I’m a GP and sometimes too avid mumsnetter (NC for this).
It’s very dispiriting that every time I look at the boards lately it feels like there is constant criticism of my profession. I fully understand the frustrations people have with not being able to access primary care and sympathise but surely people realise that we are experiencing unprecedented demand and the reason access is difficult is there are not enough clinicians available and not enough funding for practices and staff. It seems like the narrative is that the reason people to struggle to access a GP is that we’re all lazy and too busy eating biscuits to see patients. Is that really what the public thinks?
It feels like every bad encounter with a GP is used to smear the profession as a whole which I don’t see with other professions like nursing or secondary care docs. Of course there is no excuse for poor care but nobody is perfect and doctors are included in that. If you have one or even several poor encounters by all means complain and post for support but you should not generalise across a whole profession. Remember people who are satisfied with their GP care will be unlikely to post about it.
The other common complaint is “GPs are useless at mental health/gynae/etc” GPs vary a lot in their skill sets and interests and some have more expertise in certain areas than others. I am interested in both those areas for example and have undertaken more training in my own time and at my own cost. Certainly some GPs could benefit from more training in certain areas but the fact remains if we were to refer every patient to specialist services the services would not cope with the demand. In my area psychiatry services for example is reserved for the most severe mental illness, everything else is bounced straight back to us. The Royal College of GPs have been calling for GP training to be extended for several years - that would allow more training in specialist areas, this has not happened because the government won’t fund the extra training time. There are many postgraduate courses and diplomas GPs do in specialist areas but these are almost invariably funded by themselves, not the government or health boards.
Constantly stating on the internet that GPs are undertrained or not good enough in a particular area destroys the patient’s confidence in their doctor which can be detrimental to the clinical relationship.
The government want to run down primary care so they can get private providers in who will cherry pick the easy patients and the rest will be stuck. I firmly believe this will not offer a better service nor more value to the taxpayer. These threads are feeding exactly into that narrative.
AIBU to ask posters to consider this?