the benefit card that was being rolled out in the United States, in certain States. Where people who were receiving food stamps and cash benefits from the local state governments were now receiving it on an electronic card."

So they were transitioning from whatever system was there before to the electronic card. And I was responsible for whatever the person had phoned me about, you know I could do whatever they asked me to and I experienced this complete powerfulness. This idea that I was in charge and it wasn't me, it was Louise who was in charge. And this is how I discovered Louise."

"When I was shocked with fear about anything, I would call on Louise. And Louise could do whatever. So, in my most difficult moments I spoke as Louise. And Louise (the western woman's name they chose to convince Americans' they were also American') could do whatever. She could do anything. In my most difficult moments, I spoke as Louise. And Louise had a very Southern drawl. I have lost it. But I was very good at it."

"It was so racist as well, because most of my colleagues sounded Indian, no matter how hard they tried and whenever I came on the phone you could hear, um, (indistinguishable) who would say 'finally a white American'."

www.buzzsprout.com%2F1219151%2F4569950-provokecast-episode-1-mridul-wadhwa

Quite a bit of 'context' really.

Helleofabore · 13/08/2021 13:49

I think that this was an interesting interview from back in 2019.

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3597742-Forth-Valley-Rape-Crisis-Centre?pg=2&order=

Transcript: from JackyHolyoake's post (Thank you JackyHolyoake )

Fox Fisher: I'm here in Stirling to meet Mridal Wadwha, who is a trans woman who also runs a rape crisis centre. Let's go say hello.

Mridul Wadwha: I am Mridul Wadwha. I am trans and a Piscean. A mother. A wife. Half zoroastrian, half Hindu. I'm an immigrant. I run a rape crisis centre. I'm a feminist. I'm a boss. And I speak my mind even when I shouldn't.

FF: Mridul, tell me a bit about where we are and how you came about to work here.

MW: This is the Forth Valley Rape Crisis Centre and I am the Manager. So the centre works with anyone over the age of thirteen who has experienced sexual violence. And anyone who is affected by it. The centre is part of the rape crisis movement. We are a woman only space in the sense that only women work in the centre. Although we work with anyone who's been affected respective of gender identity. I think one of the key things that I'm proud of that has happened in this movement is the increased awareness about forced marriage in Scotland. And how we worked pretty hard to make sure that the law was implemented effectively. Most of our services, violence against women services, largely cater to white, cis women. But there are others that do naturally come to our spaces. You can't expect people to know that you are inclusive if you're not explicit of your inclusion. So, I think our journey around inclusion as a violence against women movement is ... we are getting there, but I think there are some key things that we have to do. And consistently, because equality is too fragile. I spend most of my life thinking about the status of minority ethnic women and migrant women in particular. Any minority who experiences oppression, you expect to be treated badly wherever you go. So you steel yourself up for that. So when you say: "We are inclusive" .. well. you have to show what you are doing not to treat people badly. Can you connect with people's humanity? For me it is an investment in attitude. We need to expose ourselves to difference so that difference is normal. We just dare not to think of ourselves as different.

FF: Is there a personal reason for getting into this line of work?

MW: Staying on has been personal because it is pretty clear to me that I was the only transwoman in the women's aid movement. And I wasn't even sure that if I had been hired, if they had known that I was trans. When I came out individually to various colleagues, there was this disbelief: "Oh, you can't be trans". You know, what does a trans person look like? What does a cis woman look like? How do we know? Over a period of time it became more and more important within my work in this movement to be a transwoman. My activism wasn't around trans activism because really what mattered to me more was my status as an immigrant woman and the women I worked with who came from immigrant backgrounds. It means I've had the opportunity to deliver training across this country and so invariably I would come out in all of my training, not just for people to change their perception of what an immigrant woman looks like or who she is, but also what a transperson looks like. So I think staying in it has become a personal thing.

FF: So tell me what it was like growing up for you and who was the first transperson you met?

MW: So I grew up in India. To me now I would say it was like living in a war zone. And it really came home to me, I really understood when people started speaking about the civil war in Syria and the use of snipers. That's the analogy I use. A sniper would hit me every day, multiple times. From name calling to sexual violence, all of that happened, all the time. When I became an adult, when I began to think a lot more practically and seriously about my transition it was empowering to have grown up in a country where there is a recognition of the third gender or the non-binary in a sense. A transperson I identified with? I don't think I ever met one. I didn't have any resources, I didn't know where to go. And then I remember that I chanced upon this article. A journalist had written an article about how they had set up a helpline for transpeople. So I went to meet this journalist and they put
me in touch with the local hospital's psychiatric unit. It was a complete nightmare, where this guy essentially told me "I don't believe you're trans because you would have insisted on going to a girls' school. Why did you go to a boys' school?" And all that sort of shit. It was like 'I am trans I'm not stupid'. But eventually I found some doctors elsewhere in a different city, but it was so expensive and trying to find a job and keep a job was a challenge.

So when I was 17-18 and I made a decision after a failed suicide attempt. I wanted to thrive. I just didn't want to ... manage. So I think coming to that decision was very transformative. I just said to people: "This is who I am, take it or leave it."

I got two gifts. One was that I grew up in a household where my parents, not in any every day way ever told me not to be who I was, this effeminate child. But I also grew up to a spiritual outlook that doesn't have a concept of guilt in the same way. I think that has been the biggest gift. I don't know what it feels like to be guilty or ashamed of who you are. I have been lucky somehow to find myself in places where I was able to influence. And I think it is therefore important if you have been given this opportunity by fate to use that effectively. It's a responsibility to be your honest and true self at all times. I have the gift of being the eternal minority.

From growing up in a mixed faith background to being a transwoman; to being a person of colour here, and a migrant. What is important for me therefore in doing this work is to try and do something to make sure that others who come after me can come on their own merit. But I think what is most important right now is for more diverse voices to be heard. Whether it is the survivors of sexual violence, or my colleagues who do a lot better work than I do. I need to make sure that my colleagues who I manage here, that their ideas really come to fruition. That is the most important reason why I do this work. What I am really interested in is to make sure everyone that goes through here feels that they have a opportunity to express what is really going on for them. That's why it is important, because this movement, particularly the feminist women's movement that is built on the history of so many women who have transformed. One of the dangers of being in this movement sometimes is that we don't know when to let more people sit around the table. And I think I do know the importance of it. Because I just don't want to be the token trans BAME woman in Scotland for many things in many spaces. Hopefully that will not be forever, and hopefully people won't call me to speak at events anymore. Because I think that is important too. We have to become redundant. That's why it's important.

[A film by Fox Fisher and Owl]

end transcript

One of the things that also strikes me is

My activism wasn't around trans activism because really what mattered to me more was my status as an immigrant woman and the women I worked with who came from immigrant backgrounds.

To me there is a lack of acknowledging that for some immigrant women, it would be very important to know that the person that they were in contact with was actually a male.

And of course there is this:

But I also grew up to a spiritual outlook that doesn't have a concept of guilt in the same way.

The more I read their own words, the more it reinforces to me that this person is only really about themselves. There seems to be a detachment from the women they are supposed to be there for. There is always the performance of feminism and a political agenda.

RoseisMadder · 13/08/2021 13:50

All the links from previous spread for any newcomers
forwomen.scot/10/08/2021/the-real-crisis-at-rape-crisis-scotland/

mobile.twitter.com/Gillian_Philip/status/1425155716822753290

kareningalasmith.com/2020/07/08/trauma-informed-services-for-women-subjected-to-mens-violence-must-be-single-sex-services/

www.google.co.uk/amp/s/www.spiked-online.com/2021/01/22/why-are-we-protecting-the-feelings-of-rapists/amp/

www.mumsnet.com/Talk/womens_rights/3145470-Break-it-down-for-me

forwomen.scot/did-you-know/

womansplaceuk.org/2021/07/07/womens-prisons-male-transgender-prisoners/

medium.com/@rebeccarc/j-k-rowling-and-the-trans-activists-a-story-in-screenshots-78e01dca68d

www.jkrowling.com/opinions/j-k-rowling-writes-about-her-reasons-for-speaking-out-on-sex-and-gender-issues/

www.rollonfriday.com/news-content/dentons-campaigns-kids-switch-gender-without-parental-approval

threadreaderapp.com/thread/1424888879392464898.html

forwomen.scot/wp-content/uploads/2021/08/Mridul-Wadhwa-Guilty-Feminist-transcript.pdf

data.parliament.uk/writtenevidence/committeeevidence.svc/evidencedocument/women-and-equalities-committee/enforcing-the-equality-act-the-law-and-the-role-of-the-equality-and-human-rights-commission/oral/102570.html

mobile.twitter.com/drjesstaylor/status/1425009284614610949?s=21

mobile.twitter.com/MhairiHunter/status/1425343425587687426

thecritic.co.uk/reframe-your-trauma/

<a class="break-all" href="https://archive.is/2021.08.11-114849/www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bigoted-people-may-be-challenged-comments-by-trans-head-of-edinburgh-rape-crisis-sparks-controversy-xdcpfr0cv#selection-955.0-958.0" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">archive.is/2021.08.11-114849/www.thetimes.co.uk/article/bigoted-people-may-be-challenged-comments-by-trans-head-of-edinburgh-rape-crisis-sparks-controversy-xdcpfr0cv#selection-955.0-958.0

fairplayforwomen.com/transgender-male-criminality-sex-offences/

www.crimeandjustice.org.uk/resources/we-need-open-discussion-welfare-women-prison

grahamlinehan.substack.com/p/the-man-made-crisis-at-edinburgh?fbclid=IwAR3yySaVAszHnLZeUyE4rI-J-XfPxRpdZGISjffqU-Vdyh7pzik--xlUZjU

www.spiked-online.com/2021/08/11/now-even-rape-victims-are-being-called-bigots/

archive.is/gezUd

mobile.twitter.com/HazelTarragon/status/1425384110411943936

mobile.twitter.com/ForwomenScot/status/1425798105098854407?s=19

mobile.twitter.com/OkBiology/status/1337341319811883008

edinburghrapecrisis.wixsite.com/ercc/post/statement

edinburghrapecrisis.wixsite.com/ercc/post/statement

www.heraldscotland.com/politics/19509343.outcry-plan-educate-bigoted-rape-survivors-trans-rights/

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9888899/Scotland-let-pupils-aged-FOUR-change-gender.html

www.andywightman.com/archives/4634?fbclid=IwAR1qaqV1GYmLcxXer1aCkxL4SLdjLKXT4FRVx9ULm0rMjfVWZTuTPe6uI_E

www.persuasion.community/p/when-therapists-become-activists?r=36x6j&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=copy

RoseisMadder · 13/08/2021 13:50

*thread

Helleofabore · 13/08/2021 14:05

Awesome. Thanks RoseisMadder!

herewegogc · 13/08/2021 14:08

Sorry all, have been away from the thread. First time I have done this. I have asked MNHQ to change the title to (thanks to suggestions from PP)

AIBU to OBJECT to being asked to reframe my trauma by Edinburgh Rape Crisis CEO?

OP posts:
herewegogc · 13/08/2021 14:12

Yes, thank you RoseisMadder

OP posts:
Mulletsaremisunderstood · 13/08/2021 14:12

Or just object to the CEO altogether Grin.

Is there a petition to get rid of this person? They clearly need to go.

FindTheTruth · 13/08/2021 15:10

Mirdul Wadhwa on the Guilty Feminist Podcast insisted that “therapy is political”. The podcast didn't discuss the real effects on women, personal testimony or empathy but prioritised validating Wadhwa, and judging rape victims as prejudiced.

Wadhwa said women with “discriminatory” views who sought help after being sexually assaulted would be encouraged to “reframe their trauma”. That you can educate women out of wanting a female counsellor calling them bigoted, hateful and at fault to be judged.

Wadhwa was so incensed that a raped woman could request an actual female that Wadhwa defected to the Green Party. MW said it was discriminatory that transwomen (males who identify as women) wouldn’t be able to intimately examine rape victims if they didn’t want them to . Wadhwa hates the idea that actual women are allowed to say no to Wadhwa. This tells you everything you need to know about Wadhwas suitability to be near vulnerable women

Mridul Wadhwa a male born transwoman forces inclusivity as CEO of the Edinburgh rape crisis centre (ERCC) and member of Scottish Green Party, and believes women do NOT have a right to exclude men from their bodies or rape counselling.

Wadhwa laughed at a survivor while she stood up in a meeting at the Scottish Parliament to talk about how she needed single-sex spaces and sniggered and eye-rolled during a conversation about Male Violence against Women MVAW.

Wadhwa publically ponders that rape victims orgasm

Laughing in therapy? another thread about MW that a poster said they had had therapy from MW and that MW had laughed when she was talking about the rape. Also that MW had been scrolling on their phone/checking their watch in the session. MW has no interest whatsoever in helping anyone but MW.

MW claims to see 4 survivors a week "to stay connected to the cause" MW quote.

women responding to Wadhwa have been accused of attacking rape crisis centres by Mhairi Black who says "There is nothing feminist about attacking Rape Crisis Scotland”. There’s some confusion as RCS tweeted messages they received from their service users (vulnerable women who were angry) MONTHS ago AFTER voting against women’s right to single sex spaces

The GOOD NEWS is that other grass roots Rape Crisis Centres in Scotland are speaking out too. and pointing out that they don't have much choice about who they get their funding through here forwomen.scot/11/08/2021/scottish-womens-aid-have-failed-the-womens-aid-network/ and here forwomen.scot/10/08/2021/the-real-crisis-at-rape-crisis-scotland/

ARTICLES
Brendan O Neill for Spiked
www.spiked-online.com/2021/08/11/now-even-rape-victims-are-being-called-bigots/

The Critic
thecritic.co.uk/reframe-your-trauma/

Times
archive.is/gezUd