[quote Gwenhwyfar]"My inner city deprived state primary teaches the kids Latin- I wouldn't rely on that too much as an indicator."
Of course there are some state schools that teach Latin and people who learn on their own, and older people who were taught it, but IN GENERAL, it does give a clue.
A quick google gave me the following. No link to the original stats unfortunately, but I'm sure you could look them up if you really think the average state school still teaches Latin/Ancient Greek.
"In 2015, it was reported that the last non-selective state (publicly funded) school still teaching Greek A-level was about to drop the subject.
In their final year, only 3 pupils chose the subject.
In 2013, only 367 State schools out of 3,268 taught Latin A-level (though a somewhat larger number taught “Classical Civilisation”.)
So basically, if you want to study Greek and Latin to A-level, then it’s time to get out the cheque-book."
and here:
"As confirmed by a spokesperson from the [Cambridge] Classics department, only “a bit over a thousand” UK students study Latin A-level, with the vast majority of these coming from private schools. "
www.varsity.co.uk/news/18274[/quote]
I was responding to a post which said,
'A basic background in Latin is also a giveaway.'
I'd argue that one doesn't need to study Latin to A level in order to have a basic background in it. Not offered at A-level doesn't mean not taught, particularly at primary level.