Name changed so my other threads aren't identifiable, but I'm a regular and long-term mumsnetter.
I completely understand that schools have never been shut, and that keyworker children and those classed as vulnerable have always been able to go in, and I realise that the reasons for being classed as vulnerable vary. However, unless a parents work situation has changed (understandable) or school has decided a child now classes as vulnerable when they haven't before, children shouldn't have suddenly started going back into school this/last week should they?
I'm happy for people to tell me there are reasons, maybe teachers that have started having some of their class back early, to tell me that actually this was allowed and we just weren't aware of it. Our concern however, is that the child is suddenly being classed as vulnerable.
This is in relation to one of our dc who is in primary and lives with us 50% of the time. We've had issues in the past where school haven't informed us of things even though we they are supposed to inform both parents of everything because they say it's privacy for the other parent, although if it's about the education or welfare of our dc. There have also been issues with home schooling, where despite us having the dc and equal amount of time, the work hasn't been done at the other house and we've either had to do the entire weeks worth or they've had to miss significant chunks- neither of which is fair on the dc.
While all this is frustrating that the other parents won't be supportive of the dc in that context, we've been doing the majority of the work with them and so that alone shouldn't be enough of a cause for concern for the dc to be taken back into school. As we haven't been informed of this, we've also not been taking them in on the days they're at our house. This leaves us worried that there are other concerns that we're not being made aware of. AIBU to think this is the case, or has it actually been ok for some children to have already returned to school part time and it's just coincidence that it's not on the days they've been with us?