The newsletter also reinforces the completely self absorbed perspective for 'spousal veto'.
My god. When people consider that their needs are so vastly more important than the person they had previously agreed to love and care for that they, and the people eager to side with them, cannot even consider the implications of legally changing their sex on a spouse and the marriage contract, you know that this movement has dehumanised anyone that disagrees.
That a school allowed this phrasing to be used, simply reinforces that they either did not read this before approving it or allowed a teacher with a distinct bias to approve it.