@LolaSmiles
As for an English specialist teacher not having heard of Rebecca, but that’s OK because it’s not on the curriculum...God help us. If Dickens wasn’t on the curriculum that year, would it be OK not to have heard of him? Chaucer? George Eliot?
As I said up thread, English teachers cover a range of specialists:
Older literature specialists
Modern literature specialists
Drama and theatre specialists
English language specialists
Linguistics specialists
Media specialists
Journalism specialists
Do you think that all English teachers should have a working knowledge of phonetics? What about Chekov? Should they all know the full history of rhetoric from ancient civilisation to the present day? Should they all know about the evolution of the English language and how variations of English are changing around the world to this day? Should they all be well versed in Victorian children's literature?
What exactly is the key must have knowledge that would make someone pass your "knowledge that is not on the curriculum" test?
I've worked with people who have an exceptional knowledge of early literature and studied Beowulf in its original form, and have studied texts in Old Norse. Their knowledge of 20th century literature isn't as strong. I'd certainly not be saying "God help us" if my DC were taught by them because I don't confuse "stuff I know" with "stuff I think others should know because I know it".
Do you think that all English teachers should have a working knowledge of phonetics?
They should know what phonetics are. That’s the point. You can be aware of things without having a ‘working knowledge’ of them. The OP didn’t expect the library assistant to explain the principal themes in As You Like It. She expected the library assistant to have heard of the play.
What about Chekov?
Yes, this may shock you, I would expect an English teacher to have heard of Anton Chekhov.
Should they all know the full history of rhetoric from ancient civilisation to the present day?
They should know what rhetoric is, yes?
Should they all know about the evolution of the English language and how variations of English are changing around the world to this day?
An English teacher should be aware of old English and Middle English, surely? Or do you think that it would be OK for them never to have heard of either?
Should they all be well versed in Victorian children's literature?
It would be rather odd if they hadn’t heard of Lewis Carroll or Mark Twain, right?
I don't confuse "stuff I know" with "stuff I think others should know because I know it".
Nor do I. Once more I refer you to the difference between general knowledge and common knowledge.
Look, I’m really sorry that I’ve denied you the chance to have a good old go at me, but this time it just hasn’t worked, has it? Better luck on the next thread!