OP I'm sure you are a wonderful GP, so none of this is directed at you or a reflection of you but rather the points you are making and mostly the system in general. I am sure you like many of your colleagues are doing your absolute best.
The other common complaint is “GPs are useless at mental health/gynae/etc” GPs vary a lot in their skill sets and interests and some have more expertise in certain areas than others.
100% agree with that opinion, and there really is no excuse for this. Jack of all trades, master of fuck all? I can get on board with that absolutely if they send me to someone who is semi-skilled at the thing I need help with.
You cannot run it like a lottery where if you end up with a GP who has an interest(?!) in your thing, happy days, and if they don't, better luck next time. Call back at 8am tomorrow, pal. It's completely unacceptable.
the fact remains if we were to refer every patient to specialist services the services would not cope with the demand. In my area psychiatry services for example is reserved for the most severe mental illness, everything else is bounced straight back to us.
Then surely the services do not cope with the demand, people become more and more outraged as they're waiting 2 years, 3 years, 5 years, 10 years etc? Is that not why we have A&E waiting time targets that are reported on? 12 weeks waiting time for outpatient appointment on knee replacements etc? Where is the political will to apply waiting times (with funding and plans to meet them) if we don't get to the stage where someone assesses the list and says "shit guys, this is going to take 10 years".
And if it's the case of you actually cannot get them onto a waiting list because someone doesn't accept them... then what are GPs doing about that? Who are you reporting that to? Why isn't that person fixing it?
In my line of work as a Quality Manager in aerospace, if a process wasn't working or resulting in defects, they would be reported to me. From an 'unskilled' operator to an exec, they had to tell me and I had to investigate corrective and preventative action. That could mean ripping down an entire process, rewriting countless documents, and spending practically unlimited amounts of money if the cost analysis warranted it.
Would you expect anything less in the aircraft industry? We are talking about people's lives. Can't have planes falling out of the sky left and right killing people because an operator didn't speak up.
And yep, I am absolutely aware I am coming across as naive here, I have no clue about the problems and the processes. But neither does the general public. The general public who work in pharma, or aerospace, or manufacturing, christ even banking and finance, have basic process improvement initiatives and requirements to implement corrective action. Why hasn't your industry? And if it does, why is it clearly not working?
Can you imagine me coming on here to tell mumsnetters that a Boeing 737 fell out of the sky because "if we tested every single printed circuit board we wouldn't have enough test kits or technicians to keep up with the demand."
How much faith, exactly, would you have in Boeing? And would you accept my excuse? Would you speak kindly of Boeing if they ever came up in conversation?
The Royal College of GPs have been calling for GP training to be extended for several years - that would allow more training in specialist areas, this has not happened because the government won’t fund the extra training time.
So the Royal College of GPs accepts there is a problem then. And their initial suggestion of corrective action has not been acceptable after cost analysis. So maybe the Royal College of GPs need to get creative and come up with something that is acceptable. A way of qualifying Mental Heath GPs, or GPs who only treat women, or the elderly, or skin or whatever else GPs aren't taking enough interest in. People who specify in one particular area of "general" practice (I know) during their initial studies? Thus freeing up the GPs who need to be GPs? I don't have a clue, I'm just a member of the public, but somebody must have a better idea.
Constantly stating on the internet that GPs are undertrained or not good enough in a particular area destroys the patient’s confidence in their doctor which can be detrimental to the clinical relationship.
You literally just admitted the Royal College of GPs has already identified they are undertrained. But seriously even if you hadn't, surely a lot of people have learned this through experience of using the service. Are we expecting them to never talk about it because... it might put other people off? This just breeds even more distrust and lack of confidence. Have you been sleeping through the Astra Zeneca debacle - which was only a debacle because the figures on AZ website were 100% disingenuous and people had the sneaky suspicion (rightly or wrongly) that somebody, somewhere, was hiding something?
The government want to run down primary care so they can get private providers in who will cherry pick the easy patients and the rest will be stuck. I firmly believe this will not offer a better service nor more value to the taxpayer. These threads are feeding exactly into that narrative.
I think you are maybe underestimating how much public opinion is shifting on the entire healthcare system in general. A few years ago it was "the thing british people are most proud of". People were almost feral in their defence of it. Watching MPs discuss it on Question Time was so fascinating you could practically have David Attenborough narrating it.
But there has been a tangible shift. I believe privatisation in some form is inevitable and when they write the Wikipedia on how it happened, Covid will be a catalyst for sure, but it's been crumbling for some time now. Have a look at any thread mentioning maternity care. When I compare my mum's experience in the 90s (in a crumbling old victorian building) to mine in the 10s (in a brand new "super-hospital" the difference is shocking.
At 29 years old I've been in ICU after being fobbed off twice by a GP when google literally tells me women are at risk of blood clots after birth. I've watched an elderly relative bleed out on the floor while I waited an hour for an ambulance. I've had to pay privately to see a psychiatrist because I could not wait 2+ years. I've witnessed a relative get completely lost in the hospital system because nothing ever happens unless you kick up an absolute fuck and demand and demand some more. I've given birth twice and received care that can only be described as fit for animals. Slops to eat, disgusting showers, enforced sleep deprivation after surgery, absolutely zero dignity or privacy, inadequate pain relief, "get on with it" attitude.
So.... on reflection, do I believe the current system is not fit for purpose? Absolutely. Do I believe we need to move to at least a semi-privatised model and actually pay for healthcare? Yes. I do not have enough good memories of the NHS or my "family doctor" to be sentimental over them.