Have schools gone backwards in their dealing with a child with a disability or medical issue?
When I was at school, same age as this child, there was a girl in my year with alopecia. She wore a hat to school all the time. And we had a strict uniform. Yes, she stood out. But we all knew what the problem was and, my God, she was defended against any comments by her peers! She chose what she was comfortable with, what she knew worked for her.
If a cap and hoodie work for this child I can't see the problem. She shouldn't have to try to work with a scarf, wig or any other item of head covering. She wears a cap and hoodie at home, she feels comfortable in them, she knows they cover what she needs to cover and that's all the school had to know. 'In discussion'? What a crock of shite.
The other thing that bothers me about this school (though not confirmed) is that in the first article it was stated, twice (once by a parent) 'Nikki-dawn Lindley, whose son joined the protest, added: “The kids have gone wearing hats and the school has refused to let them in and closed the gates not informing any parents just sent out a msg saying your child has not registered.'
So they locked year 9 kids out of school...a major safeguarding issue and, if I were a parent (whether my child was involved or not), I'd want an explanation from both the head teacher and the safeguarding lead. Because the safeguarding lead was obviously not doing their job properly in allowing kids to be stopped from entering school without parents being aware or asked to pick their child up. God forbid something had happened to a child.
I'm glad she got her needs met but it shouldn't have come to this. If my old school could sort this kind of medical need out, 44 years ago, a school with all their SEN/Safeguarding/disability discrimination legislation now should never have let it come to a press intervention.