Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Using God/Christ in negative threads

680 replies

Tigertalk · 30/05/2021 09:00

Hi all, I’m a long time mumsnetter but finding it hard to read constant threads (as a Christian) that use phrases starting with ‘ for G*d’s sake ( insert some nasty phrase about something) . We don’t accept racist or phobic language so why is it okay to use God, Jesus, Christ etc in these contexts? It’s really uncomfortable to read constantly 🙁

OP posts:
speakout · 30/05/2021 11:16

I think we need a bit of iconoclasm.

THe church has held sway for far too long, imposing damaging social dogmas- the subjugation of women, the persecution of homosexuals.
If this is part of prising the greasy tendrils of the church out of society then bring it on.

speakout · 30/05/2021 11:17

No one is being personally attacked by these utterances though- are they.

pear6782 · 30/05/2021 11:18

I agree with the OP. Using 'f*cking' in the middle of Jesus Christ is incredibly disrespectful. You don't hear people of other cultures using Allah or Krishna etc as a swear word - in fact, they would most likely be incredibly offended by it and consider it racist (and I say this as a person from an ethnic minority). Just because the UK is a predominately Christian country doesn't make it acceptable to use the name of Jesus Christ aka God in vain. You don't hear swear words incorporating the name of a God in such a way in the Middle East or Asia as commonplace. So why are we so proud of it in the UK, and why do people defend their right to swear in this way like it is something to be proud of???????

TableFlowerss · 30/05/2021 11:18

Not everyone shares your views. Christianity is dying out in the UK and particularly Scotland, whereby more people identify as atheist.

It’s part and parcel of the English language and has been for generations. I understand why you personally would like it but again, the majority of people don’t share your view.

KevinTheGoat · 30/05/2021 11:21

@pear6782

I agree with the OP. Using 'f*cking' in the middle of Jesus Christ is incredibly disrespectful. You don't hear people of other cultures using Allah or Krishna etc as a swear word - in fact, they would most likely be incredibly offended by it and consider it racist (and I say this as a person from an ethnic minority). Just because the UK is a predominately Christian country doesn't make it acceptable to use the name of Jesus Christ aka God in vain. You don't hear swear words incorporating the name of a God in such a way in the Middle East or Asia as commonplace. So why are we so proud of it in the UK, and why do people defend their right to swear in this way like it is something to be proud of???????
I take it you'd be OK with blasphemy laws coming into place then?
TableFlowerss · 30/05/2021 11:22

Too add- religion was given far too much power historically and whilst everyone should be entitled to go about their own religious beliefs in peace, the majority shouldn’t have to chance their language to accommodate this

MacCoffee · 30/05/2021 11:25

vm.tiktok.com/ZMe3kMT1u/

If you’re offended OP watch this.

MacCoffee · 30/05/2021 11:26

Then this .......

vm.tiktok.com/ZMe3kuwRL/

DumplingsAndStew · 30/05/2021 11:26

God made me this way 🤷🏼‍♀️

SimonJT · 30/05/2021 11:27

Why do so many people think christians own the word god or that god refers specifically to christianity?

stackemhigh · 30/05/2021 11:27

I think anyone who feels the need to say oh my fucking God or flying spaghetti monster or bleat about how God isn’t real are a bit pathetic and I would just avoid them. I live and let live but don’t need to associate with them any more than I need to,

SunnydaleClassProtector99 · 30/05/2021 11:28

As an atheist, I think it's an interesting concept.

Historically, I would have expected people to invoke god when they were afraid or awed. I don't have any historical sources to support the theory, perhaps someone else does, but could people saying, "Oh my god, save me, preserve me..." have been used for grave situations and shortened then gradually used in less and less solemn situations before it entered the common vernacular.

I did look up what is meant by 'taking the lord's name in vein' and was surprised to see that it actually refers to swearing false oaths to or on god. For example, a criminal swearing they're innocent in god's name or on the bible.
If you find it uncomfortable, it will be because people apply it in trivial ways, or by those with no belief, which I do get because it's not taking it seriously. At the same time, the word god is so commonplace in English language that I don't think it's a deliberate thing for most people. And perhaps a little unreasonable to expect people to curb their language for your sensibilities.
Ultimately, if you truly believe it's a mortal sin, it's going to affect the person's saying it's soul and not yours so it shouldn't bother you.

www.osvnews.com/amp/2020/05/26/is-it-considered-a-mortal-sin-to-say-oh-my-god/

Againstmachine · 30/05/2021 11:30

Do you know what happens when you someone takes offence, it's a thought process that's all, no one is actually hurt by being offended, if some decides to murder someone after being offended it's because they are a psychopath.

If you believe in something redicolous, then you have accept people will mock it.

People ought to understand people are allowed to push back after all harm religion has done over century's.

pear6782 · 30/05/2021 11:30

@KevinTheGoat

I think it is more to do with being respectful of all, rather than forcing people to speak/behave in a certain way because of law. Every religion/belief system teaches different things or has different values (and most of them contradict each other). So why do we show respect to some, but not others?

Freecuthbert · 30/05/2021 11:34

So many awful atrocities committed in the name of religion and I'm really meant to care about blasphemy?

seashells11 · 30/05/2021 11:34

Years ago I once reported a post for using the term Jesus f C* as very offensive....I was told that swearing was considered acceptable on MN. Spectacularly missing the point.

balloonsintrees · 30/05/2021 11:35

@EdgeOfACoin

Nobody uses Mohammed, Allah or Buddha as swear words. It would be considered quite offensive to do so.
Because they are not generic names and titles, god (with a small g) is. For God's sake can be considered by some as blasphemous even though it doesn't offend the second commandment, but for god's sake cannot be blasphemous because it is simply a word. For all the Christians who are up in arms about this non-issue, did it pass you by when Jesus said that there are only two commandments and that this supersedes the 613 mitzvot? This was the whole point of the existence of Jesus to show the Jewish people that they (at that time) had become too hide bound to the rules at the expense of loving God and His creation - this is the message of the story of the Good Samaritan.
Orchidflower1 · 30/05/2021 11:37

@ErrolTheDragon

These comments aren't directed at living people. It would be comparable to racism if people said 'f-ing Christian ' etc.
This but still doesn’t sit well.
Orchidflower1 · 30/05/2021 11:37

@LindaEllen

Given that god isn't real, I hardly think it matters.
Shame on you Linda for such aggressive posting.
KevinTheGoat · 30/05/2021 11:38

[quote pear6782]@KevinTheGoat

I think it is more to do with being respectful of all, rather than forcing people to speak/behave in a certain way because of law. Every religion/belief system teaches different things or has different values (and most of them contradict each other). So why do we show respect to some, but not others?[/quote]
Because Biblical swearing has been a thing for years, even in places like Ireland or Canada ('tabernacle!') Religious subjects are a taboo, hence religious swear words. Every country has different methods of swearing. Would you prefer 'cunt' or 'whore mother' or 'son of a bitch' or 'cocksucker'?

Christians are not a race and in the UK, they're predominantly white and the ruling religion, and I get the impression that some of them envy countries with sharia law and wish we had a Christian equivalent here.

Wrongsideofhistorymyarse · 30/05/2021 11:38

@Macncheeseballs

So you'll not be watching father ted then
Go on, go on, go on, go on...
SallySycamore · 30/05/2021 11:38

It looks very... slangy. You wouldn't generally see it written down, so I wonder if that's why it's particularly jarring? In spoken language it's used a lot (I agree it was originally an appeal to God), and on here people tend to write as they speak.

I don't really like it being mixed with swearing, but on it's own it doesn't bother me — it's so cultural now. One of my favourite teachers was very fond of a "Glory be!" if we were being particularly awkward, and she was a devout Catholic. Grin And I think the first song in Legally Blonde is very funny. I agree I don't like to hear children say it though.

I'd describe myself as Christian, but to be honest I'm probably a fairly bad one! I'm fairly sure I'm only Christian because of the time and place I was born — I feel that the Roman or Norse gods, Islam, Hinduism etc are all different ways of describing the same thing, just with different cultural (and temporal) interpretations.

Orchidflower1 · 30/05/2021 11:39

@seashells11

Years ago I once reported a post for using the term Jesus f* C** as very offensive....I was told that swearing was considered acceptable on MN. Spectacularly missing the point.
Everyone knows that mnhq moderators are all fair, unbiased and open minded, non bigots- not
DumplingsAndStew · 30/05/2021 11:39

Can you not just call on the strength of your Christian god to help you overcome your feelings of hurt over it?

grapewine · 30/05/2021 11:40

@wildeverose

I'm a Christian- it's not even close to racist or homophobic language. It's shockingly offensive you've compared the two.
Definitely this.
Swipe left for the next trending thread