Hello - they are pro self ID meaning that any man can declare himself a woman and access women’s spaces and they brought in a hate crime bill where abuse of cross dressers was a crime but abuse of women isn’t....
The 'abuse of cross dressers' has been a hate crime since 2010. Johann Lamont's proposed amendment would have removed protection from a group that has been protected since 2010. How, in any way, can that be described as 'protecting womens rights'?
The HCB did exactly, almost to the letter, what Lord Bracadale's independent inquiry finding suggested, i.e. rolling existing hate crime legislation into one bill, not including a specific misogyny crime because that requires further extensive investigation and discussion, and merits entirely separate legislation of it's own.
The resultant bill was passed with cross-party support, with only the Tory party voting against it.
This whole narrative that the HCB is 'anti-womens rights' is utterly fatuous, every single word of it, and stems from nothing but bitterness at continued SNP electoral success.
If, and when, the working group concludes that yes indeed, misogyny absolutely should be a hate crime, and also determines a solid and robust framework for the necessary legislation, how on earth is that going to be spun as 'the SNP hates women' then? I'm really eager to find out.