@benedicto
So we have to following the Guidance (which is what I quoted) and the law at the same time, but they say different things?
Only the law (legislation, regulations) is legally enforcsble.
Guidance can add colour and assist in interpretation where the law is ambiguous. As can ministerial statement.
However, neither should be used to invent laws that don't exist.
The police certainly shouldnt be adding distance limits that do not sieciducallu appear in either.
This is really important in a democracy. For instance, if the law didn't state a limit to travel to exercise, but guidance did, that would tend towards being a breach of the most fundamental rule of democracy, that only Parliament can make legally enforcable rules, if the guidance were enforced.
As an example, the Highway Code is guidance but not law. It is not legally enforceable in the way that the Road Traffic Acts are.
That a number of posters on mumsnet have no difficulty in understanding these basic concepts but certain police forces do, is rather concerning.
Personally, I'd rather love to be stopped and fined for breaching something that wouldn't stand up in court, and then challenging it and making a big fuss about doing so.