Did anyone read about the recent research that says open fires (and log burners?) have been linked to dementia due to the pollution it produces. I’ll try and find it.
PM2.5 pass straight into the brain via the olfactory bulb. There is increasing evidence linking this to the evolution of dementia, possibly either through epigenetic mechanisms or through activation of inflammatory cascades.
While wood burning stoves (well kept, etc) are undoubtedly better in this respect than open fires, the pollution from said stoves is not inconsiderable, especially in the atmosphere outside the houses using them.
This is exacerbated in cold conditions, (ie. exactly when you would be using them) more especially when there is fog. Temperature inversions hold the pollution nearer the ground rather than letting it flow up and away. Add to this the flow dynamics of air around and between buildings, trees, etc, and you have pollution enveloping your, and adjacent buildings rather than drifting upwards, adding to the toxic environment around dwellings.
Pollution from domestic wood burning, most of this from stoves, reached 48 000 tonnes in 2018, the highest level since records began.
46 800 tonnes of this was PM2.5, far exceeding that produced by vehicles, industry or construction. (Gov Statistics - latest available)
PM2.5 are so small that they can enter a house even through apparently airtight windows and doors, so a draught-proofed house is no defence against your or your neighbours' wood burner particles.
Of course, being unable to ventilate your own house is very undesirable, leading to build up of internally generated VOC and PM2.5
These articles are from 2015/2016 - surely the log burners would have improved in 5 years?
Apparently not much. There is also the problem I mentioned of the testing of these burners under conditions far removed from those of everyday use.
There are a lot of vested interests involved here, not least politicians' chances of re-election and their own possession of said articles.