[quote ProcrastinationStation3]@80caloriesofbiscuitplease
Against what alternative source of information are they checked for accuracy? And by whom? I mean isn't that part of the protections that GDPR gives you, that you are able to check the information they hold is accurate?
What do you mean by check that there's no third party information? Data on other patients in your records? Wouldn't that be a GDPR problem anyway - anyone who legitimately looked at your record would see that information on the other patient inappropriately. If the error has been made why would it be legitimate for someone else to access that info, and not you, when the info is being held against your name, and may be affecting your care.
Or does whoever checks the record report it to the ICO each time they see data they have no legitimate reason to see i.e. that doesn't belong to a patient who's made a data access request?[/quote]
Some of the things which concern you apply more to mental health records than to records of physical treatment, where there might be information regarding other family members for instance, or it may be appropriate to record something told to a clinician by a third party.
Items may be redacted from the record if they affect someone else's confidentiality of if disclosure may cause serious harm to the requestor or to another person or persons. There used also to be a clause that said that in some cases the record could only be accessed in the presence of someone suitable to support the requestor and to explain the record but that seems to have vanished.
I think accuracy checks were more important when records were paper. old records get very tatty and dog eared and its sensible to check that pages are there and in order and so on.
I don;t know what you meant by this bit "Wouldn't that be a GDPR problem anyway - anyone who legitimately looked at your record would see that information on the other patient inappropriately. If the error has been made why would it be legitimate for someone else to access that info, and not you, when the info is being held against your name, and may be affecting your care."
I don't know what the system is now, its some 14 years since I retired but when i was working on designing it, there were levels of access depending on need and geography...so eg receptionists could see less than nurses, and people could see records for geographical areas that i worked in. Attempts to log in where you shouldn't were flagged to the system manager whether successful or not. There was also the concept of "pattern recognition" so that if someone viewed something that they were allowed to view but didn't usually, then this would also be flagged and investigated. usually it will be as simple as someone changing department or providing cover at another base of course,
useful link here but a bit old www.themdu.com/guidance-and-advice/journals/inpractice-december-2013/rights-of-access