@thatsjustwhatithink
You are wrong; I have condemned men in several posts. Unfortunately, you did not take the time to read them. But the thread is long, and labelling is easier.
For me, most of the men in public office are stuck in the 80s, and there should be more women in power.
There is a great article in The Times today, an interview with Caroline Slocock. She worked in the civil service; here is what she has to say:
"Women, I think, are different. The women I know who’ve made it to the top in politics — and elsewhere — genuinely do have a single-minded focus on the task in hand, working long hours getting to grips with the detail, not just grabbing the headlines. As a civil service aide, I’ve seen Margaret Thatcher and Margaret Hodge close to. Both genuinely had a “laser-like focus on the job” that neither Boris Johnson nor Matt Hancock could dream of. “If you want something said, ask a man,” our first female prime minister said, “but if you want something done, ask a woman.”
You say I am judging based on her sexual behaviour - anyone can have an affair, and I would not dream of judging. But, as I said before, it is their business.
But, as the notable civil servant in the article remarks, "should the taxpayer be paying for his mistress to mark his own homework?"
I read your post, and you are trying hard to look humble, yet you have labelled me a misogynist, a culturally diverse, someone you are trying to educate.
For a senior civil servant is very poor indeed.