[quote AuntieJoyce]@herecomesthsun please do provide a more appropriate word for the effect of one person’s dramatics whipping others up into the same drama
This is why hysteria is being used here. The effect on a group
So no one is telling you you are not permitted to use this language, but likewise no one can stop me from pointing out the linguistic pitfalls
I find people who seek to educate me on things I already know beyond tedious. Is there a term for the group effect of that
[/quote]
re effect of one person whipping up others' emotions a group, I totally didn't get that from the OP.
You might want
- rhetoric
- oratory
- emotional bombast
perpetuated by
- a demagogue
- an agitator
- an opportunist
- possibly a politician, name no names
I do have a thesaurus [ grin]
These suppose though that the person knows what they're doing, in inciting emotion in their listeners. Like Marc Antony inflaming the crowd after Caesar's death.
There are other words for the person themselves being very swayed by emotion.
If you mean someone being overwhelmed with emotion (who isn't mentally unwell, but whose perspective is a bit distorted) then i would use
emotional
upset
got this out of proportion
Catastrophising is a psychological term that means, as you'd guess, someone who sees catastrophes in relatively small things, making a mountain out of a molehill, as a sort of psychological habit. It isn't an insult. It is a way of naming the habit so the person can see what they are doing and then be in a better position to change the habit. So it could be a very positive step to recognise this.
I would never as a feminist tell someone they were being hysterical.
Hysterical has a sad history in medicine and has been used up till quite recently in psychiatry to describe some symptoms of mental illness and it is a really unfortunate term to use in daily use.
But then, I'd never call someone psychotic in day to day talk either, unless using the word technically.