OK, I certainly didn't mean to offend anyone and I appreciate your comments. But if one parent is at home, surely a key worker place shouldn't be given.
I'm not an expert and I'm not saying I necessarily disagree with you but I'm can see why people are frustrated when almost 1/2 the school appear to be key workers all of a sudden.
Maybe charity workers would have been a better example. I know one who is home working, doing admin and social media for a (albeit very important) charity, but she's at home, so why does she get the school place over someone doing the same job for a business that's trying to stay afloat? I don't know. Yet it's only the charity worker who gets the school place.
I'm not saying anything to intentionally offend anyone, and I agree in normal circumstances all these jobs would be classed as crucial, but difficult decisions have been made and it seems that key worker status has trumped some vulnerable children.
FWIW, there are two in that list I would not necessarily consider absolutely crucial unless there were critical circumstaces but I'm not going derail the thread by discussing them. But services in a lot of areas are massively reduced, therefore only the most crucial cases should be seen, so wouldn't this mean workloads have reduced? and if not, should something be put in place where only crucial cases are seen?