Given how complex and constantly changing the rules are I find it very hard to believe you're 100% sure you're right they're committing fraud.
I have friends and family who work for dwp and hmrc and even THEY are struggling to keep up with the constantly changing rules at the moment.
Plus even if they've said to you they are this might not be true, they might be confused themselves, they might have been being sarcastic and you've misread, various other options
I would not feel comfortable doing such a thing at this time.
Are there children affected by the income?
You need to bear in mind that certainly with the dwp they basically operate as "guilty until proven innocent" payments are stopped while investigations take place and it can take many months for them to be reinstated even if the claimant is completely innocent
Actually the only way you can be 100% sure is if you've seen all their financial statements and you're a qualified forensic accountant.
and not seen bank statements
Then you can't possibly be 100% sure
Dc are older teens they are still innocent children who will be negatively affected if you report
I'm wondering if you know what you know because you're in a role - paid employee or volunteer - where people confide their financial worries to you?
If so I think that's a breach of confidence and unethical and frankly disgusting!
Op, so sure of their conviction, has to name change.
How cowardly
Exactly! If you're so sure you're right yet you can't even have the guts to own it on here? Sounds dodgy as fuck to me!
My ex reported me a few times, always malicious, I was always vindicated because I never did anything wrong. But each time the payments were immediately stopped leaving me in serious hardship to the point I was having to miss meals, not replace worn essential clothing etc it shot my credit rating to shit too and I've only recently been able to rectify that and this was almost 20 years ago the first time!
It's a shitty thing to do imo.
So it is OK to report anonymously on the gov website but not try to stay anonymous on MN? Lol ok
Actually I think neither is ok.
The argument is that allowing reporters to be anonymous encourages reporting and protects those reporting from repercussions and therefore leads to more fraud being discovered. However, this means it is all too easy to report maliciously and escape censure! My ex is definitely who reported me, he admitted it to me but in such a way as I couldn't prove it and he got away with it multiple times.
I know all this as a fact due to my job.
As pps have asked, what is the ethical code of conduct for said job? Do these people have a reasonable expectation of confidentiality? Does it qualify you to truly understand ALL the interrelated rules?
and social welfare recipients from thei thread
We recipients know what it's like to have to battle for every penny and several of us on thread saying don't report have been the victims of malicious or even "just" misguided reports and suffered the consequences.
I'll say I reckon those saying report have NEVER been the victim of such circumstances and therefore don't know what it's like to be on that end of things
Wonder would these same folks would keep quiet if they heard their neighbour beating his wife though the walls how the FUCK is that remotely similar?! What an utterly disgusting and flippant comment to make.
FYI I've been in that situation and the neighbour was sheltered by me until police arrived and I gave a statement and evidence in court against him despite threats to myself.
Disgusting comment!
I'm far more disgusted by those who clearly have NO experience of being claimants and under constant scrutiny and worrying that some numpty who's completely ignorant of the rules and even things like invisible disability might decide we're frauds based on nothing but personal opinion and fuck us up completely!